|
FERC FINANCIAL REPORT
|
||
These reports are mandatory under the Federal Power Act, Sections 3, 4(a), 304 and 309, and 18 CFR 141.1 and 141.400. Failure to report may result in criminal fines, civil penalties and other sanctions as provided by law. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission does not consider these reports to be of confidential nature
|
||
Exact Legal Name of Respondent (Company) |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
Schedules |
Pages |
Comparative Balance Sheet | 110-113 |
Statement of Income | 114-117 |
Statement of Retained Earnings | 118-119 |
Statement of Cash Flows | 120-121 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 122-123 |
FERC FORM NO.
REPORT OF MAJOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES, LICENSEES AND OTHER |
||||
Identification | ||||
01 Exact Legal Name of Respondent
|
02 Year/ Period of Report
End of: |
|||
03 Previous Name and Date of Change (If name changed during year)
/
|
||||
04 Address of Principal Office at End of Period (Street, City, State, Zip Code)
|
||||
05 Name of Contact Person
|
06 Title of Contact Person
|
|||
07 Address of Contact Person (Street, City, State, Zip Code)
|
||||
08 Telephone of Contact Person, Including Area Code
|
09 This Report is An Original / A Resubmission
(1)
☑ An Original ☐ A Resubmission |
10 Date of Report (Mo, Da, Yr)
|
||
Quarterly Corporate Officer Certification | ||||
The undersigned officer certifies that: I have examined this report and to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief all statements of fact contained in this report are correct statements of the business affairs of the respondent and the financial statements, and other financial information contained in this report, conform in all material respects to the Uniform System of Accounts. | ||||
|
03 Signature
|
04 Date Signed (Mo, Da, Yr)
|
||
Title 18, U.S.C. 1001 makes it a crime for any person to knowingly and willingly to make to any Agency or Department of the United States any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements as to any matter within its jurisdiction. |
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
List of Schedules |
||||
Enter in column (c) the terms "none," "not applicable," or "NA," as appropriate, where no information or amounts have been reported for certain pages. Omit pages where the respondents are "none," "not applicable," or "NA". |
||||
Line No. |
Title of Schedule (a) |
Reference Page No. (b) |
Remarks (c) |
|
ScheduleIdentificationAbstract Identification |
1 | |||
ScheduleListOfSchedulesAbstract List of Schedules (Electric Utility) |
2 | |||
1 |
ScheduleImportantChangesDuringTheQuarterYearAbstract Important Changes During the Quarter |
108 | ||
2 |
ScheduleComparativeBalanceSheetAbstract Comparative Balance Sheet |
110 | ||
3 |
ScheduleStatementOfIncomeAbstract Statement of Income for the Quarter |
114 | ||
4 |
ScheduleRetainedEarningsAbstract Statement of Retained Earnings for the Quarter |
118 | ||
5 |
ScheduleStatementOfCashFlowsAbstract Statement of Cash Flows |
120 | ||
6 |
ScheduleNotesToFinancialStatementsAbstract Notes to Financial Statements |
122 | ||
7 |
ScheduleStatementOfAccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeAndHedgingActivitiesAbstract Statement of Accum Comp Income, Comp Income, and Hedging Activities |
122a | ||
8 |
ScheduleSummaryOfUtilityPlantAndAccumulatedProvisionsForDepreciationAmortizationAndDepletionAbstract Summary of Utility Plant & Accumulated Provisions for Dep, Amort & Dep |
200 | ||
9 |
ScheduleElectricPlantInServiceAndAccumulatedProvisionForDepreciationByFunctionAbstract Electric Plant In Service and Accum Provision For Depr by Function |
208 | ||
10 |
ScheduleTransmissionServiceAndGenerationInterconnectionStudyCostsAbstract Transmission Service and Generation Interconnection Study Costs |
231 | ||
11 |
ScheduleOtherRegulatoryAssetsAbstract Other Regulatory Assets |
232 | ||
12 |
ScheduleOtherRegulatoryLiabilitiesAbstract Other Regulatory Liabilities |
278 | ||
13 |
ScheduleElectricOperatingRevenuesAbstract Elec Operating Revenues (Individual Schedule Lines 300-301) |
300 | ||
14 |
ScheduleRegionalTransmissionServiceRevenuesAbstract Regional Transmission Service Revenues (Account 457.1) |
302 |
|
|
15 |
ScheduleElectricProductionOtherPowerTransmissionRegionalExpensesAbstract Electric Prod, Other Power Supply Exp, Trans and Distrib Exp |
324 | ||
16 |
ScheduleElectricCustomerAccountServiceSalesAdministrativeAndGeneralExpensesAbstract Electric Customer Accts, Service, Sales, Admin and General Expenses |
325 | ||
17 |
ScheduleTransmissionOfElectricityForOthersAbstract Transmission of Electricity for Others |
328 | ||
18 |
ScheduleTransmissionOfElectricityByIsoOrRtoAbstract Transmission of Electricity by ISO/RTOs |
331 |
|
|
19 |
ScheduleTransmissionOfElectricityByOthersAbstract Transmission of Electricity by Others |
332 | ||
20 |
ScheduleDepreciationDepletionAndAmortizationsAbstract Deprec, Depl and Amort of Elec Plant (403,403.1,404,and 405) (except Amortization of Acquisition Adjustments) |
338 | ||
21 |
ScheduleAmountsIncludedInIsoOrRtoSettlementAbstract Amounts Included in ISO/RTO Settlement Statements |
397 | ||
22 |
ScheduleMonthlyPeaksAndOutputAbstract Monthly Peak Loads and Energy Output |
399 | ||
23 |
ScheduleMonthlyTransmissionSystemPeakLoadAbstract Monthly Transmission System Peak Load |
400 | ||
24 |
ScheduleMonthlyIsoOrRtoTransmissionSystemPeakLoadAbstract Monthly ISO/RTO Transmission System Peak Load |
400a |
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
IMPORTANT CHANGES DURING THE QUARTER/YEAR |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Give particulars (details) concerning the matters indicated below. Make the statements explicit and precise, and number them in accordance with the inquiries. Each inquiry should be answered. Enter "none," "not applicable," or "NA" where applicable. If information which answers an inquiry is given elsewhere in the report, make a reference to the schedule in which it appears.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perryville Substation (5-Acre Farm Lease) Effective Date: 6/8/23 Length of Term: 25 years (4/4/19–4/29/24) Names of Parties: Arizona Public Service Company (“APS”) and Silverton Ventures LLC (new lessee) Rents: $1.00 per year Other conditions: original lease terms did not change; lease was reassigned from prior lessee, Vaquero Company Name of commission authorizing the lease: APS Land Services Department Reference to authorization: LE-CA-PRD-0001 Commitment Authority and Signing Procedure Freedom Substation (45-Acre Farm Lease) Effective Date: 6/8/23 Length of Term: 5 years (1/1/22–12/31/27) Names of Parties: APS and Silverton Ventures LLC (new lessee) Rents: $5,889.00 per year Other conditions: original lease terms did not change; lease was reassigned from prior lessee, Vaquero Company Name of commission authorizing the lease: APS Land Services Department Reference to authorization: LE-CA-PRD-0001 Commitment Authority and Signing Procedure |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transmission: None. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As of June 30, 2023, our fuel and purchased power and purchase obligation commitments have increased by $5.5 billion from the information provided in our 2022 FERC Form 1. The change is primarily due to new purchased power and energy storage commitments and also includes a $505 million reduction of commitments due to the termination of an energy storage purchased power contract for a project that was not developed. The majority of the changes relate to 2025 and thereafter. This amount includes approximately $4.3 billion of commitments relating to purchased power lease contracts. See Note 14. Other than the items described above, there have been no material changes, as of June 30, 2023, outside the normal course of business in contractual obligations from the information provided in our 2022 FERC Form 1. See Note 5 for discussion regarding changes in our short-term and long-term debt obligations. Credit Facilities On April 10, 2023, APS replaced its two $500 million revolving credit facilities that would have matured on May 28, 2026, with a new $1.25 billion revolving credit facility that matures on April 10, 2028. APS has the option to increase the amount of the facility up to a maximum of $400 million, for a total of $1.65 billion, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions and with the consent of the lenders. Interest rates are based on APS’s senior unsecured debt credit ratings and the agreement includes a sustainability-linked pricing metric which permits an interest rate reduction or increase by meeting or missing targets related to specific environmental and employee health and safety sustainability objectives. This facility is available to support APS’s general corporate purposes, including support for APS’s commercial paper program, which was increased from $750 million to $1 billion on April 10, 2023, for bank borrowings or for issuances of letters of credit. At June 30, 2023, APS had no outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facilities, no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities, and $285 million of outstanding commercial paper borrowings. On January 6, 2023, Pinnacle West contributed $150 million into APS in the form of an equity infusion. APS used this contribution to repay short-term indebtedness. On June 30, 2023, APS issued $500 million of 5.55% unsecured senior notes that mature August 1, 2033. The net proceeds from the sale were used to repay short-term indebtedness consisting of commercial paper and for general corporate purposes. See “Financial Assurances” in Note 10 for a discussion of other outstanding letters of credit. Financial Assurances In the normal course of business, we obtain standby letters of credit and surety bonds from financial institutions and other third parties. These instruments guarantee our own future performance and provide third parties with financial and performance assurance in the event we do not perform. These instruments support commodity contract collateral obligations and other transactions. As of June 30, 2023, standby letters of credit totaled approximately $0.2 million and will expire in 2023 and 2024. As of June 30, 2023, surety bonds expiring through 2025 totaled approximately $15 million. The underlying liabilities insured by these instruments are reflected on our balance sheets, where applicable. Therefore, no additional liability is reflected for the letters of credit and surety bonds themselves. We enter into agreements that include indemnification provisions relating to liabilities arising from or related to certain of our agreements. Most significantly, APS has agreed to indemnify the equity participants and other parties in the Palo Verde sale leaseback transactions with respect to certain tax matters. Generally, a maximum obligation is not explicitly stated in the indemnification provisions and, therefore, the overall maximum amount of the obligation under such indemnification provisions cannot be reasonably estimated. Based on historical experience and evaluation of the specific indemnities, we do not believe that any material loss related to such indemnification provisions is likely. Authorizations On December 17, 2020, the Arizona Corporation Commission (“ACC”) issued a financing order, Decision No. 77853, in which, subject to specified parameters and procedures, it approved APS’s short-term debt authorization equal to a sum of (i) 7% of APS’s capitalization, and (ii) $500 million (which is required to be used for costs relating to purchases of natural gas and power) and a long-term debt authorization of $7.5 billion. On December 15, 2022, the ACC issued a financing order, Decision No. 78814, approving APS’s application filed on April 6, 2022 requesting to further increase the long-term debt limit from $7.5 billion to $8.0 billion and to exclude financing lease power purchase agreements (“PPAs”) from the definition of long-term debt for purposes of the ACC financing orders. The order also reaffirmed the short-term debt authorization from the 2020 financing order. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMMENTS: a.The overall non-union employee merit budget was 3.0%. Actual merit adjustments ranged from 0% to 7.1% based upon an employee's performance and their pay position within the salary range. Merit pay awards were added to base pay. b.Salary adjustments to base pay are awarded to non-union employees throughout the year in special instances. c.Promotions were awarded to union and non-union employees due to changes in job functions or grade level changes. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I. LITIGATION & ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS Palo Verde Generating Station Spent Nuclear Fuel and Waste Disposal On December 19, 2012, APS, acting on behalf of itself and the participant owners of Palo Verde, filed a second breach of contract lawsuit against the United States Department of Energy (“DOE”) in the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Court of Federal Claims”). The lawsuit sought to recover damages incurred due to DOE’s breach of the Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High Level Radioactive Waste (“Standard Contract”) for failing to accept Palo Verde’s spent nuclear fuel and high level waste from January 1, 2007, through June 30, 2011, pursuant to the terms of the Standard Contract and the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. On August 18, 2014, APS and DOE entered into a settlement agreement, which required DOE to pay the Palo Verde owners for certain specified costs incurred by Palo Verde during the period January 1, 2007, through June 30, 2011. In addition, the settlement agreement provided APS with a method for submitting claims and getting recovery for costs incurred through December 31, 2016, which was extended to December 31, 2025. APS has submitted eight claims pursuant to the terms of the August 18, 2014 settlement agreement, for eight separate time periods during July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2021. The DOE has approved and paid $123.9 million for these claims (APS’s share is $36.0 million). The amounts recovered were primarily recorded as adjustments to a regulatory liability and had no impact on reported net income. In accordance with the 2017 Rate Case Decision, this regulatory liability is being refunded to customers. On October 31, 2022, APS filed its ninth claim pursuant to the terms of the August 18, 2014 settlement agreement. On March 16, 2023, the DOE approved a payment in the amount of $14.3 million (APS’s share is $4.2 million), and on April 6, 2023, APS received this payment. Superfund and Other Related Matters The Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (“Superfund” or “CERCLA”) establishes liability for the cleanup of hazardous substances found contaminating the soil, water or air. Those who released, generated, transported to or disposed of hazardous substances at a contaminated site are among the parties who are potentially responsible (each a “PRP”). PRPs may be strictly, jointly, and severally liable for clean-up. On September 3, 2003, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) advised APS that EPA considers APS to be a PRP in the Motorola 52nd Street Superfund Site, Operable Unit 3 (“OU3”) in Phoenix, Arizona. APS has facilities that are within this Superfund site. APS has agreed with EPA to perform certain investigative activities of the APS facilities within OU3. In addition, on September 23, 2009, APS agreed with EPA and one other PRP to voluntarily assist with the funding and management of the site-wide groundwater remedial investigation and feasibility study (“RI/FS”). The RI/FS for OU3 was finalized and submitted to EPA at the end of 2022. APS cannot predict the EPA’s timing with respect to this matter. APS’s estimated costs related to this investigation and study is approximately $3 million. APS anticipates incurring additional expenditures in the future, but because the ultimate remediation requirements are not yet finalized by EPA, at the present time expenditures related to this matter cannot be reasonably estimated. On August 6, 2013, the Roosevelt Irrigation District (“RID”) filed a lawsuit in Arizona District Court against APS and 24 other defendants, alleging that RID’s groundwater wells were contaminated by the release of hazardous substances from facilities owned or operated by the defendants. The lawsuit also alleges that, under Superfund laws, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to RID. The allegations against APS arise out of APS’s current and former ownership of facilities in and around OU3. As part of a state governmental investigation into groundwater contamination in this area, on January 25, 2015, the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (“ADEQ”) sent a letter to APS seeking information concerning the degree to which, if any, APS’s current and former ownership of these facilities may have contributed to groundwater contamination in this area. APS responded to ADEQ on May 4, 2015. On December 16, 2016, two RID environmental and engineering contractors filed an ancillary lawsuit for recovery of costs against APS and the other defendants in the RID litigation. That same day, another RID service provider filed an additional ancillary CERCLA lawsuit against certain of the defendants in the main RID litigation but excluded APS and certain other parties as named defendants. Because the ancillary lawsuits concern past costs allegedly incurred by these RID vendors, which were ruled unrecoverable directly by RID in November of 2016, the additional lawsuits do not increase APS’s exposure or risk related to these matters. On April 5, 2018, RID and the defendants in that particular litigation executed a settlement agreement, fully resolving RID’s CERCLA claims concerning both past and future cost recovery. APS’s share of this settlement was immaterial. In addition, the two environmental and engineering vendors voluntarily dismissed their lawsuit against APS and the other named defendants without prejudice. An order to this effect was entered on April 17, 2018. With this disposition of the case, the vendors may file their lawsuit again in the future. On August 16, 2019, Maricopa County, one of the three direct defendants in the service provider lawsuit, filed a third-party complaint seeking contribution for its liability, if any, from APS and 28 other third-party defendants. On September 30, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona granted partial summary judgment to the direct defendants for $20.7 million of the approximately $21.2 million in CERCLA response costs claimed by the service provider. Based on the court’s denial of the service provider’s motion for reconsideration, the service provider filed a motion for entry of judgment on June 12, 2023, and waived its rights to recover the remaining approximately $500,000 in claimed response costs, for the stated purpose of appealing the September 2022 summary judgment order to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. We are unable to predict the outcome of any further litigation related to the claim for $20.7 million in response costs; however, we do not expect the outcome to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. On February 28, 2022, EPA provided APS with a request for information under CERCLA related to APS’s Ocotillo power plant site located in Tempe, Arizona. In particular, EPA seeks information from APS regarding APS’s use, storage, and disposal of substances containing per-and polyfluoroalkyl (“PFAS”) compounds at the Ocotillo power plant site in order to aid EPA’s investigation into actual or threatened releases of PFAS into groundwater within the South Indian Bend Wash (“SIBW”) Superfund site. The SIBW Superfund site includes the APS Ocotillo power plant site. APS filed its response to this information request on April 29, 2022. On January 17, 2023, EPA contacted APS to inform the Company that it would be commencing on-site investigations within the SIBW site, including the Ocotillo power plant, and performing a remedial investigation and feasibility study related to potential PFAS impacts to groundwater over the next two to three years. APS estimates that its costs to oversee and participate in the remedial investigation work will be approximately $1.7 million. At the present time, we are unable to predict the outcome of this matter and any further expenditures related to necessary remediation, if any, or further investigations cannot be reasonably estimated. Four Corners SCR Cost Recovery As part of APS’s 2019 Rate Case, APS included recovery of the deferral and rate base effects of the Four Corners Power Plant (“Four Corners”) selective catalytic reduction (“SCR”) project. On November 2, 2021, the 2019 Rate Case decision was approved by the ACC allowing approximately $194 million of SCR related plant investments and cost deferrals in rate base and to recover, depreciate and amortize in rates based on an end-of-life assumption of July 2031. The decision also included a partial and combined disallowance of $215.5 million on the SCR investments and deferrals. APS believes the SCR plant investments and related SCR cost deferrals were prudently incurred, and on December 17, 2021, APS filed its Notice of Direct Appeal at the Arizona Court of Appeals requesting review of the $215.5 million disallowance. The Arizona Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on November 30, 2022. On March 6, 2023, the Court of Appeals issued its order in the matter, vacating the ACC’s disallowance of the SCR investment and remanding the matter back to the ACC for further review in accordance with ACC rules and the order of the Court of Appeals. On June 21, 2023, the ACC approved a joint settlement filed by APS and the ACC’s Legal Division that resolved all issues relating to the 2019 Rate Case decision, including recovery of the cost of the Four Corners SCRs. See “Four Corners SCR Cost Recovery” and “2019 Retail Rate Case” below for additional information. Environmental Matters APS is subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations affecting many aspects of its present and future operations, including air emissions of both conventional pollutants and greenhouse gases (“GHGs”), water quality, wastewater discharges, solid waste, hazardous waste, and coal combustion residuals (“CCRs”). These laws and regulations can change from time to time, imposing new obligations on APS resulting in increased capital, operating, and other costs. Associated capital expenditures or operating costs could be material. APS intends to seek recovery of any such environmental compliance costs through our rates but cannot predict whether it will obtain such recovery. The following proposed and final rules involve material compliance costs to APS. Coal Combustion Waste. On December 19, 2014, EPA issued its final regulations governing the handling and disposal of CCR, such as fly ash and bottom ash. The rule regulates CCR as a non-hazardous waste under Subtitle D of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and establishes national minimum criteria for existing and new CCR landfills and surface impoundments and all lateral expansions. These criteria include standards governing location restrictions, design and operating criteria, groundwater monitoring and corrective action, closure requirements and post closure care, and recordkeeping, notification, and internet posting requirements. The rule generally requires any existing unlined CCR surface impoundment to stop receiving CCR and either retrofit or close, and further requires the closure of any CCR landfill or surface impoundment that cannot meet the applicable performance criteria for location restrictions or structural integrity. Such closure requirements are deemed “forced closure” or “closure for cause” of unlined surface impoundments and are the subject of the regulatory and judicial activities described below. Since these regulations were finalized, EPA has taken steps to substantially modify the federal rules governing CCR disposal. While certain changes have been prompted by utility industry petitions, others have resulted from judicial review, court-approved settlements with environmental groups, and statutory changes to RCRA. The following lists the pending regulatory changes that, if finalized, could have a material impact as to how APS manages CCR at its coal-fired power plants: •Following the passage of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act in 2016, EPA possesses authority to either authorize states to develop their own permit programs for CCR management or issue federal permits governing CCR disposal both in states without their own permit programs and on tribal lands. Although ADEQ has taken steps to develop a CCR permitting program, and new state legislation has been adopted providing ADEQ with appropriate permitting authority for CCR under the state solid waste management program, it is not clear when that program will be put into effect. On December 19, 2019, EPA proposed its own set of regulations governing the issuance of CCR management permits, which would impact facilities like Four Corners located on the Navajo Nation. The proposal remains pending. •On March 1, 2018, as a result of a settlement with certain environmental groups, EPA proposed adding boron to the list of constituents that trigger corrective action requirements to remediate groundwater impacted by CCR disposal activities. Apart from a subsequent proposal issued on August 14, 2019, to add a specific, health-based groundwater protection standard for boron, EPA has yet to take action on this proposal. •With respect to APS’s Cholla Power Plant (“Cholla”) facility, APS’s application for alternative closure was submitted to EPA on November 30, 2020. While EPA has deemed APS’s application administratively “complete,” the Agency’s approval remains pending. If granted, this application would allow the continued disposal of CCR within Cholla’s existing unlined CCR surface impoundments until the required date for ceasing coal-fired boiler operations in April 2025. This application will be subject to public comment and, potentially, judicial review. We expect to have a proposed decision from EPA regarding Cholla sometime in 2023. •On May 18, 2023, EPA published a proposal that expands the scope of federal CCR regulations to address the impacts from historical CCR disposal activities that would have ceased prior to 2015. EPA proposes to define a new class of CCR management units (“CCRMUs”) that broadly encompass any location at an operating coal-fired power plant where CCR would have been placed on land. As proposed, this would include not only historically closed landfills and surface impoundments but also prior applications of CCR beneficial use. EPA expects to finalize this proposal by spring of 2024. We cannot at this time predict the outcome of these regulatory proceedings or when EPA will take final action on those matters that are still pending. Depending on the eventual outcome, the costs associated with APS’s management of CCR could materially increase, which could affect APS’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. APS currently disposes of CCR in ash ponds and dry storage areas at Cholla and Four Corners. APS estimates that its share of incremental costs to comply with the CCR rule for Four Corners is approximately $30 million and its share of incremental costs to comply with the CCR rule for Cholla is approximately $19 million. The Navajo Generating Station (“Navajo Plant”) disposed of CCR only in a dry landfill storage area. To comply with the CCR rule for the Navajo Plant, APS’s share of incremental costs was approximately $1 million, which has been incurred. Additionally, the CCR rule requires ongoing, phased groundwater monitoring. As of October 2018, APS has completed the statistical analyses for its CCR disposal units that triggered assessment monitoring. APS determined that several of its CCR disposal units at Cholla and Four Corners will need to undergo corrective action. In addition, under the current regulations, all such disposal units must have ceased operating and initiated closure by April 11, 2021, at the latest (except for those disposal units subject to alternative closure). APS completed the assessments of corrective measures on June 14, 2019; however, additional investigations and engineering analyses that will support the remedy selection are still underway. In addition, APS will also solicit input from the public and host public hearings as part of this process. Based on the work performed to date, APS currently estimates that its share of corrective action and monitoring costs at Four Corners will likely range from $10 million to $15 million, which would be incurred over 30 years. As to Cholla, APS currently estimates that its share of corrective action and monitoring costs at this facility will likely range from $35 million to $40 million, which similarly would be incurred over 30 years. As APS continues to implement the CCR rule’s corrective action assessment process, the current cost estimates may change. Given uncertainties that may exist until we have fully completed the corrective action assessment and final remedy selection process, APS cannot predict any ultimate impacts to APS; however, at this time APS does not believe that any potential changes to the cost estimate for Four Corners or Cholla would have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. EPA Power Plant Carbon Regulations. EPA’s regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from electric utility power plants has proceeded in fits and starts over most of the last decade. Starting on August 3, 2015, EPA finalized the Clean Power Plan, which was the Agency’s first effort at such regulation through system-wide generation dispatch shifting. Those regulations were subsequently repealed by the EPA on June 19, 2019 and replaced by the Affordable Clean Energy (“ACE”) regulations, which were a far narrower set of rules. While the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit subsequently vacated the ACE regulations on January 19, 2021, and ordered a remand for EPA to develop replacement regulations consistent with the original 2015 Clean Power Plan, the U.S. Supreme Court subsequently reversed that decision on June 30, 2022, holding that the Clean Power Plan exceeded EPA’s authority under the Clean Air Act. In the latest set of proposed rules, released on May 23, 2023, EPA contemplates emission standards and guidelines for various subcategories of new and existing power plants. Unlike EPA’s Clean Power Plan regulations from 2015, which took a broad, system-wide approach to regulating carbon emissions from electric utility fossil-fuel burning power plants, the most recent proposal is limited to measures that can be installed at individual power plants to limit planet-warming emissions. As such, for new natural gas-fired combustion turbine power plants, EPA is proposing that carbon emission performance standards apply based on the annual capacity factors. For the highest utilization combustion turbines, EPA is therefore proposing that such facilities be retrofitted for carbon capture and sequestration or utilization controls (“CCS”) or varying levels of hydrogen gas (“H2”) co-firing. As for existing natural gas-fired combustion turbines, EPA is imposing similar control requirements at large, high utilization generating units, but is otherwise not proceeding at this time with further regulation. As such, under EPA’s proposal, this means that both new and existing peaking gas-fired combustion turbines (i.e., those with a 20% or less annual capacity factor) are effectively unregulated under the proposed regulations. For coal-fired power plants, instead of imposing regulations based on capacity and utilization, EPA has developed subcategories based on planned retirement dates. This means that facilities retiring between 2030 and before 2040 must meet increasingly stringent emission limits up to natural-gas co-firing starting in 2030. However, for those facilities with no planned retirement date prior to 2040, EPA is requiring those plants to be retrofitted with CCS controls by 2030. EPA expects to take final action on this proposal by spring or summer of 2024. At this time, APS cannot predict the outcome of this rulemaking or when EPA will take final action. In addition, APS is continuing to evaluate this proposal and its potential impact on APS’s operations. Depending on the eventual outcome, the costs associated with APS’s operation of its current and future thermal power plants could materially increase, which could affect APS’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Other environmental rules that could involve material compliance costs include those related to effluent limitations, the ozone national ambient air quality standard and other rules or matters involving the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, RCRA, Superfund, the Navajo Nation, and water supplies for our power plants. The financial impact of complying with current and future environmental rules could jeopardize the economic viability of APS’s fossil-fuel powered plants or the willingness or ability of power plant participants to fund any required equipment upgrades or continue their participation in these plants. The economics of continuing to own certain resources, particularly our coal plants, may deteriorate, warranting early retirement of those plants, which may result in asset impairments. APS would seek recovery in rates for the book value of any remaining investments in the plants, as well as other costs related to early retirement, but cannot predict whether it would obtain such recovery. Four Corners National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) Permit The latest NPDES permit for Four Corners was issued on September 30, 2019. Based upon a November 1, 2019 filing by several environmental groups, the Environmental Appeals Board (“EAB”) took up review of the Four Corners NPDES Permit. The EAB denied the environmental group petition on September 30, 2020. While on January 22, 2021, the environmental groups filed a petition for review of the EAB’s decision with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the parties to the litigation (including APS) finalized a settlement on May 2, 2022. This settlement requires investigation of thermal wastewater discharges from Four Corners, administratively closes the litigation filed in January of 2021, and is not expected to have a material impact on APS’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. II. REGULATORY MATTERS 2022 Retail Rate Case APS filed an application with the ACC on October 28, 2022 (the “2022 Rate Case”) seeking an increase in annual retail base rates on the date rates become effective (“Day 1”) of a net $460 million. This Day 1 net impact represents a total base revenue deficiency of $772 million offset by proposed adjustor transfers of cost recovery to annual retail rates and adjustor mechanism modifications. The average annual customer bill impact of APS’s request on Day 1 is an increase of 13.6%. The principal provisions of APS’s application are: •a test year comprised of twelve months ended June 30, 2022, adjusted as described below; •an original cost rate base of $10.5 billion, which approximates the ACC-jurisdictional portion of the book value of utility assets, net of accumulated depreciation and other credits; •the following proposed capital structure and costs of capital:
•a 1% return on the increment of fair value rate base above APS’s original cost rate base, as provided for by Arizona law; •a rate of $0.038321 per kWh for the portion of APS’s retail base rates attributable to fuel and purchased power costs (“Base Fuel Rate”); •modification of its adjustment mechanisms including: •eliminate the Environmental Improvement Surcharge (“EIS”) and collect costs through base rates, ▪eliminate the Lost Fixed Cost Recovery (“LFCR”) mechanism and collect costs through base rates and the Demand Side Management Adjustment Charge (“DSMAC”), ▪maintain as inactive the Tax Expense Adjustor Mechanism (“TEAM”), ▪maintain the Transmission Cost Adjustment (“TCA”) mechanism, ▪modify the performance incentive in the DSMAC, and ▪modify the Renewable Energy Adjustment Charge (“REAC”) to include recovery of capital carrying costs of APS owned renewable and storage resources; •changes to its limited-income program, including a second tier to provide an additional discount for customers with greater need; and •twelve months of post-Test Year plant investments to reflect used and useful projects that will be placed into service prior to July 1, 2023. On June 5, 2023 and June 15, 2023, the ACC Staff, the Residential Utility Consumer Office (“RUCO”) and other intervenors filed their initial written testimony with the ACC. The ACC Staff recommends, among other things, (i) a $251 million revenue increase or, as an alternative, a $312 million revenue increase, (ii) a 9.6% return on equity, (iii) a 0.0% fair value increment or, as an alternative, a 0.75% fair value increment, and (iv) a continuation of a 12-month post-test year plant. RUCO recommends, among other things, (i) an $84.9 million revenue increase, (ii) an 8.2% return on equity or, as an alternative, an 8.7% return on equity if the ACC imputes a hypothetical capital structure with a 46% equity layer, (iii) a fair value increment of 0.0%, and (iv) a reduction of post-test year plant to six months. On July 12, 2023, APS filed rebuttal testimony addressing the ACC Staff and intervenors’ direct testimonies. The principal provisions of APS’s rebuttal testimony are: •reducing the revenue requirement increase to $383.1 million; •maintaining a return on equity request of 10.25%; •reducing the increment of fair value rate base return to 0.5% from 1.0%; •maintaining a post-test year plant request of 12 months, plus the Four Corners Effluent Limitation Guidelines (“ELG”) project; •withdrawing the Payment Fee Removal Proposal (net reduction) which was originally requested in APS’s initial application; •maintaining the LFCR mechanism and DSMAC as separate adjustors; •increasing the Power Supply Adjustment (“PSA”) annual rate change limit from $0.004/kWh to $0.006/kWh; •proposing a new System Reliability Benefit (“SRB”) recovery mechanism; •maintaining the REAC in its current state; •maintaining adjustor base transfers and elimination of EIS; and •maintaining the request to recover Coal Community Transition (“CCT”) funding. On July 26, 2023, the ACC Staff, RUCO and other intervenors filed their surrebuttal testimony with the ACC. The ACC Staff adjusted their initial recommendations to, among other things, (i) a $281.9 million revenue increase, (ii) a 9.68% return on equity, (iii) a 0.5% fair value increment, (iv) a continuation of a 12-month post-test year plant that includes the Four Corners ELG project, and (v) support of an increase to the annual PSA increase limit to $0.006/kWh. RUCO maintained their direct position and also recommended further review of the PSA in a second phase of the 2022 Rate Case. APS’s rejoinder testimony is due on August 4, 2023. APS requested that the increase become effective December 1, 2023. The hearing for this rate case is currently scheduled to begin in August 2023. APS cannot predict the outcome of its request. 2019 Retail Rate Case On October 31, 2019, APS filed an application with the ACC for an annual increase in retail base rates (the “2019 Rate Case”). On August 2, 2021, an Administrative Law Judge issued a Recommended Opinion and Order in the 2019 Rate Case (the “2019 Rate Case ROO”) and issued corrections on September 10 and September 20, 2021. The 2019 Rate Case ROO recommended, among other things, (i) a $111 million decrease in annual revenue requirements, (ii) a return on equity of 9.16%, (iii) a 0.30% return on the increment of fair value rate base greater than original cost, with total fair value rate of return further adjusted to include a 0.03% reduction to return on equity resulting in an effective fair value rate of return of 4.95%, (iv) the nonrecovery of the deferral and rate base effects of the operating costs and construction of the Four Corners SCR project (see “Four Corners SCR Cost Recovery” below for additional information), (v) the recovery of the deferral and rate base effects of the operating costs and construction of the Ocotillo modernization project, which includes a reduction in the return on the deferral, (vi) a 15% disallowance of annual amortization of the Navajo Generating Station (the “Navajo Plant”) regulatory asset recovery related to the closure of the Navajo Plant (see “Navajo Plant” below), (vii) the denial of the request to defer, until APS’s next general rate case, the increase or decrease in its Arizona property taxes attributable to tax rate changes, and (viii) a collaborative process to review and recommend revisions to APS’s adjustment mechanisms within 12 months after the date of the decision. The 2019 Rate Case ROO also recommended that the CCT plan related to the closure or future closure of coal-fired generation facilities include the following components: (i) $50 million that will be paid over 10 years to the Navajo Nation, (ii) $5 million that will be paid over five years to the Navajo County Communities surrounding Cholla, and (iii) $1.675 million that will be paid to the Hopi Tribe related to APS’s ownership interests in the Navajo Plant. These amounts would be recoverable from APS’s customers through the Arizona Renewable Energy Standard and Tariff (“RES”) adjustment mechanism. APS filed exceptions on September 13, 2021, regarding the disallowance of the SCR cost deferrals and plant investments that was recommended in the 2019 Rate Case ROO, among other issues. On October 6, 2021 and October 27, 2021, the ACC voted on various amendments to the 2019 Rate Case ROO that would result in, among other things, (i) a return on equity of 8.70%, which includes a 20-basis point penalty, (ii) the recovery of the deferral and rate base effects of the operating costs and construction of the Four Corners SCR project, with the exception of $215.5 million (see “Four Corners SCR Cost Recovery” below), (iii) that the CCT plan include the following components: (a) a payment of $1 million to the Hopi Tribe within 60 days of the 2019 Rate Case decision, (b) a payment of $10 million over three years to the Navajo Nation, (c) a payment of $0.5 million to the Navajo County communities within 60 days of the 2019 Rate Case decision, (d) up to $1.25 million for electrification of homes and businesses on the Hopi reservation, and (e) up to $1.25 million for the electrification of homes and businesses on the Navajo Nation reservation. These payments and expenditures are attributable to the future closures of Four Corners and Cholla, along with the prior closure of the Navajo Plant and all ordered payments and expenditures would be recoverable through rates, and (iv) a change in the residential on-peak time-of-use period from 3 p.m. to 8 p.m. to 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. The 2019 Rate Case ROO, as amended, resulted in a total annual revenue decrease for APS of $4.8 million, excluding temporary payments and expenditures, under the CCT plan. On November 2, 2021, the ACC approved the 2019 Rate Case ROO, as amended. Consistent with the 2019 Rate Case decision, APS implemented the new rates effective as of December 1, 2021. In addition, the ACC ordered extensive compliance and reporting obligations. APS completed the implementation of the new on-peak hours for residential customers before the September 1, 2022 deadline. Additionally, consistent with the 2019 Rate Case decision, as of July 2023, APS completed the following payments that will be recoverable through rates related to the CCT: (i) $6.66 million to the Navajo Nation; (ii) $0.5 million to the Navajo County communities; and (iii) $1 million to the Hopi Tribe. Consistent with APS’s commitment to the impacted communities, APS has also completed the following payments: (i) $1 million to the Navajo Nation for CCT; (ii) $1.1 million to the Navajo County Communities for CCT and economic development; and (iii) $1.25 million to the Hopi Tribe for CCT and economic development. The ACC has also authorized $1.25 million to be recovered through rates for electrification of homes and businesses on both the Navajo Nation and Hopi reservation. Expenditure of the recoverable funds for electrification of homes and businesses on the Navajo Nation and the Hopi reservations is contingent upon completion of a census of the unelectrified homes and businesses in each that are also within APS service territory. On November 24, 2021, APS filed an application for rehearing of the 2019 Rate Case with the ACC and the application was deemed denied on December 15, 2021, as the ACC did not act upon it. On December 17, 2021, APS filed its Notice of Direct Appeal at the Arizona Court of Appeals and a Petition for Special Action with the Arizona Supreme Court, requesting review of the disallowance of $215.5 million of Four Corners SCR plant investments and deferrals (see “Four Corners SCR Cost Recovery” below for additional information) and the 20-basis-point penalty reduction to the return on equity, among other things. On February 8, 2022, the Arizona Supreme Court declined to accept jurisdiction on APS’s Petition for Special Action. The Arizona Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on November 30, 2022. On March 6, 2023, the Court issued its opinion in this matter, affirming in part and reversing in part the ACC’s decision in the 2019 Rate Case. The Court vacated the 20-basis-point penalty included in the ACC’s allowed return on equity, as the Court determined the use of customer service metrics to justify the reduction exceeded the ACC’s ratemaking authority. Additionally, the Court vacated the disallowance of $215.5 million of APS’s Four Corners SCR investment. The Court remanded the issue to the ACC for further proceedings. The ACC requested an extension of the 30-day deadline to appeal the matter to the Arizona Supreme Court, and the Arizona Supreme Court granted the extension of the deadline to May 8, 2023. The ACC filed an appeal on May 8, 2023, and on May 15, 2023, requested a suspension of the case to allow for settlement discussions between the parties, which was approved by the Court. On June 14, 2023, APS and the ACC Legal Division filed a joint resolution to allow recovery of the $215.5 million in costs related to the installation of the Four Corners SCR, a reversal of the 20-basis point reduction to APS’s return on equity from 8.9% to 8.7% as a result of the 2019 Rate Case Decision, and recovery of $59.6 million in revenue lost by APS between December of 2021 and June 20, 2023. On June 21, 2023, the ACC approved the joint resolution, and the proposals in the joint resolution became effective on July 1, 2023. On July 18, 2023, the Sierra Club filed an application for rehearing of the Commission’s decision. If the Commission does not grant the application within 20 days, it will be deemed denied. The Sierra Club will have 30 days after resolution of its request for rehearing to file a notice of appeal to Arizona Court of Appeals. Matter of Impact of the Closures of Fossil-Based Generation Plan on Impacted Communities On September 28, 2022, ACC Staff filed their staff report in the Matter of Impact of the Closures of Fossil-Based Generation Plan on Impacted Communities. APS and other interested parties filed comments on the report. On October 21, 2022, ACC Staff filed a revised report and proposed order. The revised report and proposed order recommended that funds for CCT shall not be collected from rate payers. On December 8, 2022, the ACC voted against ACC Staff’s proposed order, and on April 17, 2023, the ACC closed the docket. Any further action on CCT issues will take place in utility rate cases, including the currently pending 2022 Rate Case. APS cannot predict the outcome of this matter. Information Technology ACC Investigation On December 16, 2021, the ACC opened an investigation into various matters related to APS’s Information Technology department, including information about technology projects, costs, vendor management leadership and decision making. APS is cooperating with the investigation. APS cannot predict the outcome of this matter. 2016 Retail Rate Case Filing and the 2017 Settlement Agreement On June 1, 2016, APS filed an application with the ACC for an annual increase in retail base rates. On March 27, 2017, a majority of the stakeholders in the general retail rate case, including the ACC Staff, RUCO, limited income advocates and private rooftop solar organizations signed a settlement agreement (the “2017 Settlement Agreement”) and filed it with the ACC. The 2017 Settlement Agreement provides for, among other things, a net retail base rate increase of $94.6 million, excluding the transfer of adjustor balances, consisting of: (1) a non-fuel, non-depreciation, base rate increase of $87.2 million per year; (2) a base rate decrease of $53.6 million attributable to reduced fuel and purchased power costs; and (3) a base rate increase of $61.0 million due to changes in depreciation schedules. On August 15, 2017, the ACC approved the 2017 Settlement Agreement without material modifications, and on August 18, 2017, the ACC issued a final written Opinion and Order reflecting its decision in APS’s general retail rate case (the “2017 Rate Case Decision”). The new rates went into effect on August 19, 2017. See “Rate Plan Comparison Tool and Investigation” below for information regarding a review and investigation pertaining to the rate plan comparison tool offered to APS customers and other related issues. Cost Recovery Mechanisms APS has received regulatory decisions that allow for more timely recovery of certain costs outside of a general retail rate case through the following recovery mechanisms. See “2022 Retail Rate Case” above for proposed modifications of adjustment mechanisms in the 2022 Rate Case. Renewable Energy Standard. In 2006, the ACC approved the RES. Under the RES, electric utilities that are regulated by the ACC must supply an increasing percentage of their retail electric energy sales from eligible renewable resources, including solar, wind, biomass, biogas and geothermal technologies. In order to achieve these requirements, the ACC allows APS to include a RES surcharge as part of customer bills to recover the approved amounts for use on renewable energy projects. Each year, APS is required to file a five-year implementation plan with the ACC and seek approval for funding the upcoming year’s RES budget. In 2015, the ACC revised the RES rules to allow the ACC to consider all available information, including the number of rooftop solar arrays in a utility’s service territory, to determine compliance with the RES. On July 1, 2020, APS filed its 2021 RES Implementation Plan and proposed a budget of approximately $84.7 million. APS’s budget request supported existing approved projects and commitments and requested a permanent waiver of the RES residential distributed energy requirement for 2021. In the 2021 RES Implementation Plan, APS requested $4.5 million to meet revenue requirements associated with the APS Solar Communities program to complete installations delayed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The APS Solar Communities program was originally a 3-year program authorizing APS to spend $10 million to $15 million in capital costs each year to install utility-owned distributed renewable energy (“DG”) systems for low to moderate income residential homes, non-profit entities, Title I schools and rural government facilities. On June 7, 2021, the ACC approved the 2021 RES Implementation Plan, including APS’s requested waiver of the residential distributed energy requirements for 2021. As part of the approval, the ACC approved the requested budget and authorized APS to collect $68.3 million through the REAC to support APS’s RES programs. In June 2021, the ACC adopted a clean energy rules package which would require APS to meet certain clean energy standards and technology procurement mandates, obtain approval for its action plan included in its integrated resource plan (“IRP”), and seek cost recovery in a rate process. Since the adopted clean energy rules differed substantially from the original Recommended Order and Opinion, supplemental rulemaking procedures were required before the rules could become effective. On January 26, 2022, the ACC reversed its prior decision and declined to send the final draft energy rules through the rulemaking process. Instead, the ACC opened a new docket to consider all-source requests for proposals (“RFP”) requirements and the IRP process. See “Energy Modernization Plan” below for more information. On July 1, 2021, APS filed its 2022 RES Implementation Plan and proposed a budget of approximately $93.1 million. APS filed an amended 2022 RES Implementation Plan on December 9, 2021, with a proposed budget of $100.5 million. This budget included funding for programs to comply with the decision in the 2019 Rate Case, including the ACC authorizing spending $20 million to $30 million in capital costs for the continuation of the APS Solar Communities program each year for a period of three years from the effective date of the 2019 Rate Case decision. APS’s budget proposal supported existing approved projects and commitments and requests a waiver of the RES residential and non-residential distributed energy requirements for 2022. On May 18, 2022, the ACC approved the 2022 RES Implementation Plan, including an amendment requiring a stakeholder working group convene to develop a community solar program for the Commission’s consideration at a future date. On September 23, 2022, APS filed a community solar proposal in compliance with the ACC order that was informed by a stakeholder working group. APS proposed a small, pilot-scale program size of up to 140 MW that would be selected through a competitive RFP. The ACC has not yet ruled on the proposal. However, on November 10, 2022, the ACC approved a bifurcated community solar process, directing ACC Staff to develop a statewide policy through additional stakeholder involvement and establishing a separate evidentiary hearing to define other policy components. The community solar program was deferred to the ACC’s Hearing Division so that a formal evidentiary hearing could be held to consider issues of substance related to community solar. APS cannot predict the outcomes of these future activities. On July 1, 2022, APS filed its 2023 RES Implementation Plan and proposed a budget of approximately $86.2 million, excluding any funding offsets. This budget contained funding for programs to comply with Commission-approved initiatives, including the 2019 Rate Case decision. APS’s budget proposal supported existing approved projects and commitments and requested a waiver of the RES residential and non-residential distributed energy requirements for 2022. On November 10, 2022, the ACC approved the 2023 RES Implementation Plan, including APS’s requested waiver of the distributed energy requirement for 2023. On June 30, 2023, APS filed its 2024 RES Implementation Plan and proposed a budget of approximately $95.1 million. APS’s budget proposal supports existing approved projects and commitments and requests a waiver of the RES renewable energy credit requirements to demonstrate compliance with the Annual Renewable Energy Requirement for 2023. The ACC has not yet ruled on the 2024 RES Implementation Plan. Demand Side Management Adjustor Charge. The ACC Electric Energy Efficiency Standards (“EES”) require APS to submit a DSM Plan annually for review and approval by the ACC. Verified energy savings from APS’s resource savings projects can be counted toward compliance with the Electric Energy Efficiency Standards; however, APS is not allowed to count savings from systems savings projects toward determination of the achievement of performance incentives, nor may APS include savings from these system savings projects in the calculation of its LFCR mechanism. See below for discussion of the LFCR. On December 31, 2019, APS filed its 2020 DSM Plan, which requested a budget of $51.9 million and continued APS’s focus on DSM strategies such as peak demand reduction, load shifting, storage and electrification strategies. The 2020 DSM Plan addressed all components of the pending 2018 and 2019 DSM plans, which enabled the ACC to review the 2020 DSM Plan only. On May 15, 2020, APS filed an amended 2020 DSM Plan to provide assistance to customers experiencing economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. The amended 2020 DSM Plan requested the same budget amount of $51.9 million. On September 23, 2020, the ACC approved the amended 2020 DSM Plan. On April 17, 2020, APS filed an application with the ACC requesting a COVID-19 emergency relief package to provide additional assistance to its customers. On May 5, 2020, the ACC approved APS returning $36 million that had been collected through the DSM Adjustor Charge, but not allocated for current DSM programs, directly to customers through a bill credit in June 2020. APS refunded approximately $43 million to customers. The additional $7 million over the ACC-approved amount was the result of the kWh credit being based on historic consumption, which was different than actual consumption during the refund period. The difference was recorded to the DSM balancing account and was included in the 2021 DSM Implementation Plan, as described below. On December 31, 2020, APS filed its 2021 DSM Implementation Plan, which requested a budget of $63.7 million and continued APS’s focus on DSM strategies, such as peak demand reduction, load shifting, storage and electrification strategies, as well as enhanced assistance to customers impacted economically by COVID-19. On April 6, 2021, APS filed an amended 2021 DSM Implementation Plan that proposed an additional one-time incentive for customers participating in the residential energy storage pilot program approved in the 2020 RES Implementation Plan. On July 13, 2021, the ACC approved the amended 2021 DSM Implementation Plan. On December 17, 2021, APS filed its 2022 DSM Implementation Plan in accordance with an extension granted in 2021. The 2022 DSM Plan requested a budget of $78.4 million and represents an increase of approximately $14 million in DSM spending above 2021. On November 10, 2022, the ACC approved the 2022 DSM Implementation Plan, including a proposed performance incentive. On November 30, 2022, APS filed its 2023 DSM Implementation Plan, which requested a budget of $88 million. On May 31, 2023, APS filed an amended 2023 DSM Implementation Plan. The amended plan maintains the originally proposed budget of $88 million. The ACC has not yet ruled on the 2023 DSM Implementation Plan. In accordance with an extension granted by the ACC, APS intends to file its 2024 DSM Implementation Plan by November 30, 2023. Power Supply Adjustor Mechanism and Balance. The PSA provides for the adjustment of retail rates to reflect variations primarily in retail fuel and purchased power costs. The PSA is subject to specified parameters and procedures, including the following: •APS records deferrals for recovery or refund to the extent actual retail fuel and purchased power costs vary from the Base Fuel Rate; •an adjustment to the PSA rate is made annually each February 1 (unless otherwise approved by the ACC) and goes into effect automatically unless suspended by the ACC; •the PSA uses a forward-looking estimate of fuel and purchased power costs to set the annual PSA rate, which is reconciled to actual costs experienced for each PSA Year (February 1 through January 31) (see the following bullet point); •the PSA rate includes (a) a “forward component,” under which APS recovers or refunds differences between expected fuel and purchased power costs for the upcoming calendar year and those embedded in the Base Fuel Rate; (b) a “historical component,” under which differences between actual fuel and purchased power costs and those recovered or refunded through the combination of the Base Fuel Rate and the Forward Component are recovered during the next PSA Year; and (c) a “transition component,” under which APS may seek mid-year PSA changes due to large variances between actual fuel and purchased power costs and the combination of the Base Fuel Rate and the Forward Component; and •the PSA rate may not be increased or decreased more than $0.004 per kWh in a year without permission of the ACC. The following table shows the changes in the deferred fuel and purchased power regulatory asset for 2023 and 2022 (dollars in thousands):
On November 30, 2020, APS filed its PSA rate for the PSA year beginning February 1, 2021. That rate was $0.003544 per kWh, which consisted of a forward component of $0.003434 per kWh and a historical component of $0.000110 per kWh. The 2021 PSA rate was a $0.004 per kWh increase compared to the 2020 PSA year, which is the maximum permitted under the Plan of Administration for the PSA. This left $215.9 million of fuel and purchased power costs above this annual cap which was reflected in future year resets of the PSA. These rates were to be effective on February 1, 2021, but APS delayed the effectiveness of these rates until the first billing cycle of April 2021 due to concerns of the impact on customers during COVID-19. In March 2021, the ACC voted to implement the 2021 PSA rate on a staggered basis, with 50% of the rate increase taking effect in April 2021, and the remaining 50% taking effect in November 2021. The PSA rate implemented on April 1, 2021 was $0.001544 per kWh, which consisted of a forward component of $(0.004444) per kWh and a historical component of $0.005988 per kWh. On November 1, 2021, the remaining increase was implemented to a rate of $0.003544 per kWh and consisted of a forward component of $(0.004444) per kWh and a historical component of $0.007988 per kWh. As part of this approval, the ACC ordered ACC Staff to conduct a fuel and purchased power procurement audit to better understand the factors that contributed to the increase in fuel costs. On April 1, 2022, the ACC filed a final report of its third-party audit findings regarding APS’s fuel and purchased power costs for the period January 2019 through January 2021. The report contains an in-depth review of APS’s fuel and purchased power contracts, its monthly fuel accounting activities, its forecasting and dispatching procedures, and its monthly PSA filings, among other fuel-related activities. The report finds that APS’s fuel processing accounting practices, dispatching procedures, and procedures for hedging activity are reasonable and appropriate. The report includes several recommendations for the ACC’s consideration, including review of current contracts, maintenance schedules, and certain changes and improvements to the schedules in APS’s monthly PSA filings. On December 27, 2022, ACC Staff filed a proposed order supporting adoption of the recommendations in the third-party audit report, and the ACC approved the proposed order on February 22, 2023. On November 30, 2021, APS filed its PSA rate for the PSA year beginning February 1, 2022. That rate was $0.007544 per kWh, which consisted of a forward component of $(0.004842) per kWh and a historical component of $0.012386 per kWh. The 2022 PSA rate was a $0.004 per kWh increase compared to the 2021 PSA year, which is the maximum permitted under the Plan of Administration for the PSA. These rates went into effect as filed on February 1, 2022. On November 30, 2022, APS filed its PSA rate for the PSA year beginning February 1, 2023. To address the growing under-collected PSA balance, APS also requested that one of three different options be adopted, including a temporary or permanent increase of the annual cap to $0.006 per kWh. On February 23, 2023, the ACC approved an overall PSA rate of $0.019074 per kWh, which consisted of a forward component of $(0.005527) per kWh, a historical component of $0.013071 per kWh and a transition component of $0.011530 per kWh, that will continue until further notice of the ACC. The rate became effective with the first billing cycle in March 2023 and is designed to bring the PSA balancing account to near-zero over a 24-month period. APS is also required to notify the ACC when the PSA balancing account approaches $0.5 million. In accordance with the PSA Plan of Administration, APS is required to seek ACC approval to recover costs related to third-party energy storage systems through its PSA adjustment mechanism. To date in 2023, APS has executed six energy storage PPAs whose costs have been approved for recovery through the PSA. APS executed one energy storage PPA in 2022 that was approved for cost-recovery through the PSA and four in 2021, excluding one energy storage PPA that was approved but later terminated by APS due to project delays. Environmental Improvement Surcharge. The EIS permits APS to recover the capital carrying costs (rate of return, depreciation and taxes) plus incremental operations and maintenance expenses associated with environmental improvements made outside of a test year to comply with environmental standards set by federal, state, tribal, or local laws and regulations. A filing is made on or before February 1 each year for qualified environmental improvements since the prior rate case test year, and the new charge becomes effective April 1 unless suspended by the ACC. The EIS includes an overall cap of $0.0005 per kWh (approximately $13 million to $15 million per year). APS’s February 1, 2023 application requested an increase in the charge to $14.7 million, or $3.3 million over the prior-period charge. On March 10, 2023, APS filed an amended application requesting an EIS charge of $4.0 million, a decrease of $10.7 million from the February EIS request and a decrease of $7.5 million from the prior-period charge. The revised 2023 EIS became effective with the first billing cycle in April 2023. Transmission Rates, Transmission Cost Adjustor and Other Transmission Matters. In July 2008, FERC approved a modification to APS’s Open Access Transmission Tariff to allow APS to move from fixed rates to a formula rate-setting methodology in order to more accurately reflect and recover the costs that APS incurs in providing transmission services. A large portion of the rate represents charges for transmission services to serve APS’s retail customers (“Retail Transmission Charges”). In order to recover the Retail Transmission Charges, APS was previously required to file an application with, and obtain approval from, the ACC to reflect changes in Retail Transmission Charges through the TCA. Under the terms of the settlement agreement entered into in 2012 regarding APS’s rate case (“2012 Settlement Agreement”), however, an adjustment to rates to recover the Retail Transmission Charges will be made annually each June 1 and will go into effect automatically unless suspended by the ACC. The formula rate is updated each year effective June 1 on the basis of APS’s actual cost of service, as disclosed in APS’s FERC Form 1 report for the previous fiscal year. Items to be updated include actual capital expenditures made as compared with previous projections, transmission revenue credits and other items. APS reviews the proposed formula rate filing amounts with the ACC Staff. Any items or adjustments which are not agreed to by APS and the ACC Staff can remain in dispute until settled or litigated with FERC. Settlement or litigated resolution of disputed issues could require an extended period of time and could have a significant effect on the Retail Transmission Charges because any adjustment, though applied prospectively, may be calculated to account for previously over- or under-collected amounts. The resolution of proposed adjustments can result in significant volatility in the revenues to be collected. On March 17, 2020, APS submitted a filing to make modifications to its annual transmission formula to provide additional transparency for excess and deficient accumulated deferred income taxes resulting from the Tax Cuts and Job Act (the “Tax Act”), as well as for future local, state, and federal statutory tax rate changes. APS amended its March 17, 2020 filing on April 28, 2020, September 29, 2021, and October 27, 2021. In January 2022, FERC approved APS’s modifications to its annual transmission formula. Effective June 1, 2021, APS’s annual wholesale transmission revenue requirement for all users of its transmission system increased by approximately $4 million for the 12-month period beginning June 1, 2021, in accordance with the FERC-approved formula. Of this net amount, wholesale customer rates decreased by approximately $3.2 million and retail customer rates would have increased by approximately $7.2 million. However, since changes in Retail Transmission Charges are reflected through the TCA after consideration of transmission recovery in retail base rates and the ACC-approved balancing account, the retail revenue requirement decreased by $28.4 million, resulting in reductions to both residential and commercial rates. An adjustment to APS’s retail rates to recover FERC-approved transmission charges went into effect automatically on June 1, 2021. Effective June 1, 2022, APS’s annual wholesale transmission revenue requirement for all users of its transmission system decreased by approximately $33 million for the 12-month period beginning June 1, 2022, in accordance with the FERC-approved formula. Of this net amount, wholesale customer rates decreased by approximately $6.4 million and retail customer rates would have decreased by approximately $26.6 million. However, since changes in Retail Transmission Charges are reflected through the TCA after consideration of transmission recovery in retail base rates and the ACC approved balancing account, the retail revenue requirement decreased by $2.4 million, resulting in a reduction to the residential rate and increases to commercial rates. An adjustment to APS’s retail rates to recover FERC-approved transmission charges went into effect automatically on June 1, 2022. Effective June 1, 2023, APS’s annual wholesale transmission revenue requirement for all users of its transmission system increased by approximately $34.7 million for the 12-month period beginning June 1, 2023, in accordance with the FERC-approved formula. Of this net amount, wholesale customer rates increased by approximately $20.7 million and retail customer rates would have increased by approximately $14 million. However, since changes in Retail Transmission Charges are reflected through the TCA after consideration of transmission recovery in retail base rates and the ACC approved balancing account, the retail revenue requirement decreased by $10 million, resulting in reductions to the residential and commercial rates. An adjustment to APS’s retail rates to recover FERC-approved transmission charges went into effect automatically on June 1, 2023. Lost Fixed Cost Recovery Mechanism. The LFCR mechanism permits APS to recover on an after-the-fact basis a portion of its fixed costs that would otherwise have been collected by APS in the kWh sales lost due to APS energy efficiency programs and to DG such as rooftop solar arrays. The fixed costs recoverable by the LFCR mechanism were 2.50 cents for both lost residential and non-residential kWh as set forth in the 2017 Settlement Agreement. The fixed costs recoverable by the LFCR mechanism are currently 2.56 cents for lost residential kWh and 2.68 cents for lost non-residential kWh as set forth in the 2019 Rate Case decision. The LFCR adjustment has a year-over-year cap of 1% of retail revenues. Any amounts left unrecovered in a particular year because of this cap can be carried over for recovery in a future year. The kWhs lost from energy efficiency are based on a third-party evaluation of APS’s energy efficiency programs. DG sales losses are determined from the metered output from the DG units. On February 15, 2021, APS filed its 2021 annual LFCR adjustment, requesting that effective May 1, 2021, the annual LFCR recovery amount be increased to $38.5 million (an $11.8 million increase from previous levels). On April 13, 2021, the ACC voted not to approve the requested $11.8 million increase to the annual LFCR adjustment; thus, the previously approved rates continued to remain intact and the $11.8 million increase was reflected in APS’s 2022 filing in accordance with the compliance requirements. As a result of the 2019 Rate Case decision, APS’s annual LFCR adjustor rate will be dependent on an annual earnings test filing, which will compare APS’s previous year’s rate of return with the related authorized rate of return. If the actual rate of return is higher than the authorized rate of return, the LFCR rate for the subsequent year is set at zero. APS determined that the changes to the LFCR mechanism, as a result of the 2019 Rate Case decision effective on December 1, 2021, did not materially impact its results of operations and financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021. However, as a result of certain changes made to the LFCR mechanism in the 2019 Rate Case decision, the mechanism no longer qualified for alternative revenue program accounting treatment, which impacts the future timing of related revenue recognition. On February 15, 2022, APS filed its 2022 annual LFCR adjustment, requesting that effective May 1, 2022, the annual LFCR recovery amount be increased to $59.1 million (a $32.5 million increase from previous levels, which was inclusive of the $11.8 million balance from the 2021 filing). On May 9, 2022, the ACC Staff filed its revised report and proposed order regarding APS’s 2022 LFCR adjustment, concluding that APS calculated the adjustment in accordance with its Plan of Administration. On May 18, 2022, the ACC approved the 2022 LFCR adjustment, with a rate effective date of June 1, 2022. On February 15, 2023, APS filed a letter to the ACC docket stating that, in accordance with Decision No. 78585, APS and ACC Staff have agreed to move the filing date for the annual LFCR adjustment to July 31 each year. On July 31, 2023, APS filed its 2023 annual LFCR adjustment, requesting that effective November 1, 2023, the annual LFCR recovery amount be increased to $68.7 million (a $9.6 million increase from previous levels). The ACC has not yet ruled on this application. Tax Expense Adjustor Mechanism. As part of the 2017 Settlement Agreement, the parties agreed to a rate adjustment mechanism to address potential federal income tax reform and enable the pass-through of certain income tax effects to customers. The TEAM expressly applies to APS’s retail rates with the exception of a small subset of customers taking service under specially-approved tariffs. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Act was enacted. This legislation made significant changes to the federal income tax laws including a reduction in the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. On August 13, 2018, APS filed a request with the ACC that addressed the return of $86.5 million in tax savings to customers related to the amortization of non-depreciation related excess deferred taxes previously collected from customers (“TEAM Phase II”). The ACC approved this request on March 13, 2019, effective the first billing cycle in April 2019 through the last billing cycle in March 2020. On March 19, 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, APS delayed the discontinuation of TEAM Phase II until the first billing cycle in May 2020. Amounts credited to customers after the last billing cycle in March 2020 were recorded as a part of the balancing account and were addressed for recovery as part of the 2019 Rate Case. Both the timing of the reduction in revenues refunded through TEAM Phase II and the offsetting income tax benefit were recognized based upon our seasonal kWh sales pattern. On April 10, 2019, APS filed a third request with the ACC that addressed the amortization of depreciation related excess deferred taxes over a 28.5-year period consistent with IRS normalization rules (“TEAM Phase III”). On October 29, 2019, the ACC approved TEAM Phase III providing both (i) a one-time bill credit of $64 million which was credited to customers on their December 2019 bills, and (ii) a monthly bill credit effective the first billing cycle in December 2019 which provided an additional benefit of $39.5 million to customers through December 31, 2020. On November 20, 2020, APS filed an application to continue the TEAM Phase III monthly bill credit through the earlier of December 31, 2021, or at the conclusion of the 2019 Rate Case. On December 9, 2020, the ACC approved this request. Both the timing of the reduction in revenues refunded through the TEAM Phase III monthly bill credit and the offsetting income tax benefit were recognized based upon APS’s seasonal kWh sales pattern. As part of the 2019 Rate Case decision, the TEAM rates were reset to zero beginning December 31, 2021, and all impacts of the Tax Act were removed from the TEAM and incorporated into APS’s base rates. The TEAM was retained to address potential changes in tax law that may be enacted prior to a decision in a subsequent APS rate case. Court Resolution Surcharge (“CRS”). The CRS mechanism permits APS to recover certain costs associated with investments and expenses for APS’s purchase and installation of SCR technology for Four Corners Units 4 and 5 and a change in APS’s allowable return on equity as required by the Arizona Court of Appeals and approved by the ACC in Decision No. 78979. The CRS went into effect on July 1, 2023 at a rate of $0.00175 per kWh. The rate is designed to recover $59.6 million in revenue lost by APS between December of 2021 and June 20, 2023, and the prospective recovery of ongoing costs related to the SCR investments and expense and the allowable return on equity difference in current base rates. The current CRS will be recalculated at the end of the 2022 Rate Case to remove the effects of the prospective recovery related to the allowable return on equity difference. The portion of the CRS representing the recovery of lost revenue between December of 2021 and June 20, 2023 will cease upon full collection of the lost revenue. Finally, recovery of ongoing costs related to the SCR investments will continue until the Company’s next rate case in which they can be incorporated therein. See “2019 Retail Rate Case” above for more information. Net Metering APS’s 2017 Rate Case Decision provides that payments by utilities for energy exported to the grid from residential DG solar facilities will be determined using a Resource Comparison Proxy (“RCP”) methodology as determined in the ACC’s generic Value and Cost of Distributed Generation docket. RCP is a method that is based on the most recent five-year rolling average price that APS incurs for utility-scale solar photovoltaic projects. The price established by this RCP method will be updated annually (between general retail rate cases) but will not be decreased by more than 10% per year. The ACC is no longer pursuing development of a forecasted avoided cost methodology as an option for utilities in place of the RCP. Commercial customers, grandfathered residential solar customers, and residential customers with DG systems other than solar facilities continue to qualify for net metering. In addition, the ACC made the following determinations in the Value and Cost of Distributed Generation docket: •RCP customers who have interconnected a DG system or submitted an application for interconnection for DG systems will be grandfathered for a period of 20 years from the date the customer’s interconnection application was accepted by the utility (for APS residential customers, as of September 1, 2017, based on APS’s 2017 Rate Case Decision); •customers with DG solar systems are to be considered a separate class of customers for ratemaking purposes; and •once an initial export price is set for utilities, no netting or banking of retail credits will be available for new DG customers, and the then-applicable export price will be guaranteed for new customers for a period of 10 years. This decision of the ACC addresses policy determinations only. The decision states that its principles will be applied in future general retail rate cases, and the policy determinations themselves may be subject to future change, as are all ACC policies. In accordance with the 2017 Rate Case Decision, APS filed its request for a RCP export energy price of 10.5 cents per kWh on May 1, 2019. This price also reflects the 10% annual reduction discussed above. The new rate rider became effective on October 1, 2019. APS filed its request for a fourth-year export energy price of 9.4 cents per kWh on May 1, 2020, with a requested effective date of September 1, 2020. This price reflects the 10% annual reduction discussed above. On September 23, 2020, the ACC approved the annual reduction of the export energy price but voted to delay the effectiveness of the reduction in export prices until October 1, 2021. In accordance with this decision, the RCP export energy price of 9.4 cents per kWh became effective on October 1, 2021. On April 29, 2022, APS filed an application to decrease the RCP price to 8.46 cents per kWh, reflecting a 10% annual reduction, to become effective September 1, 2022. On July 12, 2022, the ACC approved the RCP as filed. On May 1, 2023, APS filed an application for revisions to the RCP. This application would decrease the RCP price to 7.619 cents per kWh, reflecting a 10% annual reduction, to become effective September 1, 2023. The ACC has not yet ruled on this application. Energy Modernization Plan On January 30, 2018, the initial Energy Modernization Plan was proposed, which consisted of a series of energy policies tied to clean energy sources. Draft energy rules were subsequently issued and a series of revisions were made to the draft rules in 2019 and 2020. On July 30, 2020, the ACC Staff issued final draft energy rules which proposed 100% of retail kWh sales from clean energy resources by the end of 2050. Nuclear power was defined as a clean energy resource. The proposed rules also required 50% of retail energy served be renewable by the end of 2035. A new EES was not included in the proposed rules. The ACC discussed the final draft energy rules at several different meetings in 2020 and 2021. On November 13, 2020, the ACC approved a final draft energy rules package. On April 19, 2021, the Administrative Law Judge issued a Recommended Order and Opinion on the final energy rules. In June 2021, the ACC adopted revised clean energy rules based on a series of ACC amendments. The adopted rules included a final standard of 100% clean energy by 2070 and the following interim standards for carbon reduction from baseline carbon emissions level: 50% reduction by December 31, 2032; 65% reduction by December 31, 2040; 80% reduction by December 31, 2050, and 95% reduction by December 31, 2060. Since the adopted clean energy rules differed substantially from the original Recommended Order and Opinion, supplemental rulemaking procedures were required before the rules could become effective. On January 26, 2022, the ACC reversed its prior decision and declined to send the final draft energy rules through the rulemaking process. Instead, the ACC opened a new docket to consider all-source RFP requirements and the IRP process. During the August 2022 Open Meeting, Commissioners voted to postpone a decision on the all-source RFP and IRP rulemaking package until 2023. APS cannot predict the outcome of this matter. Integrated Resource Planning ACC rules require utilities to develop triennial 15-year IRPs which describe how the utility plans to serve customer load in the plan timeframe. The ACC reviews each utility’s IRP to determine if it meets the necessary requirements and whether it should be acknowledged. In February 2022, the ACC acknowledged APS’s 2020 IRP filed on June 26, 2020. The ACC also approved certain amendments to the IRP process, including, setting an EES of 1.3% of retail sales annually (averaged over a three-year period) and a demand-side resource capacity of 35% of 2020 peak demand by January 1, 2030. On May 1, 2023, APS, Tucson Electric Power Company, and UNS Electric, Inc. filed a joint request for an extension to file the IRPs from August 1, 2023 to November 1, 2023. On June 21, 2023, the ACC granted the extension. As a result, APS intends to file its next IRP on November 1, 2023. See “Energy Modernization Plan” above for information regarding proposed changes to the IRP filings. Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act Under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (“PURPA”), qualifying facilities are provided the right to sell energy and/or capacity to utilities and are granted relief from certain regulatory burdens. On December 17, 2019, the ACC mandated a minimum contract length of 18 years for qualifying facilities over 100 kW in Arizona and established that the rate paid to qualifying facilities must be based on the long-term avoided cost. “Avoided cost” is generally defined as the price at which the utility could purchase or produce the same amount of power from sources other than the qualifying facility on a long-term basis. During calendar year 2020, APS entered into two 18-year PPAs with qualified facilities, each for 80 MW solar facilities. In March 2021, the ACC approved these agreements. On July 16, 2020, FERC issued a final rule revising FERC’s regulations implementing PURPA. The final rule went into effect on December 31, 2020. Residential Electric Utility Customer Service Disconnections On June 13, 2019, APS voluntarily suspended electric disconnections for residential customers who had not paid their bills. On June 20, 2019, the ACC voted to enact emergency rule amendments to prevent residential electric utility customer service disconnections during the period June 1 through October 15 (“Summer Disconnection Moratorium”). During the Summer Disconnection Moratorium, APS could not charge late fees and interest on amounts that were past due from customers. Customer deposits must also be used to pay delinquent amounts before disconnection can occur. In accordance with the emergency rules, APS began putting delinquent customers on a mandatory four-month payment plan beginning on October 16, 2019. In June 2019, the ACC began a formal regular rulemaking process to allow stakeholder input and time for consideration of permanent rule changes. The ACC further ordered that each regulated utility serving retail customers in Arizona update its service conditions by incorporating the emergency rule amendments, restore power to any customers who were disconnected during the month of June 2019 and credit any fees that were charged for a reconnection. The ACC Staff and ACC proposed draft amendments to the customer service disconnections rules. On April 14, 2021, the ACC voted to send to the formal rulemaking process a draft rules package governing customer disconnections that allows utilities to choose between a temperature threshold (above 95 degrees and below 32 degrees) or calendar method (June 1 – October 15) for disconnection moratoriums. On November 2, 2021, the ACC approved the final rules, and on November 23, 2021, the rules were submitted to the Arizona Office of the Attorney General for final review and approval. The new rules became effective on April 18, 2022. In accordance with the ACC service disconnection rules, APS now uses the calendar-based method to suspend the disconnection of customers for nonpayment from June 1 through October 15 each year (“Annual Disconnection Moratorium”). Customers with past due balances of $75 or greater as of the end of the Annual Disconnection Moratorium are automatically placed on six-month payment arrangements. In addition, APS voluntarily began waiving late payment fees of its customers (“Late Fee Waivers”) on March 13, 2020. Effective February 1, 2023, late payment fees for residential customers were reinstated. Late payment fees for commercial and industrial customers were reinstated effective May 1, 2022. Since the suspensions and moratoriums on disconnections began, APS has experienced an increase in bad debt expense and the related write-offs of delinquent customer accounts. Retail Electric Competition Rules On November 17, 2018, the ACC voted to re-examine the facilitation of a deregulated retail electric market in Arizona. On July 1 and July 2, 2019, ACC Staff issued a report and initial proposed draft rules regarding possible modifications to the ACC’s retail electric competition rules. On February 10, 2020, two ACC Commissioners filed two sets of draft proposed retail electric competition rules. On February 12, 2020, ACC Staff issued its second report regarding possible modifications to the ACC’s retail electric competition rules. During a July 15, 2020, ACC Staff meeting, the ACC Commissioners discussed the possible development of a retail competition pilot program, but no action was taken. The ACC continues to discuss matters related to retail electric competition, including the potential for additional buy-through programs or other pilot programs. In April 2022, the Arizona Legislature passed and the Governor signed a bill that repealed the electric deregulation law that had been in place in Arizona since 1998. APS cannot predict what impact, if any, this change will have on APS. On August 4, 2021, Green Mountain Energy filed an application seeking a certificate of convenience and necessity to allow it to provide competitive electric generation service in Arizona. Green Mountain Energy has requested that the ACC grant it the ability to provide competitive service in APS’s and Tucson Electric Power Company’s certificated service territories and proposes to deliver a 100% renewable energy product to residential and general service customers in those service territories. APS opposes Green Mountain Energy’s application. On November 3, 2021, the ACC submitted questions to the Arizona Attorney General requesting legal opinions related to a number of issues surrounding retail electric competition and the ACC’s ability to issue competitive certificates of convenience and necessity. On November 26, 2021, the Administrative Law Judge issued a procedural order indicating it would not be appropriate to set a schedule until the Attorney General has provided his insights on the applicable law. As the ACC’s questions pertained to the retail competition law subsequently repealed in April 2022, the Attorney General has not responded to the ACC’s request and the questions are now moot. No action has been taken by the ACC regarding this application since that time. However, on May 17, 2023, the Retail Energy Supply Association filed a motion with the ACC requesting it to re-open the generic docket to re-examine the ACC’s electric competition rules. No action has been taken by the ACC regarding this motion. APS cannot predict the outcome of these matters. On October 28, 2021, an ACC Commissioner docketed a letter directing ACC Staff and interested stakeholders to design a 200 to 300 MW pilot program that would allow residential and small commercial customers of APS to elect a competitive electricity supplier. The letter also states that similar programs should be designed for other Arizona regulated electric utilities. APS cannot predict the outcome of these future activities. Rate Plan Comparison Tool and Investigation On November 14, 2019, APS learned that its rate plan comparison tool was not functioning as intended due to an integration error between the tool and APS’s meter data management system. APS immediately removed the tool from its website and notified the ACC. The purpose of the tool was to provide customers with a rate plan recommendation based upon historical usage data. Upon investigation, APS determined that the error may have affected rate plan recommendations to customers between February 4, 2019, and November 14, 2019. By the middle of May 2020, APS provided refunds to approximately 13,000 potentially impacted customers equal to the difference between what they paid for electricity and the amount they would have paid had they selected their most economical rate, as applicable, and a $25 payment for any inconvenience that the customer may have experienced. The refunds and payment for inconvenience being provided did not have a material impact on APS’s financial statements. In February 2020, APS launched a new online rate comparison tool. The ACC hired an outside consultant to evaluate the extent of the error and the overall effectiveness of the tool. On August 20, 2020, ACC Staff filed the outside consultant’s report on APS’s rate comparison tool. The report concluded APS’s new rate comparison tool is working as intended. The report also identified a small population of additional customers that may have been affected by the error and APS has provided refunds and the $25 inconvenience payment to approximately 3,800 additional customers. These additional refunds and payment for inconvenience did not have a material impact on APS’s financial statements. On September 28, 2020, the ACC discussed this report but did not take any action. APS cannot predict whether additional inquiries or actions may be taken by the ACC. Four Corners SCR Cost Recovery On December 29, 2017, in accordance with the 2017 Rate Case Decision, APS filed a Notice of Intent to file its SCR Adjustment to permit recovery of costs associated with the installation of SCR equipment at Four Corners Units 4 and 5. APS filed the SCR Adjustment request in April 2018. The SCR Adjustment request provided that there would be a $67.5 million annual revenue impact that would be applied as a percentage of base rates for all applicable customers. Also, as provided for in the 2017 Rate Case Decision, APS requested that the adjustment become effective no later than January 1, 2019. The hearing for this matter occurred in September 2018. At the hearing, APS accepted ACC Staff’s recommendation of a lower annual revenue impact of approximately $58.5 million. The Administrative Law Judge issued a Recommended Opinion and Order finding that the costs for the SCR project were prudently incurred and recommending authorization of the $58.5 million annual revenue requirement related to the installation and operation of the SCRs. The ACC did not issue a decision on this matter. APS included the costs for the SCR project in the retail rate base in its 2019 Rate Case filing with the ACC. On November 2, 2021, the 2019 Rate Case decision was approved by the ACC allowing approximately $194 million of SCR related plant investments and cost deferrals in rate base and to recover, depreciate and amortize in rates based on an end-of-life assumption of July 2031. The decision also included a partial and combined disallowance of $215.5 million on the SCR investments and deferrals. APS believes the SCR plant investments and related SCR cost deferrals were prudently incurred, and on December 17, 2021, APS filed its Notice of Direct Appeal at the Arizona Court of Appeals requesting review of the $215.5 million disallowance. The Arizona Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on November 30, 2022. On March 6, 2023, the Court of Appeals issued its order in the matter, vacating the ACC’s disallowance of the SCR investment and remanding the matter back to the ACC for further review in accordance with ACC rules and the order of the Court of Appeals. On June 21, 2023, the ACC approved a joint settlement filed by APS and the ACC’s Legal Division that resolved all issues relating to the 2019 Rate Case decision, including recovery of the cost of the Four Corners SCRs. See above for further discussion on the 2019 Rate Case decision. Cholla On September 11, 2014, APS announced that it would close Unit 2 of Cholla and cease burning coal at the other APS-owned units (Units 1 and 3) at the plant by the mid-2020s, if EPA approved a compromise proposal offered by APS to meet required environmental and emissions standards and rules. On April 14, 2015, the ACC approved APS’s plan to retire Unit 2, without expressing any view on the future recoverability of APS’s remaining investment in the unit. APS closed Unit 2 on October 1, 2015. In early 2017, EPA approved a final rule incorporating APS’s compromise proposal, which took effect on April 26, 2017. In December 2019, PacifiCorp notified APS that it planned to retire Cholla Unit 4 by the end of 2020 and the unit ceased operation in December 2020. APS is required to cease burning coal at its remaining Cholla units by April 2025. Previously, APS estimated Cholla Unit 2’s end of life to be 2033. APS has been recovering a return on and of the net book value of the unit in base rates. Pursuant to the 2017 Settlement Agreement described above, APS will be allowed continued recovery of the net book value of the unit and the unit’s decommissioning and other retirement-related costs, $34.9 million as of June 30, 2023, in addition to a return on its investment. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), in the third quarter of 2014, Unit 2’s remaining net book value was reclassified from property, plant and equipment to a regulatory asset. In accordance with the 2019 Rate Case decision, the regulatory asset is being amortized through 2033. Navajo Plant The Navajo Plant ceased operations in November 2019. The co-owners and the Navajo Nation executed a lease extension on November 29, 2017, that allows for decommissioning activities to begin after the plant ceased operations. In accordance with GAAP, in the second quarter of 2017, APS’s remaining net book value of its interest in the Navajo Plant was reclassified from property, plant and equipment to a regulatory asset. APS has been recovering a return on and of the net book value of its interest in the Navajo plant in base rates over its previously estimated life through 2026. Pursuant to the 2019 Rate Case decision described above, APS will be allowed continued recovery of the book value of its remaining investment in the Navajo plant, $47.8 million as of June 30, 2023, in addition to a return on the net book value, with the exception of 15% of the annual amortization expense in rates. In addition, APS will be allowed recovery of other costs related to retirement and closure, including the Navajo coal reclamation regulatory asset, $12.4 million as of June 30, 2023. The disallowed recovery of 15% of the annual amortization does not have a material impact on APS financial statements. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Board and Officer Elections, Retirements, Resignations and Changes During Second Quarter 2023: Directors – Note – all of the Directors are voted on or reappointed in May. Officers – Note – all of the officers are re-elected in May. •Dale E. Klein retired the Board of Directors effective May 17, 2023 •David P. Wagener resigned from the Board of Directors effective April 27, 2023 •Shannon Standaert elected VP, Human Resources on June 21, 2023, to be effective June 26, 2023. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET (ASSETS AND OTHER DEBITS) |
||||
Line No. |
Title of Account (a) |
Ref. Page No. (b) |
Current Year End of Quarter/Year Balance (c) |
Prior Year End Balance 12/31 (d) |
1 |
UtilityPlantAbstract UTILITY PLANT |
|||
2 |
UtilityPlant Utility Plant (101-106, 114) |
200 |
|
|
3 |
ConstructionWorkInProgress Construction Work in Progress (107) |
200 |
|
|
4 |
UtilityPlantAndConstructionWorkInProgress TOTAL Utility Plant (Enter Total of lines 2 and 3) |
|
|
|
5 |
AccumulatedProvisionForDepreciationAmortizationAndDepletionOfPlantUtility (Less) Accum. Prov. for Depr. Amort. Depl. (108, 110, 111, 115) |
200 |
|
|
6 |
UtilityPlantNet Net Utility Plant (Enter Total of line 4 less 5) |
|
|
|
7 |
NuclearFuelInProcessOfRefinementConversionEnrichmentAndFabrication Nuclear Fuel in Process of Ref., Conv., Enrich., and Fab. (120.1) |
202 |
|
|
8 |
NuclearFuelMaterialsAndAssembliesStockAccountMajorOnly Nuclear Fuel Materials and Assemblies-Stock Account (120.2) |
|
||
9 |
NuclearFuelAssembliesInReactorMajorOnly Nuclear Fuel Assemblies in Reactor (120.3) |
|
|
|
10 |
SpentNuclearFuelMajorOnly Spent Nuclear Fuel (120.4) |
|||
11 |
NuclearFuelUnderCapitalLeases Nuclear Fuel Under Capital Leases (120.6) |
|||
12 |
AccumulatedProvisionForAmortizationOfNuclearFuelAssemblies (Less) Accum. Prov. for Amort. of Nucl. Fuel Assemblies (120.5) |
202 |
|
|
13 |
NuclearFuelNet Net Nuclear Fuel (Enter Total of lines 7-11 less 12) |
|
|
|
14 |
UtilityPlantAndNuclearFuelNet Net Utility Plant (Enter Total of lines 6 and 13) |
|
|
|
15 |
OtherElectricPlantAdjustments Utility Plant Adjustments (116) |
|||
16 |
GasStoredUndergroundNoncurrent Gas Stored Underground - Noncurrent (117) |
|||
17 |
OtherPropertyAndInvestmentsAbstract OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS |
|||
18 |
NonutilityProperty Nonutility Property (121) |
|
|
|
19 |
AccumulatedProvisionForDepreciationAndAmortizationOfNonutilityProperty (Less) Accum. Prov. for Depr. and Amort. (122) |
|
|
|
20 |
InvestmentInAssociatedCompanies Investments in Associated Companies (123) |
|||
21 |
InvestmentInSubsidiaryCompanies Investment in Subsidiary Companies (123.1) |
224 |
||
23 |
NoncurrentPortionOfAllowances Noncurrent Portion of Allowances |
228 |
||
24 |
OtherInvestments Other Investments (124) |
|||
25 |
SinkingFunds Sinking Funds (125) |
|||
26 |
DepreciationFund Depreciation Fund (126) |
|||
27 |
AmortizationFundFederal Amortization Fund - Federal (127) |
|||
28 |
OtherSpecialFunds Other Special Funds (128) |
|
|
|
29 |
SpecialFunds Special Funds (Non Major Only) (129) |
|||
30 |
DerivativeInstrumentAssetsLongTerm Long-Term Portion of Derivative Assets (175) |
|
|
|
31 |
DerivativeInstrumentAssetsHedgesLongTerm Long-Term Portion of Derivative Assets - Hedges (176) |
|||
32 |
OtherPropertyAndInvestments TOTAL Other Property and Investments (Lines 18-21 and 23-31) |
|
|
|
33 |
CurrentAndAccruedAssetsAbstract CURRENT AND ACCRUED ASSETS |
|||
34 |
CashAndWorkingFunds Cash and Working Funds (Non-major Only) (130) |
|||
35 |
Cash Cash (131) |
|
|
|
36 |
SpecialDeposits Special Deposits (132-134) |
|||
37 |
WorkingFunds Working Fund (135) |
|
|
|
38 |
TemporaryCashInvestments Temporary Cash Investments (136) |
|
|
|
39 |
NotesReceivable Notes Receivable (141) |
|||
40 |
CustomerAccountsReceivable Customer Accounts Receivable (142) |
|
|
|
41 |
OtherAccountsReceivable Other Accounts Receivable (143) |
|
|
|
42 |
AccumulatedProvisionForUncollectibleAccountsCredit (Less) Accum. Prov. for Uncollectible Acct.-Credit (144) |
|
|
|
43 |
NotesReceivableFromAssociatedCompanies Notes Receivable from Associated Companies (145) |
|||
44 |
AccountsReceivableFromAssociatedCompanies Accounts Receivable from Assoc. Companies (146) |
|
|
|
45 |
FuelStock Fuel Stock (151) |
227 |
|
|
46 |
FuelStockExpensesUndistributed Fuel Stock Expenses Undistributed (152) |
227 |
||
47 |
Residuals Residuals (Elec) and Extracted Products (153) |
227 |
||
48 |
PlantMaterialsAndOperatingSupplies Plant Materials and Operating Supplies (154) |
227 |
|
|
49 |
Merchandise Merchandise (155) |
227 |
||
50 |
OtherMaterialsAndSupplies Other Materials and Supplies (156) |
227 |
||
51 |
NuclearMaterialsHeldForSale Nuclear Materials Held for Sale (157) |
202/227 |
||
52 |
AllowanceInventoryAndWithheld Allowances (158.1 and 158.2) |
228 |
|
|
53 |
NoncurrentPortionOfAllowances (Less) Noncurrent Portion of Allowances |
228 |
||
54 |
StoresExpenseUndistributed Stores Expense Undistributed (163) |
227 |
|
|
55 |
GasStoredCurrent Gas Stored Underground - Current (164.1) |
|||
56 |
LiquefiedNaturalGasStoredAndHeldForProcessing Liquefied Natural Gas Stored and Held for Processing (164.2-164.3) |
|||
57 |
Prepayments Prepayments (165) |
|
|
|
58 |
AdvancesForGas Advances for Gas (166-167) |
|||
59 |
InterestAndDividendsReceivable Interest and Dividends Receivable (171) |
|||
60 |
RentsReceivable Rents Receivable (172) |
|||
61 |
AccruedUtilityRevenues Accrued Utility Revenues (173) |
|
|
|
62 |
MiscellaneousCurrentAndAccruedAssets Miscellaneous Current and Accrued Assets (174) |
|
|
|
63 |
DerivativeInstrumentAssets Derivative Instrument Assets (175) |
|
|
|
64 |
DerivativeInstrumentAssetsLongTerm (Less) Long-Term Portion of Derivative Instrument Assets (175) |
|
|
|
65 |
DerivativeInstrumentAssetsHedges Derivative Instrument Assets - Hedges (176) |
|||
66 |
DerivativeInstrumentAssetsHedgesLongTerm (Less) Long-Term Portion of Derivative Instrument Assets - Hedges (176) |
|||
67 |
CurrentAndAccruedAssets Total Current and Accrued Assets (Lines 34 through 66) |
|
|
|
68 |
DeferredDebitsAbstract DEFERRED DEBITS |
|||
69 |
UnamortizedDebtExpense Unamortized Debt Expenses (181) |
|
|
|
70 |
ExtraordinaryPropertyLosses Extraordinary Property Losses (182.1) |
230a |
||
71 |
UnrecoveredPlantAndRegulatoryStudyCosts Unrecovered Plant and Regulatory Study Costs (182.2) |
230b |
||
72 |
OtherRegulatoryAssets Other Regulatory Assets (182.3) |
232 |
|
|
73 |
PreliminarySurveyAndInvestigationCharges Prelim. Survey and Investigation Charges (Electric) (183) |
|
|
|
74 |
PreliminaryNaturalGasSurveyAndInvestigationChargesAndOtherPreliminarySurveyAndInvestigationCharges Preliminary Natural Gas Survey and Investigation Charges 183.1) |
|||
75 |
OtherPreliminarySurveyAndInvestigationCharges Other Preliminary Survey and Investigation Charges (183.2) |
|||
76 |
ClearingAccounts Clearing Accounts (184) |
|
|
|
77 |
TemporaryFacilities Temporary Facilities (185) |
|||
78 |
MiscellaneousDeferredDebits Miscellaneous Deferred Debits (186) |
233 |
|
|
79 |
DeferredLossesFromDispositionOfUtilityPlant Def. Losses from Disposition of Utility Plt. (187) |
|||
80 |
ResearchDevelopmentAndDemonstrationExpenditures Research, Devel. and Demonstration Expend. (188) |
352 |
||
81 |
UnamortizedLossOnReacquiredDebt Unamortized Loss on Reaquired Debt (189) |
|
|
|
82 |
AccumulatedDeferredIncomeTaxes Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes (190) |
234 |
|
|
83 |
UnrecoveredPurchasedGasCosts Unrecovered Purchased Gas Costs (191) |
|||
84 |
DeferredDebits Total Deferred Debits (lines 69 through 83) |
|
|
|
85 |
AssetsAndOtherDebits TOTAL ASSETS (lines 14-16, 32, 67, and 84) |
|
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET (LIABILITIES AND OTHER CREDITS) |
||||
Line No. |
Title of Account (a) |
Ref. Page No. (b) |
Current Year End of Quarter/Year Balance (c) |
Prior Year End Balance 12/31 (d) |
1 |
ProprietaryCapitalAbstract PROPRIETARY CAPITAL |
|||
2 |
CommonStockIssued Common Stock Issued (201) |
250 |
|
|
3 |
PreferredStockIssued Preferred Stock Issued (204) |
250 |
||
4 |
CapitalStockSubscribed Capital Stock Subscribed (202, 205) |
|||
5 |
StockLiabilityForConversion Stock Liability for Conversion (203, 206) |
|||
6 |
PremiumOnCapitalStock Premium on Capital Stock (207) |
|
|
|
7 |
OtherPaidInCapital Other Paid-In Capital (208-211) |
253 |
|
|
8 |
InstallmentsReceivedOnCapitalStock Installments Received on Capital Stock (212) |
252 |
||
9 |
DiscountOnCapitalStock (Less) Discount on Capital Stock (213) |
254 |
||
10 |
CapitalStockExpense (Less) Capital Stock Expense (214) |
254b |
|
|
11 |
RetainedEarnings Retained Earnings (215, 215.1, 216) |
118 |
|
|
12 |
UnappropriatedUndistributedSubsidiaryEarnings Unappropriated Undistributed Subsidiary Earnings (216.1) |
118 |
||
13 |
ReacquiredCapitalStock (Less) Reacquired Capital Stock (217) |
250 |
||
14 |
NoncorporateProprietorship Noncorporate Proprietorship (Non-major only) (218) |
|||
15 |
AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (219) |
122(a)(b) |
|
|
16 |
ProprietaryCapital Total Proprietary Capital (lines 2 through 15) |
|
|
|
17 |
LongTermDebtAbstract LONG-TERM DEBT |
|||
18 |
Bonds Bonds (221) |
256 |
|
|
19 |
ReacquiredBonds (Less) Reacquired Bonds (222) |
256 |
||
20 |
AdvancesFromAssociatedCompanies Advances from Associated Companies (223) |
256 |
||
21 |
OtherLongTermDebt Other Long-Term Debt (224) |
256 |
|
|
22 |
UnamortizedPremiumOnLongTermDebt Unamortized Premium on Long-Term Debt (225) |
|
|
|
23 |
UnamortizedDiscountOnLongTermDebtDebit (Less) Unamortized Discount on Long-Term Debt-Debit (226) |
|
|
|
24 |
LongTermDebt Total Long-Term Debt (lines 18 through 23) |
|
|
|
25 |
OtherNoncurrentLiabilitiesAbstract OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES |
|||
26 |
ObligationsUnderCapitalLeaseNoncurrent Obligations Under Capital Leases - Noncurrent (227) |
|
|
|
27 |
AccumulatedProvisionForPropertyInsurance Accumulated Provision for Property Insurance (228.1) |
|||
28 |
AccumulatedProvisionForInjuriesAndDamages Accumulated Provision for Injuries and Damages (228.2) |
|
|
|
29 |
AccumulatedProvisionForPensionsAndBenefits Accumulated Provision for Pensions and Benefits (228.3) |
|
|
|
30 |
AccumulatedMiscellaneousOperatingProvisions Accumulated Miscellaneous Operating Provisions (228.4) |
|||
31 |
AccumulatedProvisionForRateRefunds Accumulated Provision for Rate Refunds (229) |
|||
32 |
LongTermPortionOfDerivativeInstrumentLiabilities Long-Term Portion of Derivative Instrument Liabilities |
|
|
|
33 |
LongTermPortionOfDerivativeInstrumentLiabilitiesHedges Long-Term Portion of Derivative Instrument Liabilities - Hedges |
|||
34 |
AssetRetirementObligations Asset Retirement Obligations (230) |
|
|
|
35 |
OtherNoncurrentLiabilities Total Other Noncurrent Liabilities (lines 26 through 34) |
|
|
|
36 |
CurrentAndAccruedLiabilitiesAbstract CURRENT AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES |
|||
37 |
NotesPayable Notes Payable (231) |
|
|
|
38 |
AccountsPayable Accounts Payable (232) |
|
|
|
39 |
NotesPayableToAssociatedCompanies Notes Payable to Associated Companies (233) |
|||
40 |
AccountsPayableToAssociatedCompanies Accounts Payable to Associated Companies (234) |
|
|
|
41 |
CustomerDeposits Customer Deposits (235) |
|
|
|
42 |
TaxesAccrued Taxes Accrued (236) |
262 |
|
|
43 |
InterestAccrued Interest Accrued (237) |
|
|
|
44 |
DividendsDeclared Dividends Declared (238) |
|||
45 |
MaturedLongTermDebt Matured Long-Term Debt (239) |
|||
46 |
MaturedInterest Matured Interest (240) |
|||
47 |
TaxCollectionsPayable Tax Collections Payable (241) |
|
|
|
48 |
MiscellaneousCurrentAndAccruedLiabilities Miscellaneous Current and Accrued Liabilities (242) |
|
|
|
49 |
ObligationsUnderCapitalLeasesCurrent Obligations Under Capital Leases-Current (243) |
|
|
|
50 |
DerivativesInstrumentLiabilities Derivative Instrument Liabilities (244) |
|
|
|
51 |
LongTermPortionOfDerivativeInstrumentLiabilities (Less) Long-Term Portion of Derivative Instrument Liabilities |
|
|
|
52 |
DerivativeInstrumentLiabilitiesHedges Derivative Instrument Liabilities - Hedges (245) |
|||
53 |
LongTermPortionOfDerivativeInstrumentLiabilitiesHedges (Less) Long-Term Portion of Derivative Instrument Liabilities-Hedges |
|||
54 |
CurrentAndAccruedLiabilities Total Current and Accrued Liabilities (lines 37 through 53) |
|
|
|
55 |
DeferredCreditsAbstract DEFERRED CREDITS |
|||
56 |
CustomerAdvancesForConstruction Customer Advances for Construction (252) |
|
|
|
57 |
AccumulatedDeferredInvestmentTaxCredits Accumulated Deferred Investment Tax Credits (255) |
266 |
|
|
58 |
DeferredGainsFromDispositionOfUtilityPlant Deferred Gains from Disposition of Utility Plant (256) |
|||
59 |
OtherDeferredCredits Other Deferred Credits (253) |
269 |
|
|
60 |
OtherRegulatoryLiabilities Other Regulatory Liabilities (254) |
278 |
|
|
61 |
UnamortizedGainOnReacquiredDebt Unamortized Gain on Reacquired Debt (257) |
|
|
|
62 |
AccumulatedDeferredIncomeTaxesAcceleratedAmortizationProperty Accum. Deferred Income Taxes-Accel. Amort.(281) |
272 |
||
63 |
AccumulatedDeferredIncomeTaxesOtherProperty Accum. Deferred Income Taxes-Other Property (282) |
|
|
|
64 |
AccumulatedDeferredIncomeTaxesOther Accum. Deferred Income Taxes-Other (283) |
|
|
|
65 |
DeferredCredits Total Deferred Credits (lines 56 through 64) |
|
|
|
66 |
LiabilitiesAndOtherCredits TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER EQUITY (lines 16, 24, 35, 54 and 65) |
|
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
STATEMENT OF INCOME |
|||||||||||||
Quarterly
Annual or Quarterly if applicable
|
|||||||||||||
Line No. |
Title of Account (a) |
(Ref.) Page No. (b) |
Total Current Year to Date Balance for Quarter/Year (c) |
Total Prior Year to Date Balance for Quarter/Year (d) |
Current 3 Months Ended - Quarterly Only - No 4th Quarter (e) |
Prior 3 Months Ended - Quarterly Only - No 4th Quarter (f) |
Electric Utility Current Year to Date (in dollars) (g) |
Electric Utility Previous Year to Date (in dollars) (h) |
Gas Utiity Current Year to Date (in dollars) (i) |
Gas Utility Previous Year to Date (in dollars) (j) |
Other Utility Current Year to Date (in dollars) (k) |
Other Utility Previous Year to Date (in dollars) (l) |
|
1 |
UtilityOperatingIncomeAbstract UTILITY OPERATING INCOME |
||||||||||||
2 |
OperatingRevenues Operating Revenues (400) |
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
3 |
OperatingExpensesAbstract Operating Expenses |
||||||||||||
4 |
OperationExpense Operation Expenses (401) |
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
5 |
MaintenanceExpense Maintenance Expenses (402) |
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
6 |
DepreciationExpense Depreciation Expense (403) |
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
7 |
DepreciationExpenseForAssetRetirementCosts Depreciation Expense for Asset Retirement Costs (403.1) |
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
8 |
AmortizationAndDepletionOfUtilityPlant Amort. & Depl. of Utility Plant (404-405) |
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
9 |
AmortizationOfElectricPlantAcquisitionAdjustments Amort. of Utility Plant Acq. Adj. (406) |
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
10 |
AmortizationOfPropertyLossesUnrecoveredPlantAndRegulatoryStudyCosts Amort. Property Losses, Unrecov Plant and Regulatory Study Costs (407) |
||||||||||||
11 |
AmortizationOfConversionExpenses Amort. of Conversion Expenses (407.2) |
||||||||||||
12 |
RegulatoryDebits Regulatory Debits (407.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
13 |
RegulatoryCredits (Less) Regulatory Credits (407.4) |
|
|
|
|||||||||
14 |
TaxesOtherThanIncomeTaxesUtilityOperatingIncome Taxes Other Than Income Taxes (408.1) |
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
15 |
IncomeTaxesOperatingIncome Income Taxes - Federal (409.1) |
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
16 |
IncomeTaxesUtilityOperatingIncomeOther Income Taxes - Other (409.1) |
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
17 |
ProvisionsForDeferredIncomeTaxesUtilityOperatingIncome Provision for Deferred Income Taxes (410.1) |
234, 272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
18 |
ProvisionForDeferredIncomeTaxesCreditOperatingIncome (Less) Provision for Deferred Income Taxes-Cr. (411.1) |
234, 272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
19 |
InvestmentTaxCreditAdjustments Investment Tax Credit Adj. - Net (411.4) |
266 |
|||||||||||
20 |
GainsFromDispositionOfPlant (Less) Gains from Disp. of Utility Plant (411.6) |
||||||||||||
21 |
LossesFromDispositionOfServiceCompanyPlant Losses from Disp. of Utility Plant (411.7) |
||||||||||||
22 |
GainsFromDispositionOfAllowances (Less) Gains from Disposition of Allowances (411.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
23 |
LossesFromDispositionOfAllowances Losses from Disposition of Allowances (411.9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
24 |
AccretionExpense Accretion Expense (411.10) |
||||||||||||
25 |
UtilityOperatingExpenses TOTAL Utility Operating Expenses (Enter Total of lines 4 thru 24) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
27 |
NetUtilityOperatingIncome Net Util Oper Inc (Enter Tot line 2 less 25) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
28 |
OtherIncomeAndDeductionsAbstract Other Income and Deductions |
||||||||||||
29 |
OtherIncomeAbstract Other Income |
||||||||||||
30 |
NonutilityOperatingIncomeAbstract Nonutilty Operating Income |
||||||||||||
31 |
RevenuesFromMerchandisingJobbingAndContractWork Revenues From Merchandising, Jobbing and Contract Work (415) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
32 |
CostsAndExpensesOfMerchandisingJobbingAndContractWork (Less) Costs and Exp. of Merchandising, Job. & Contract Work (416) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
33 |
RevenuesFromNonutilityOperations Revenues From Nonutility Operations (417) |
||||||||||||
34 |
ExpensesOfNonutilityOperations (Less) Expenses of Nonutility Operations (417.1) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
35 |
NonoperatingRentalIncome Nonoperating Rental Income (418) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
36 |
EquityInEarningsOfSubsidiaryCompanies Equity in Earnings of Subsidiary Companies (418.1) |
119 |
|||||||||||
37 |
InterestAndDividendIncome Interest and Dividend Income (419) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
38 |
AllowanceForOtherFundsUsedDuringConstruction Allowance for Other Funds Used During Construction (419.1) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
39 |
MiscellaneousNonoperatingIncome Miscellaneous Nonoperating Income (421) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
40 |
GainOnDispositionOfProperty Gain on Disposition of Property (421.1) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
41 |
OtherIncome TOTAL Other Income (Enter Total of lines 31 thru 40) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
42 |
OtherIncomeDeductionsAbstract Other Income Deductions |
||||||||||||
43 |
LossOnDispositionOfProperty Loss on Disposition of Property (421.2) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
44 |
MiscellaneousAmortization Miscellaneous Amortization (425) |
||||||||||||
45 |
Donations Donations (426.1) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
46 |
LifeInsurance Life Insurance (426.2) |
||||||||||||
47 |
Penalties Penalties (426.3) |
|
|
||||||||||
48 |
ExpendituresForCertainCivicPoliticalAndRelatedActivities Exp. for Certain Civic, Political & Related Activities (426.4) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
49 |
OtherDeductions Other Deductions (426.5) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
50 |
OtherIncomeDeductions TOTAL Other Income Deductions (Total of lines 43 thru 49) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
51 |
TaxesApplicableToOtherIncomeAndDeductionsAbstract Taxes Applic. to Other Income and Deductions |
||||||||||||
52 |
TaxesOtherThanIncomeTaxesOtherIncomeAndDeductions Taxes Other Than Income Taxes (408.2) |
262 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
53 |
IncomeTaxesFederal Income Taxes-Federal (409.2) |
262 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
54 |
IncomeTaxesOther Income Taxes-Other (409.2) |
262 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
55 |
ProvisionForDeferredIncomeTaxesOtherIncomeAndDeductions Provision for Deferred Inc. Taxes (410.2) |
234, 272 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
56 |
ProvisionForDeferredIncomeTaxesCreditOtherIncomeAndDeductions (Less) Provision for Deferred Income Taxes-Cr. (411.2) |
234, 272 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
57 |
InvestmentTaxCreditAdjustmentsNonutilityOperations Investment Tax Credit Adj.-Net (411.5) |
||||||||||||
58 |
InvestmentTaxCredits (Less) Investment Tax Credits (420) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
59 |
TaxesOnOtherIncomeAndDeductions TOTAL Taxes on Other Income and Deductions (Total of lines 52-58) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
60 |
NetOtherIncomeAndDeductions Net Other Income and Deductions (Total of lines 41, 50, 59) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
61 |
InterestChargesAbstract Interest Charges |
||||||||||||
62 |
InterestOnLongTermDebt Interest on Long-Term Debt (427) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
63 |
AmortizationOfDebtDiscountAndExpense Amort. of Debt Disc. and Expense (428) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
64 |
AmortizationOfLossOnReacquiredDebt Amortization of Loss on Reaquired Debt (428.1) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
65 |
AmortizationOfPremiumOnDebtCredit (Less) Amort. of Premium on Debt-Credit (429) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
66 |
AmortizationOfGainOnReacquiredDebtCredit (Less) Amortization of Gain on Reaquired Debt-Credit (429.1) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
67 |
InterestOnDebtToAssociatedCompanies Interest on Debt to Assoc. Companies (430) |
||||||||||||
68 |
OtherInterestExpense Other Interest Expense (431) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
69 |
AllowanceForBorrowedFundsUsedDuringConstructionCredit (Less) Allowance for Borrowed Funds Used During Construction-Cr. (432) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
70 |
NetInterestCharges Net Interest Charges (Total of lines 62 thru 69) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
71 |
IncomeBeforeExtraordinaryItems Income Before Extraordinary Items (Total of lines 27, 60 and 70) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
72 |
ExtraordinaryItemsAbstract Extraordinary Items |
||||||||||||
73 |
ExtraordinaryIncome Extraordinary Income (434) |
||||||||||||
74 |
ExtraordinaryDeductions (Less) Extraordinary Deductions (435) |
||||||||||||
75 |
NetExtraordinaryItems Net Extraordinary Items (Total of line 73 less line 74) |
||||||||||||
76 |
IncomeTaxesExtraordinaryItems Income Taxes-Federal and Other (409.3) |
262 |
|||||||||||
77 |
ExtraordinaryItemsAfterTaxes Extraordinary Items After Taxes (line 75 less line 76) |
||||||||||||
78 |
NetIncomeLoss Net Income (Total of line 71 and 77) |
|
|
|
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
STATEMENT OF RETAINED EARNINGS |
||||
|
||||
Line No. |
Item (a) |
Contra Primary Account Affected (b) |
Current Quarter/Year Year to Date Balance (c) |
Previous Quarter/Year Year to Date Balance (d) |
UnappropriatedRetainedEarningsAbstract UNAPPROPRIATED RETAINED EARNINGS (Account 216) |
||||
1 |
UnappropriatedRetainedEarnings Balance-Beginning of Period |
|
|
|
2 |
ChangesAbstract Changes |
|||
3 |
AdjustmentsToRetainedEarningsAbstract Adjustments to Retained Earnings (Account 439) |
|||
4 |
AdjustmentsToRetainedEarningsCreditAbstract Adjustments to Retained Earnings Credit |
|||
9 |
AdjustmentsToRetainedEarningsCredit TOTAL Credits to Retained Earnings (Acct. 439) |
|||
10 |
AdjustmentsToRetainedEarningsDebitAbstract Adjustments to Retained Earnings Debit |
|||
15 |
AdjustmentsToRetainedEarningsDebit TOTAL Debits to Retained Earnings (Acct. 439) |
|||
16 |
BalanceTransferredFromIncome Balance Transferred from Income (Account 433 less Account 418.1) |
|
|
|
17 |
AppropriationsOfRetainedEarningsAbstract Appropriations of Retained Earnings (Acct. 436) |
|||
22 |
AppropriationsOfRetainedEarnings TOTAL Appropriations of Retained Earnings (Acct. 436) |
|||
23 |
DividendsDeclaredPreferredStockAbstract Dividends Declared-Preferred Stock (Account 437) |
|||
29 |
DividendsDeclaredPreferredStock TOTAL Dividends Declared-Preferred Stock (Acct. 437) |
|||
30 |
DividendsDeclaredCommonStockAbstract Dividends Declared-Common Stock (Account 438) |
|||
30.1 |
DividendsDeclaredCommonStock |
|
|
|
36 |
DividendsDeclaredCommonStock TOTAL Dividends Declared-Common Stock (Acct. 438) |
|
|
|
37 |
TransfersFromUnappropriatedUndistributedSubsidiaryEarnings Transfers from Acct 216.1, Unapprop. Undistrib. Subsidiary Earnings |
|||
38 |
UnappropriatedRetainedEarnings Balance - End of Period (Total 1,9,15,16,22,29,36,37) |
|
|
|
39 |
AppropriatedRetainedEarningsAbstract APPROPRIATED RETAINED EARNINGS (Account 215) |
|||
45 |
AppropriatedRetainedEarnings TOTAL Appropriated Retained Earnings (Account 215) |
|||
AppropriatedRetainedEarningsAmortizationReserveFederalAbstract APPROP. RETAINED EARNINGS - AMORT. Reserve, Federal (Account 215.1) |
||||
46 |
AppropriatedRetainedEarningsAmortizationReserveFederal TOTAL Approp. Retained Earnings-Amort. Reserve, Federal (Acct. 215.1) |
|||
47 |
AppropriatedRetainedEarningsIncludingReserveAmortization TOTAL Approp. Retained Earnings (Acct. 215, 215.1) (Total 45,46) |
|||
48 |
RetainedEarnings TOTAL Retained Earnings (Acct. 215, 215.1, 216) (Total 38, 47) (216.1) |
|
|
|
UnappropriatedUndistributedSubsidiaryEarningsAbstract UNAPPROPRIATED UNDISTRIBUTED SUBSIDIARY EARNINGS (Account Report only on an Annual Basis, no Quarterly) |
||||
49 |
UnappropriatedUndistributedSubsidiaryEarnings Balance-Beginning of Year (Debit or Credit) |
|||
50 |
EquityInEarningsOfSubsidiaryCompanies Equity in Earnings for Year (Credit) (Account 418.1) |
|||
51 |
DividendsReceived (Less) Dividends Received (Debit) |
|||
52 |
ChangesUnappropriatedUndistributedSubsidiaryEarningsCredits TOTAL other Changes in unappropriated undistributed subsidiary earnings for the year |
|||
53 |
UnappropriatedUndistributedSubsidiaryEarnings Balance-End of Year (Total lines 49 thru 52) |
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Line No. |
Description (See Instructions No.1 for explanation of codes) (a) |
Current Year to Date Quarter/Year (b) |
Previous Year to Date Quarter/Year (c) |
|||||||||
1 |
NetCashFlowFromOperatingActivitiesAbstract Net Cash Flow from Operating Activities |
|||||||||||
2 |
NetIncomeLoss Net Income (Line 78(c) on page 117) |
|
|
|||||||||
3 |
NoncashChargesCreditsToIncomeAbstract Noncash Charges (Credits) to Income: |
|||||||||||
4 |
DepreciationAndDepletion Depreciation and Depletion |
|
|
|||||||||
5 |
NoncashAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivities Amortization of (Specify) (footnote details) |
|||||||||||
5.1 |
NoncashAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
5.2 |
NoncashAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
8 |
DeferredIncomeTaxesNet Deferred Income Taxes (Net) |
|
|
|||||||||
9 |
InvestmentTaxCreditAdjustmentsNet Investment Tax Credit Adjustment (Net) |
|
|
|||||||||
10 |
NetIncreaseDecreaseInReceivablesOperatingActivities Net (Increase) Decrease in Receivables |
|
|
|||||||||
11 |
NetIncreaseDecreaseInInventoryOperatingActivities Net (Increase) Decrease in Inventory |
|
|
|||||||||
12 |
NetIncreaseDecreaseInAllowancesInventoryOperatingActivities Net (Increase) Decrease in Allowances Inventory |
|
|
|||||||||
13 |
NetIncreaseDecreaseInPayablesAndAccruedExpensesOperatingActivities Net Increase (Decrease) in Payables and Accrued Expenses |
|
|
|||||||||
14 |
NetIncreaseDecreaseInOtherRegulatoryAssetsOperatingActivities Net (Increase) Decrease in Other Regulatory Assets |
|
|
|||||||||
15 |
NetIncreaseDecreaseInOtherRegulatoryLiabilitiesOperatingActivities Net Increase (Decrease) in Other Regulatory Liabilities |
|
|
|||||||||
16 |
AllowanceForOtherFundsUsedDuringConstructionOperatingActivities (Less) Allowance for Other Funds Used During Construction |
|
|
|||||||||
17 |
UndistributedEarningsFromSubsidiaryCompaniesOperatingActivities (Less) Undistributed Earnings from Subsidiary Companies |
|||||||||||
18 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivities Other (provide details in footnote): |
|||||||||||
18.1 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.2 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.3 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
||||||||||
18.4 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.5 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.6 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.7 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
||||||||||
18.8 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.9 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.10 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.11 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.12 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.13 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.14 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.15 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
||||||||||
18.16 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.17 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.18 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|||||||||||
18.19 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.20 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.21 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.22 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.23 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.24 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.25 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.26 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.27 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.28 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.29 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.30 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.31 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.32 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.33 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.34 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.35 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.36 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
||||||||||
18.37 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
18.38 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromOperatingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
22 |
NetCashFlowFromOperatingActivities Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities (Total of Lines 2 thru 21) |
|
|
|||||||||
24 |
CashFlowsFromInvestmentActivitiesAbstract Cash Flows from Investment Activities: |
|||||||||||
25 |
ConstructionAndAcquisitionOfPlantIncludingLandAbstract Construction and Acquisition of Plant (including land): |
|||||||||||
26 |
GrossAdditionsToUtilityPlantLessNuclearFuelInvestingActivities Gross Additions to Utility Plant (less nuclear fuel) |
|
|
|||||||||
27 |
GrossAdditionsToNuclearFuelInvestingActivities Gross Additions to Nuclear Fuel |
|
|
|||||||||
28 |
GrossAdditionsToCommonUtilityPlantInvestingActivities Gross Additions to Common Utility Plant |
|||||||||||
29 |
GrossAdditionsToNonutilityPlantInvestingActivities Gross Additions to Nonutility Plant |
|||||||||||
30 |
AllowanceForOtherFundsUsedDuringConstructionInvestingActivities (Less) Allowance for Other Funds Used During Construction |
|
|
|||||||||
31 |
OtherConstructionAndAcquisitionOfPlantInvestmentActivities Other (provide details in footnote): |
|||||||||||
31.1 |
OtherConstructionAndAcquisitionOfPlantInvestmentActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
34 |
CashOutflowsForPlant Cash Outflows for Plant (Total of lines 26 thru 33) |
|
|
|||||||||
36 |
AcquisitionOfOtherNoncurrentAssets Acquisition of Other Noncurrent Assets (d) |
|||||||||||
37 |
ProceedsFromDisposalOfNoncurrentAssets Proceeds from Disposal of Noncurrent Assets (d) |
|||||||||||
39 |
InvestmentsInAndAdvancesToAssociatedAndSubsidiaryCompanies Investments in and Advances to Assoc. and Subsidiary Companies |
|||||||||||
40 |
ContributionsAndAdvancesFromAssociatedAndSubsidiaryCompanies Contributions and Advances from Assoc. and Subsidiary Companies |
|||||||||||
41 |
DispositionOfInvestmentsInAndAdvancesToAssociatedAndSubsidiaryCompaniesAbstract Disposition of Investments in (and Advances to) |
|||||||||||
42 |
DispositionOfInvestmentsInAndAdvancesToAssociatedAndSubsidiaryCompanies Disposition of Investments in (and Advances to) Associated and Subsidiary Companies |
|||||||||||
44 |
PurchaseOfInvestmentSecurities Purchase of Investment Securities (a) |
|||||||||||
45 |
ProceedsFromSalesOfInvestmentSecurities Proceeds from Sales of Investment Securities (a) |
|||||||||||
46 |
LoansMadeOrPurchased Loans Made or Purchased |
|||||||||||
47 |
CollectionsOnLoans Collections on Loans |
|||||||||||
49 |
NetIncreaseDecreaseInReceivablesInvestingActivities Net (Increase) Decrease in Receivables |
|
|
|||||||||
50 |
NetIncreaseDecreaseInInventoryInvestingActivities Net (Increase) Decrease in Inventory |
|||||||||||
51 |
NetIncreaseDecreaseInAllowancesHeldForSpeculationInvestingActivities Net (Increase) Decrease in Allowances Held for Speculation |
|||||||||||
52 |
NetIncreaseDecreaseInPayablesAndAccruedExpensesInvestingActivities Net Increase (Decrease) in Payables and Accrued Expenses |
|
|
|||||||||
53 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromInvestmentActivities Other (provide details in footnote): |
|||||||||||
53.1 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromInvestmentActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
53.2 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromInvestmentActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
53.3 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromInvestmentActivitiesDescription |
|||||||||||
53.4 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromInvestmentActivitiesDescription |
|||||||||||
53.5 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromInvestmentActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
53.6 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromInvestmentActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
53.7 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromInvestmentActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
57 |
CashFlowsProvidedFromUsedInInvestmentActivities Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities (Total of lines 34 thru 55) |
|
|
|||||||||
59 |
CashFlowsFromFinancingActivitiesAbstract Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|||||||||||
60 |
ProceedsFromIssuanceAbstract Proceeds from Issuance of: |
|||||||||||
61 |
ProceedsFromIssuanceOfLongTermDebtFinancingActivities Long-Term Debt (b) |
|
||||||||||
62 |
ProceedsFromIssuanceOfPreferredStockFinancingActivities Preferred Stock |
|||||||||||
63 |
ProceedsFromIssuanceOfCommonStockFinancingActivities Common Stock |
|||||||||||
64 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromFinancingActivities Other (provide details in footnote): |
|||||||||||
64.1 |
OtherAdjustmentsToCashFlowsFromFinancingActivitiesDescription |
|
|
|||||||||
66 |
NetIncreaseInShortTermDebt Net Increase in Short-Term Debt (c) |
|
||||||||||
67 |
OtherAdjustmentsByOutsideSourcesToCashFlowsFromFinancingActivities Other (provide details in footnote): |
|||||||||||
67.1 |
DescriptionForOtherAdjustmentsByOutsideSourcesToCashFlowsFromFinancingActivities |
|||||||||||
67.2 |
DescriptionForOtherAdjustmentsByOutsideSourcesToCashFlowsFromFinancingActivities |
|||||||||||
70 |
CashProvidedByOutsideSources Cash Provided by Outside Sources (Total 61 thru 69) |
|
|
|||||||||
72 |
PaymentsForRetirementAbstract Payments for Retirement of: |
|||||||||||
73 |
PaymentsForRetirementOfLongTermDebtFinancingActivities Long-term Debt (b) |
|||||||||||
74 |
PaymentsForRetirementOfPreferredStockFinancingActivities Preferred Stock |
|||||||||||
75 |
PaymentsForRetirementOfCommonStockFinancingActivities Common Stock |
|||||||||||
76 |
OtherRetirementsOfBalancesImpactingCashFlowsFromFinancingActivities Other (provide details in footnote): |
|||||||||||
78 |
NetDecreaseInShortTermDebt Net Decrease in Short-Term Debt (c) |
|
||||||||||
80 |
DividendsOnPreferredStock Dividends on Preferred Stock |
|||||||||||
81 |
DividendsOnCommonStock Dividends on Common Stock |
|
|
|||||||||
83 |
CashFlowsProvidedFromUsedInFinancingActivities Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities (Total of lines 70 thru 81) |
|
|
|||||||||
85 |
NetIncreaseDecreaseInCashAndCashEquivalentsAbstract Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|||||||||||
86 |
NetIncreaseDecreaseInCashAndCashEquivalents Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents (Total of line 22, 57 and 83) |
|
|
|||||||||
88 |
CashAndCashEquivalents Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
|||||||||
90 |
CashAndCashEquivalents Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying financial statements were prepared in accordance with the accounting requirements of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) as set forth in its applicable Uniform System of Accounts and published accounting releases, which is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The primary differences in the accompanying FERC financial statements as compared to GAAP include presenting certain decommissioning and reclamation activities, deferred tax assets and liabilities, regulatory assets and liabilities and risk management assets and liabilities on a gross versus net basis; presenting cost of removal liabilities in accumulated provision for depreciation; presenting tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions as deferred income tax liabilities; presenting intangible assets in net utility plant; deconsolidating certain Variable Interest Entities (“VIE”) and presenting debt issuance costs in deferred debits rather than as a reduction of long-term debt. Additionally, the accompanying FERC financial statements do not separately present the current portion of such items as long-term debt, Asset Retirement Obligations (“ARO”) and regulatory assets and liabilities as required by GAAP. Arizona Public Service’s (“APS”) notes to financial statements have been combined with Pinnacle West Capital Corporation’s financial statements and are prepared in accordance with GAAP; accordingly, certain footnotes are not reflective of APS’s financial statements contained herein.
Accounting Records and Use of Estimates Our accounting records are maintained in accordance with accounting principles GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Our unaudited financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments except as otherwise disclosed in the notes) that we believe are necessary for the fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. These statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in our 2022 FERC Form 1. Allowance for Funds Used During Construction On June 30, 2020, FERC issued an order granting a waiver request related to the existing Allowance for Funds Used During Construction ("AFUDC") rate calculation beginning March 1, 2020, through February 28, 2021. On February 23, 2021, this waiver was extended until September 30, 2021. On September 21, 2021, it was further extended until March 31, 2022. The order provided a simplified approach that companies may elect to implement in order to minimize the significant distorted effect on the AFUDC formula resulting from increased short-term debt financing during the COVID-19 pandemic. APS adopted this simplified approach to computing the AFUDC composite rate by using a simple average of the actual historical short-term debt balances for 2019, instead of current period short-term debt balances, and left all other aspects of the AFUDC formula composite rate calculation unchanged. This change impacted the AFUDC composite rate in 2021 and for the three-month period ended March 31, 2022. Furthermore, the change in the composite rate calculation did not impact our accounting treatment for these costs. The change did not have a material impact on our financial statements. Cash and Cash Equivalents We consider cash equivalents to be highly liquid investments with a remaining maturity of three months or less at acquisition The following table summarizes supplemental APS cash flow information (dollars in thousands):
Subsequent Events Management evaluates events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date, but before the financial statements are issued or available to be issued for potential recognition or disclosures in the financial statements as required by GAAP. We have evaluated subsequent events for recognition in the financial statements through August 3, 2023, which is the date the financial statements, prepared in accordance with GAAP were issued. Management updated such evaluation for disclosure purposes through August 24, 2023. The accompanying statements contain all adjustments and disclosures necessary for fair presentation.
Significant seasonal fluctuations in our revenues are due to the effects of seasonal temperature variations on energy consumption, timing of maintenance on electric generating units, and other factors. For these reasons, amounts reported in interim periods are not necessarily indicative of amounts expected for the respective annual period.
Sources of Revenue The following table provides detail of revenue disaggregated by revenue sources (dollars in thousands):
Retail Electric Revenue. Retail electric revenue is generated by the sale of electricity to our regulated customers within the authorized service territory at tariff rates approved by the Arizona Corporation Commission ("ACC") and based on customer usage. Revenues related to the sale of electricity are generally recognized when service is rendered or electricity is delivered to customers. The billing of electricity sales to individual customers is based on the reading of their meters. We obtain customers’ meter data on a systematic basis throughout the month, and generally bill customers within a month from when service was provided. Customers are generally required to pay for services within 21 days of when the services are billed. See “Allowance for Doubtful Accounts” discussion below for additional details regarding payment terms. Wholesale Energy Sales and Transmission Services for Others. Revenues from wholesale energy sales and transmission services for others represent energy and transmission sales to wholesale customers. These activities primarily consist of managing fuel and purchased power risks in connection with the cost of serving our retail customers’ energy requirements. We may also sell into the wholesale markets generation that is not needed for APS’s retail load. Our wholesale activities and tariff rates are regulated by FERC. In the electricity business, some contracts to purchase energy are settled by netting against other contracts to sell electricity. This is referred to as a book-out, and usually occurs in contracts that have the same terms (product type, quantities, and delivery points) and for which power does not flow. We report these book-outs on a gross basis, presenting both revenues and fuel and purchased power costs. Revenue Activities Our revenues primarily consist of activities that are classified as revenues from contracts with customers. We derive our revenues from contracts with customers primarily from sales of electricity to our regulated retail customers. Revenues from contracts with customers also include wholesale and transmission activities. Our revenues from contracts with customers for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 were $1,118 million and $2,030 million, respectively, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 were $1,075 million and $1,845 million, respectively. We have certain revenues that do not meet the specific accounting criteria to be classified as revenues from contracts with customers. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, our revenues that do not qualify as revenue from contracts with customers were $10 million and $33 million, respectively, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 were $(2) million and $10 million, respectively. This amount includes revenues related to certain regulatory cost recovery mechanisms that are considered alternative revenue programs. We recognize revenue associated with alternative revenue programs when specific events permitting recognition are completed. Certain amounts associated with alternative revenue programs will subsequently be billed to customers; however, we do not reclassify billed amounts into revenue from contracts with customers. See Note 6 for a discussion of our regulatory cost recovery mechanisms. Contract Assets and Liabilities from Contracts with Customers There were no material contract assets, contract liabilities, or deferred contract costs recorded on the Comparative Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2023, or December 31, 2022. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts The allowance for doubtful accounts represents our best estimate of accounts receivable and accrued unbilled revenues that will ultimately be uncollectible due to credit loss risk. The allowance includes a write-off component that is calculated by applying an estimated write-off factor to retail electric revenues. The write-off factor used to estimate uncollectible accounts is based upon consideration of historical collections experience, the current and forecasted economic environment, changes to our collection policies, and management’s best estimate of future collections success. We continue to monitor the impacts of our disconnection policies, payment arrangements, among other considerations impacting our estimated write-off factor and allowance for doubtful accounts. The following table provides a rollforward of the allowance for doubtful accounts (dollars in thousands):
APS maintains committed revolving credit facilities in order to enhance liquidity and provide credit support for their commercial paper programs, to refinance indebtedness, and for other general corporate purposes. On April 10, 2023, APS replaced its two $500 million revolving credit facilities that would have matured on May 28, 2026, with a new $1.25 billion revolving credit facility that matures on April 10, 2028. APS has the option to increase the amount of the facility up to a maximum of $400 million, for a total of $1.65 billion, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions and with the consent of the lenders. Interest rates are based on APS’s senior unsecured debt credit ratings and the agreement includes a sustainability-linked pricing metric which permits an interest rate reduction or increase by meeting or missing targets related to specific environmental and employee health and safety sustainability objectives. This facility is available to support APS’s general corporate purposes, including support for APS’s commercial paper program, which was increased from $750 million to $1 billion on April 10, 2023, for bank borrowings or for issuances of letters of credit. At June 30, 2023, APS had no outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facilities, no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities, and $285 million of outstanding commercial paper borrowings. On January 6, 2023, Pinnacle West contributed $150 million into APS in the form of an equity infusion. APS used this contribution to repay short-term indebtedness. On June 30, 2023, APS issued $500 million of 5.55% unsecured senior notes that mature August 1, 2033. The net proceeds from the sale were used to repay short-term indebtedness consisting of commercial paper and for general corporate purposes. See “Financial Assurances” in Note 10 for a discussion of other outstanding letters of credit. Debt Fair Value Our long-term debt fair value estimates are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The following table presents the estimated fair value of our long-term debt, including current maturities (dollars in thousands):
2022 Retail Rate Case APS filed an application with the ACC on October 28, 2022 (the “2022 Rate Case”) seeking an increase in annual retail base rates on the date rates become effective (“Day 1”) of a net $460 million. This Day 1 net impact represents a total base revenue deficiency of $772 million offset by proposed adjustor transfers of cost recovery to annual retail rates and adjustor mechanism modifications. The average annual customer bill impact of APS’s request on Day 1 is an increase of 13.6%. The principal provisions of APS’s application are: •a test year comprised of twelve months ended June 30, 2022, adjusted as described below; •an original cost rate base of $10.5 billion, which approximates the ACC-jurisdictional portion of the book value of utility assets, net of accumulated depreciation and other credits; •the following proposed capital structure and costs of capital:
•a 1% return on the increment of fair value rate base above APS’s original cost rate base, as provided for by Arizona law; •a rate of $0.038321 per kWh for the portion of APS’s retail base rates attributable to fuel and purchased power costs (“Base Fuel Rate”); •modification of its adjustment mechanisms including: ▪eliminate the Environmental Improvement Surcharge (“EIS”) and collect costs through base rates, ▪eliminate the Lost Fixed Cost Recovery (“LFCR”) mechanism and collect costs through base rates and the Demand Side Management Adjustment Charge (“DSMAC”), ▪maintain as inactive the Tax Expense Adjustor Mechanism (“TEAM”), ▪maintain the Transmission Cost Adjustment ("TCA") mechanism, ▪modify the performance incentive in the DSMAC, and ▪modify the Renewable Energy Adjustment Charge (“REAC”) to include recovery of capital carrying costs of APS owned renewable and storage resources; •changes to its limited-income program, including a second tier to provide an additional discount for customers with greater need; and •twelve months of post-Test Year plant investments to reflect used and useful projects that will be placed into service prior to July 1, 2023. On June 5, 2023 and June 15, 2023, the ACC Staff, the Residential Utility Consumer Office (“RUCO”) and other intervenors filed their initial written testimony with the ACC. The ACC Staff recommends, among other things, (i) a $251 million revenue increase or, as an alternative, a $312 million revenue increase, (ii) a 9.6% return on equity, (iii) a 0.0% fair value increment or, as an alternative, a 0.75% fair value increment, and (iv) a continuation of a 12-month post-test year plant. RUCO recommends, among other things, (i) an $84.9 million revenue increase, (ii) an 8.2% return on equity or, as an alternative, an 8.7% return on equity if the ACC imputes a hypothetical capital structure with a 46% equity layer, (iii) a fair value increment of 0.0%, and (iv) a reduction of post-test year plant to six months. On July 12, 2023, APS filed rebuttal testimony addressing the ACC Staff and intervenors’ direct testimonies. The principal provisions of APS’s rebuttal testimony are: •reducing the revenue requirement increase to $383.1 million; •maintaining a return on equity request of 10.25%; •reducing the increment of fair value rate base return to 0.5% from 1.0%; •maintaining a post-test year plant request of 12 months, plus the Four Corners Effluent Limitation Guidelines (“ELG”) project; •withdrawing the Payment Fee Removal Proposal (net reduction) which was originally requested in APS’s initial application; •maintaining the LFCR mechanism and DSMAC as separate adjustors; •increasing the Power Supply Adjustment (“PSA”) annual rate change limit from $0.004/kWh to $0.006/kWh; •proposing a new System Reliability Benefit (“SRB”) recovery mechanism; •maintaining the REAC in its current state; •maintaining adjustor base transfers and elimination of EIS; and •maintaining the request to recover Coal Community Transition (“CCT”) funding. On July 26, 2023, the ACC Staff, RUCO and other intervenors filed their surrebuttal testimony with the ACC. The ACC Staff adjusted their initial recommendations to, among other things, (i) a $281.9 million revenue increase, (ii) a 9.68% return on equity, (iii) a 0.5% fair value increment, (iv) a continuation of a 12-month post-test year plant that includes the Four Corners ELG project, and (v) support of an increase to the annual PSA increase limit to $0.006/kWh. RUCO maintained their direct position and also recommended further review of the PSA in a second phase of the 2022 Rate Case. APS’s rejoinder testimony is due on August 4, 2023. APS requested that the increase become effective December 1, 2023. The hearing for this rate case is currently scheduled to begin in August 2023. APS cannot predict the outcome of its request. 2019 Retail Rate Case On October 31, 2019, APS filed an application with the ACC for an annual increase in retail base rates (the “2019 Rate Case”). On August 2, 2021, an Administrative Law Judge issued a Recommended Opinion and Order in the 2019 Rate Case (the “2019 Rate Case ROO”) and issued corrections on September 10 and September 20, 2021. The 2019 Rate Case ROO recommended, among other things, (i) a $111 million decrease in annual revenue requirements, (ii) a return on equity of 9.16%, (iii) a 0.30% return on the increment of fair value rate base greater than original cost, with total fair value rate of return further adjusted to include a 0.03% reduction to return on equity resulting in an effective fair value rate of return of 4.95%, (iv) the nonrecovery of the deferral and rate base effects of the operating costs and construction of the Four Corners Power Plant (“Four Corners”) selective catalytic reduction (“SCR”) project (see “Four Corners SCR Cost Recovery” below for additional information), (v) the recovery of the deferral and rate base effects of the operating costs and construction of the Ocotillo modernization project, which includes a reduction in the return on the deferral, (vi) a 15% disallowance of annual amortization of the Navajo Generating Station (the “Navajo Plant”) regulatory asset recovery related to the closure of the Navajo Plant (see “Navajo Plant” below), (vii) the denial of the request to defer, until APS’s next general rate case, the increase or decrease in its Arizona property taxes attributable to tax rate changes, and (viii) a collaborative process to review and recommend revisions to APS’s adjustment mechanisms within 12 months after the date of the decision. The 2019 Rate Case ROO also recommended that the CCT plan related to the closure or future closure of coal-fired generation facilities include the following components: (i) $50 million that will be paid over 10 years to the Navajo Nation, (ii) $5 million that will be paid over five years to the Navajo County Communities surrounding Cholla Power Plant (“Cholla”), and (iii) $1.675 million that will be paid to the Hopi Tribe related to APS’s ownership interests in the Navajo Plant. These amounts would be recoverable from APS’s customers through the Arizona Renewable Energy Standard and Tariff (“RES”) adjustment mechanism. APS filed exceptions on September 13, 2021, regarding the disallowance of the SCR cost deferrals and plant investments that was recommended in the 2019 Rate Case ROO, among other issues. On October 6, 2021 and October 27, 2021, the ACC voted on various amendments to the 2019 Rate Case ROO that would result in, among other things, (i) a return on equity of 8.70%, which includes a 20-basis point penalty, (ii) the recovery of the deferral and rate base effects of the operating costs and construction of the Four Corners SCR project, with the exception of $215.5 million (see “Four Corners SCR Cost Recovery” below), (iii) that the CCT plan include the following components: (a) a payment of $1 million to the Hopi Tribe within 60 days of the 2019 Rate Case decision, (b) a payment of $10 million over three years to the Navajo Nation, (c) a payment of $0.5 million to the Navajo County communities within 60 days of the 2019 Rate Case decision, (d) up to $1.25 million for electrification of homes and businesses on the Hopi reservation, and (e) up to $1.25 million for the electrification of homes and businesses on the Navajo Nation reservation. These payments and expenditures are attributable to the future closures of Four Corners and Cholla, along with the prior closure of the Navajo Plant and all ordered payments and expenditures would be recoverable through rates, and (iv) a change in the residential on-peak time-of-use period from 3 p.m. to 8 p.m. to 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. The 2019 Rate Case ROO, as amended, resulted in a total annual revenue decrease for APS of $4.8 million, excluding temporary payments and expenditures, under the CCT plan. On November 2, 2021, the ACC approved the 2019 Rate Case ROO, as amended. Consistent with the 2019 Rate Case decision, APS implemented the new rates effective as of December 1, 2021. In addition, the ACC ordered extensive compliance and reporting obligations. APS completed the implementation of the new on-peak hours for residential customers before the September 1, 2022 deadline. Additionally, consistent with the 2019 Rate Case decision, as of July 2023, APS completed the following payments that will be recoverable through rates related to the CCT: (i) $6.66 million to the Navajo Nation; (ii) $0.5 million to the Navajo County communities; and (iii) $1 million to the Hopi Tribe. Consistent with APS’s commitment to the impacted communities, APS has also completed the following payments: (i) $1 million to the Navajo Nation for CCT; (ii) $1.1 million to the Navajo County Communities for CCT and economic development; and (iii) $1.25 million to the Hopi Tribe for CCT and economic development. The ACC has also authorized $1.25 million to be recovered through rates for electrification of homes and businesses on both the Navajo Nation and Hopi reservation. Expenditure of the recoverable funds for electrification of homes and businesses on the Navajo Nation and the Hopi reservations is contingent upon completion of a census of the unelectrified homes and businesses in each that are also within APS service territory. On November 24, 2021, APS filed an application for rehearing of the 2019 Rate Case with the ACC and the application was deemed denied on December 15, 2021, as the ACC did not act upon it. On December 17, 2021, APS filed its Notice of Direct Appeal at the Arizona Court of Appeals and a Petition for Special Action with the Arizona Supreme Court, requesting review of the disallowance of $215.5 million of Four Corners SCR plant investments and deferrals (see “Four Corners SCR Cost Recovery” below for additional information) and the 20-basis-point penalty reduction to the return on equity, among other things. On February 8, 2022, the Arizona Supreme Court declined to accept jurisdiction on APS’s Petition for Special Action. The Arizona Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on November 30, 2022. On March 6, 2023, the Court issued its opinion in this matter, affirming in part and reversing in part the ACC’s decision in the 2019 Rate Case. The Court vacated the 20-basis-point penalty included in the ACC’s allowed return on equity, as the Court determined the use of customer service metrics to justify the reduction exceeded the ACC’s ratemaking authority. Additionally, the Court vacated the disallowance of $215.5 million of APS’s Four Corners SCR investment. The Court remanded the issue to the ACC for further proceedings. The ACC requested an extension of the 30-day deadline to appeal the matter to the Arizona Supreme Court, and the Arizona Supreme Court granted the extension of the deadline to May 8, 2023. The ACC filed an appeal on May 8, 2023, and on May 15, 2023, requested a suspension of the case to allow for settlement discussions between the parties, which was approved by the Court. On June 14, 2023, APS and the ACC Legal Division filed a joint resolution to allow recovery of the $215.5 million in costs related to the installation of the Four Corners SCR, a reversal of the 20-basis point reduction to APS’s return on equity from 8.9% to 8.7% as a result of the 2019 Rate Case Decision, and recovery of $59.6 million in revenue lost by APS between December of 2021 and June 20, 2023. On June 21, 2023, the ACC approved the joint resolution, and the proposals in the joint resolution became effective on July 1, 2023. On July 18, 2023, the Sierra Club filed an application for rehearing of the Commission’s decision. If the Commission does not grant the application within 20 days, it will be deemed denied. The Sierra Club will have 30 days after resolution of its request for rehearing to file a notice of appeal to Arizona Court of Appeals. Matter of Impact of the Closures of Fossil-Based Generation Plan on Impacted Communities On September 28, 2022, ACC Staff filed their staff report in the Matter of Impact of the Closures of Fossil-Based Generation Plan on Impacted Communities. APS and other interested parties filed comments on the report. On October 21, 2022, ACC Staff filed a revised report and proposed order. The revised report and proposed order recommended that funds for CCT shall not be collected from rate payers. On December 8, 2022, the ACC voted against ACC Staff’s proposed order, and on April 17, 2023, the ACC closed the docket. Any further action on CCT issues will take place in utility rate cases, including the currently pending 2022 Rate Case. APS cannot predict the outcome of this matter. Information Technology ACC Investigation On December 16, 2021, the ACC opened an investigation into various matters related to APS’s Information Technology department, including information about technology projects, costs, vendor management leadership and decision making. APS is cooperating with the investigation. APS cannot predict the outcome of this matter. 2016 Retail Rate Case Filing and the 2017 Settlement Agreement On June 1, 2016, APS filed an application with the ACC for an annual increase in retail base rates. On March 27, 2017, a majority of the stakeholders in the general retail rate case, including the ACC Staff, RUCO, limited income advocates and private rooftop solar organizations signed a settlement agreement (the “2017 Settlement Agreement”) and filed it with the ACC. The 2017 Settlement Agreement provides for, among other things, a net retail base rate increase of $94.6 million, excluding the transfer of adjustor balances, consisting of: (1) a non-fuel, non-depreciation, base rate increase of $87.2 million per year; (2) a base rate decrease of $53.6 million attributable to reduced fuel and purchased power costs; and (3) a base rate increase of $61.0 million due to changes in depreciation schedules. On August 15, 2017, the ACC approved the 2017 Settlement Agreement without material modifications, and on August 18, 2017, the ACC issued a final written Opinion and Order reflecting its decision in APS’s general retail rate case (the “2017 Rate Case Decision”). The new rates went into effect on August 19, 2017. See “Rate Plan Comparison Tool and Investigation” below for information regarding a review and investigation pertaining to the rate plan comparison tool offered to APS customers and other related issues. Cost Recovery Mechanisms APS has received regulatory decisions that allow for more timely recovery of certain costs outside of a general retail rate case through the following recovery mechanisms. See “2022 Retail Rate Case” above for proposed modifications of adjustment mechanisms in the 2022 Rate Case. Renewable Energy Standard. In 2006, the ACC approved the RES. Under the RES, electric utilities that are regulated by the ACC must supply an increasing percentage of their retail electric energy sales from eligible renewable resources, including solar, wind, biomass, biogas and geothermal technologies. In order to achieve these requirements, the ACC allows APS to include a RES surcharge as part of customer bills to recover the approved amounts for use on renewable energy projects. Each year, APS is required to file a five-year implementation plan with the ACC and seek approval for funding the upcoming year’s RES budget. In 2015, the ACC revised the RES rules to allow the ACC to consider all available information, including the number of rooftop solar arrays in a utility’s service territory, to determine compliance with the RES. On July 1, 2020, APS filed its 2021 RES Implementation Plan and proposed a budget of approximately $84.7 million. APS’s budget request supported existing approved projects and commitments and requested a permanent waiver of the RES residential distributed energy requirement for 2021. In the 2021 RES Implementation Plan, APS requested $4.5 million to meet revenue requirements associated with the APS Solar Communities program to complete installations delayed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The APS Solar Communities program was originally a 3-year program authorizing APS to spend $10 million to $15 million in capital costs each year to install utility-owned distributed renewable energy (“DG”) systems for low to moderate income residential homes, non-profit entities, Title I schools and rural government facilities. On June 7, 2021, the ACC approved the 2021 RES Implementation Plan, including APS’s requested waiver of the residential distributed energy requirements for 2021. As part of the approval, the ACC approved the requested budget and authorized APS to collect $68.3 million through the REAC to support APS’s RES programs. In June 2021, the ACC adopted a clean energy rules package which would require APS to meet certain clean energy standards and technology procurement mandates, obtain approval for its action plan included in its IRP, and seek cost recovery in a rate process. Since the adopted clean energy rules differed substantially from the original Recommended Order and Opinion, supplemental rulemaking procedures were required before the rules could become effective. On January 26, 2022, the ACC reversed its prior decision and declined to send the final draft energy rules through the rulemaking process. Instead, the ACC opened a new docket to consider all-source requests for proposals (“RFP”) requirements and the IRP process. See “Energy Modernization Plan” below for more information. On July 1, 2021, APS filed its 2022 RES Implementation Plan and proposed a budget of approximately $93.1 million. APS filed an amended 2022 RES Implementation Plan on December 9, 2021, with a proposed budget of $100.5 million. This budget included funding for programs to comply with the decision in the 2019 Rate Case, including the ACC authorizing spending $20 million to $30 million in capital costs for the continuation of the APS Solar Communities program each year for a period of three years from the effective date of the 2019 Rate Case decision. APS’s budget proposal supported existing approved projects and commitments and requests a waiver of the RES residential and non-residential distributed energy requirements for 2022. On May 18, 2022, the ACC approved the 2022 RES Implementation Plan, including an amendment requiring a stakeholder working group convene to develop a community solar program for the Commission’s consideration at a future date. On September 23, 2022, APS filed a community solar proposal in compliance with the ACC order that was informed by a stakeholder working group. APS proposed a small, pilot-scale program size of up to 140 MW that would be selected through a competitive RFP. The ACC has not yet ruled on the proposal. However, on November 10, 2022, the ACC approved a bifurcated community solar process, directing ACC Staff to develop a statewide policy through additional stakeholder involvement and establishing a separate evidentiary hearing to define other policy components. The community solar program was deferred to the ACC’s Hearing Division so that a formal evidentiary hearing could be held to consider issues of substance related to community solar. APS cannot predict the outcomes of these future activities. On July 1, 2022, APS filed its 2023 RES Implementation Plan and proposed a budget of approximately $86.2 million, excluding any funding offsets. This budget contained funding for programs to comply with Commission-approved initiatives, including the 2019 Rate Case decision. APS’s budget proposal supported existing approved projects and commitments and requested a waiver of the RES residential and non-residential distributed energy requirements for 2022. On November 10, 2022, the ACC approved the 2023 RES Implementation Plan, including APS’s requested waiver of the distributed energy requirement for 2023. On June 30, 2023, APS filed its 2024 RES Implementation Plan and proposed a budget of approximately $95.1 million. APS’s budget proposal supports existing approved projects and commitments and requests a waiver of the RES renewable energy credit requirements to demonstrate compliance with the Annual Renewable Energy Requirement for 2023. The ACC has not yet ruled on the 2024 RES Implementation Plan. Demand Side Management Adjustor Charge. The ACC Electric Energy Efficiency Standards require APS to submit a DSM Plan annually for review and approval by the ACC. Verified energy savings from APS’s resource savings projects can be counted toward compliance with the Electric Energy Efficiency Standards; however, APS is not allowed to count savings from systems savings projects toward determination of the achievement of performance incentives, nor may APS include savings from these system savings projects in the calculation of its LFCR mechanism. See below for discussion of the LFCR. On December 31, 2019, APS filed its 2020 DSM Plan, which requested a budget of $51.9 million and continued APS’s focus on DSM strategies such as peak demand reduction, load shifting, storage and electrification strategies. The 2020 DSM Plan addressed all components of the pending 2018 and 2019 DSM plans, which enabled the ACC to review the 2020 DSM Plan only. On May 15, 2020, APS filed an amended 2020 DSM Plan to provide assistance to customers experiencing economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. The amended 2020 DSM Plan requested the same budget amount of $51.9 million. On September 23, 2020, the ACC approved the amended 2020 DSM Plan. On April 17, 2020, APS filed an application with the ACC requesting a COVID-19 emergency relief package to provide additional assistance to its customers. On May 5, 2020, the ACC approved APS returning $36 million that had been collected through the DSM Adjustor Charge, but not allocated for current DSM programs, directly to customers through a bill credit in June 2020. APS refunded approximately $43 million to customers. The additional $7 million over the ACC-approved amount was the result of the kWh credit being based on historic consumption, which was different than actual consumption during the refund period. The difference was recorded to the DSM balancing account and was included in the 2021 DSM Implementation Plan, as described below. On December 31, 2020, APS filed its 2021 DSM Implementation Plan, which requested a budget of $63.7 million and continued APS’s focus on DSM strategies, such as peak demand reduction, load shifting, storage and electrification strategies, as well as enhanced assistance to customers impacted economically by COVID-19. On April 6, 2021, APS filed an amended 2021 DSM Implementation Plan that proposed an additional one-time incentive for customers participating in the residential energy storage pilot program approved in the 2020 RES Implementation Plan. On July 13, 2021, the ACC approved the amended 2021 DSM Implementation Plan. On December 17, 2021, APS filed its 2022 DSM Implementation Plan in accordance with an extension granted in 2021. The 2022 DSM Plan requested a budget of $78.4 million and represents an increase of approximately $14 million in DSM spending above 2021. On November 10, 2022, the ACC approved the 2022 DSM Implementation Plan, including a proposed performance incentive. On November 30, 2022, APS filed its 2023 DSM Implementation Plan, which requested a budget of $88 million. On May 31, 2023, APS filed an amended 2023 DSM Implementation Plan. The amended plan maintains the originally proposed budget of $88 million. The ACC has not yet ruled on the 2023 DSM Implementation Plan. In accordance with an extension granted by the ACC, APS intends to file its 2024 DSM Implementation Plan by November 30, 2023. Power Supply Adjustor Mechanism and Balance. The Power Supply Adjustor (“PSA”) provides for the adjustment of retail rates to reflect variations primarily in retail fuel and purchased power costs. The PSA is subject to specified parameters and procedures, including the following: •APS records deferrals for recovery or refund to the extent actual retail fuel and purchased power costs vary from the Base Fuel Rate; •an adjustment to the PSA rate is made annually each February 1 (unless otherwise approved by the ACC) and goes into effect automatically unless suspended by the ACC; •the PSA uses a forward-looking estimate of fuel and purchased power costs to set the annual PSA rate, which is reconciled to actual costs experienced for each PSA Year (February 1 through January 31) (see the following bullet point); •the PSA rate includes (a) a “forward component,” under which APS recovers or refunds differences between expected fuel and purchased power costs for the upcoming calendar year and those embedded in the Base Fuel Rate; (b) a “historical component,” under which differences between actual fuel and purchased power costs and those recovered or refunded through the combination of the Base Fuel Rate and the Forward Component are recovered during the next PSA Year; and (c) a “transition component,” under which APS may seek mid-year PSA changes due to large variances between actual fuel and purchased power costs and the combination of the Base Fuel Rate and the Forward Component; and •the PSA rate may not be increased or decreased more than $0.004 per kWh in a year without permission of the ACC. The following table shows the changes in the deferred fuel and purchased power regulatory asset for 2023 and 2022 (dollars in thousands):
On November 30, 2020, APS filed its PSA rate for the PSA year beginning February 1, 2021. That rate was $0.003544 per kWh, which consisted of a forward component of $0.003434 per kWh and a historical component of $0.000110 per kWh. The 2021 PSA rate was a $0.004 per kWh increase compared to the 2020 PSA year, which is the maximum permitted under the Plan of Administration for the PSA. This left $215.9 million of fuel and purchased power costs above this annual cap which was reflected in future year resets of the PSA. These rates were to be effective on February 1, 2021, but APS delayed the effectiveness of these rates until the first billing cycle of April 2021 due to concerns of the impact on customers during COVID-19. In March 2021, the ACC voted to implement the 2021 PSA rate on a staggered basis, with 50% of the rate increase taking effect in April 2021, and the remaining 50% taking effect in November 2021. The PSA rate implemented on April 1, 2021 was $0.001544 per kWh, which consisted of a forward component of $(0.004444) per kWh and a historical component of $0.005988 per kWh. On November 1, 2021, the remaining increase was implemented to a rate of $0.003544 per kWh and consisted of a forward component of $(0.004444) per kWh and a historical component of $0.007988 per kWh. As part of this approval, the ACC ordered ACC Staff to conduct a fuel and purchased power procurement audit to better understand the factors that contributed to the increase in fuel costs. On April 1, 2022, the ACC filed a final report of its third-party audit findings regarding APS’s fuel and purchased power costs for the period January 2019 through January 2021. The report contains an in-depth review of APS’s fuel and purchased power contracts, its monthly fuel accounting activities, its forecasting and dispatching procedures, and its monthly PSA filings, among other fuel-related activities. The report finds that APS’s fuel processing accounting practices, dispatching procedures, and procedures for hedging activity are reasonable and appropriate. The report includes several recommendations for the ACC’s consideration, including review of current contracts, maintenance schedules, and certain changes and improvements to the schedules in APS’s monthly PSA filings. On December 27, 2022, ACC Staff filed a proposed order supporting adoption of the recommendations in the third-party audit report, and the ACC approved the proposed order on February 22, 2023. On November 30, 2021, APS filed its PSA rate for the PSA year beginning February 1, 2022. That rate was $0.007544 per kWh, which consisted of a forward component of $(0.004842) per kWh and a historical component of $0.012386 per kWh. The 2022 PSA rate was a $0.004 per kWh increase compared to the 2021 PSA year, which is the maximum permitted under the Plan of Administration for the PSA. These rates went into effect as filed on February 1, 2022. On November 30, 2022, APS filed its PSA rate for the PSA year beginning February 1, 2023. To address the growing under-collected PSA balance, APS also requested that one of three different options be adopted, including a temporary or permanent increase of the annual cap to $0.006 per kWh. On February 23, 2023, the ACC approved an overall PSA rate of $0.019074 per kWh, which consisted of a forward component of $(0.005527) per kWh, a historical component of $0.013071 per kWh and a transition component of $0.011530 per kWh, that will continue until further notice of the ACC. The rate became effective with the first billing cycle in March 2023 and is designed to bring the PSA balancing account to near-zero over a 24-month period. APS is also required to notify the ACC when the PSA balancing account approaches $0.5 million. In accordance with the PSA Plan of Administration, APS is required to seek ACC approval to recover costs related to third-party energy storage systems through its PSA adjustment mechanism. To date in 2023, APS has executed six energy storage PPAs whose costs have been approved for recovery through the PSA. APS executed one energy storage PPA in 2022 that was approved for cost-recovery through the PSA and four in 2021, excluding one energy storage PPA that was approved but later terminated by APS due to project delays. Environmental Improvement Surcharge (“EIS”). The EIS permits APS to recover the capital carrying costs (rate of return, depreciation and taxes) plus incremental operations and maintenance expenses associated with environmental improvements made outside of a test year to comply with environmental standards set by federal, state, tribal, or local laws and regulations. A filing is made on or before February 1 each year for qualified environmental improvements since the prior rate case test year, and the new charge becomes effective April 1 unless suspended by the ACC. The EIS includes an overall cap of $0.0005 per kWh (approximately $13 million to $15 million per year). APS’s February 1, 2023 application requested an increase in the charge to $14.7 million, or $3.3 million over the prior-period charge. On March 10, 2023, APS filed an amended application requesting an EIS charge of $4.0 million, a decrease of $10.7 million from the February EIS request and a decrease of $7.5 million from the prior-period charge. The revised 2023 EIS became effective with the first billing cycle in April 2023. Transmission Rates, Transmission Cost Adjustor (“TCA”) and Other Transmission Matters. In July 2008, FERC approved a modification to APS’s Open Access Transmission Tariff to allow APS to move from fixed rates to a formula rate-setting methodology in order to more accurately reflect and recover the costs that APS incurs in providing transmission services. A large portion of the rate represents charges for transmission services to serve APS’s retail customers (“Retail Transmission Charges”). In order to recover the Retail Transmission Charges, APS was previously required to file an application with, and obtain approval from, the ACC to reflect changes in Retail Transmission Charges through the TCA. Under the terms of the settlement agreement entered into in 2012 regarding APS’s rate case (“2012 Settlement Agreement”), however, an adjustment to rates to recover the Retail Transmission Charges will be made annually each June 1 and will go into effect automatically unless suspended by the ACC. The formula rate is updated each year effective June 1 on the basis of APS’s actual cost of service, as disclosed in APS’s FERC Form 1 report for the previous fiscal year. Items to be updated include actual capital expenditures made as compared with previous projections, transmission revenue credits and other items. APS reviews the proposed formula rate filing amounts with the ACC Staff. Any items or adjustments which are not agreed to by APS and the ACC Staff can remain in dispute until settled or litigated with FERC. Settlement or litigated resolution of disputed issues could require an extended period of time and could have a significant effect on the Retail Transmission Charges because any adjustment, though applied prospectively, may be calculated to account for previously over- or under-collected amounts. The resolution of proposed adjustments can result in significant volatility in the revenues to be collected. On March 17, 2020, APS submitted a filing to make modifications to its annual transmission formula to provide additional transparency for excess and deficient accumulated deferred income taxes resulting from the Tax Cuts and Job Act (the “Tax Act”), as well as for future local, state, and federal statutory tax rate changes. APS amended its March 17, 2020 filing on April 28, 2020, September 29, 2021, and October 27, 2021. In January 2022, FERC approved APS’s modifications to its annual transmission formula. Effective June 1, 2021, APS’s annual wholesale transmission revenue requirement for all users of its transmission system increased by approximately $4 million for the 12-month period beginning June 1, 2021, in accordance with the FERC-approved formula. Of this net amount, wholesale customer rates decreased by approximately $3.2 million and retail customer rates would have increased by approximately $7.2 million. However, since changes in Retail Transmission Charges are reflected through the TCA after consideration of transmission recovery in retail base rates and the ACC-approved balancing account, the retail revenue requirement decreased by $28.4 million, resulting in reductions to both residential and commercial rates. An adjustment to APS’s retail rates to recover FERC-approved transmission charges went into effect automatically on June 1, 2021. Effective June 1, 2022, APS’s annual wholesale transmission revenue requirement for all users of its transmission system decreased by approximately $33 million for the 12-month period beginning June 1, 2022, in accordance with the FERC-approved formula. Of this net amount, wholesale customer rates decreased by approximately $6.4 million and retail customer rates would have decreased by approximately $26.6 million. However, since changes in Retail Transmission Charges are reflected through the TCA after consideration of transmission recovery in retail base rates and the ACC approved balancing account, the retail revenue requirement decreased by $2.4 million, resulting in a reduction to the residential rate and increases to commercial rates. An adjustment to APS’s retail rates to recover FERC-approved transmission charges went into effect automatically on June 1, 2022. Effective June 1, 2023, APS’s annual wholesale transmission revenue requirement for all users of its transmission system increased by approximately $34.7 million for the 12-month period beginning June 1, 2023, in accordance with the FERC-approved formula. Of this net amount, wholesale customer rates increased by approximately $20.7 million and retail customer rates would have increased by approximately $14 million. However, since changes in Retail Transmission Charges are reflected through the TCA after consideration of transmission recovery in retail base rates and the ACC approved balancing account, the retail revenue requirement decreased by $10 million, resulting in reductions to the residential and commercial rates. An adjustment to APS’s retail rates to recover FERC-approved transmission charges went into effect automatically on June 1, 2023. Lost Fixed Cost Recovery Mechanism. The LFCR mechanism permits APS to recover on an after-the-fact basis a portion of its fixed costs that would otherwise have been collected by APS in the kWh sales lost due to APS energy efficiency programs and to DG such as rooftop solar arrays. The fixed costs recoverable by the LFCR mechanism were 2.50 cents for both lost residential and non-residential kWh as set forth in the 2017 Settlement Agreement. The fixed costs recoverable by the LFCR mechanism are currently 2.56 cents for lost residential kWh and 2.68 cents for lost non-residential kWh as set forth in the 2019 Rate Case decision. The LFCR adjustment has a year-over-year cap of 1% of retail revenues. Any amounts left unrecovered in a particular year because of this cap can be carried over for recovery in a future year. The kWhs lost from energy efficiency are based on a third-party evaluation of APS’s energy efficiency programs. DG sales losses are determined from the metered output from the DG units. On February 15, 2021, APS filed its 2021 annual LFCR adjustment, requesting that effective May 1, 2021, the annual LFCR recovery amount be increased to $38.5 million (an $11.8 million increase from previous levels). On April 13, 2021, the ACC voted not to approve the requested $11.8 million increase to the annual LFCR adjustment; thus, the previously approved rates continued to remain intact and the $11.8 million increase was reflected in APS’s 2022 filing in accordance with the compliance requirements. As a result of the 2019 Rate Case decision, APS’s annual LFCR adjustor rate will be dependent on an annual earnings test filing, which will compare APS’s previous year’s rate of return with the related authorized rate of return. If the actual rate of return is higher than the authorized rate of return, the LFCR rate for the subsequent year is set at zero. APS determined that the changes to the LFCR mechanism, as a result of the 2019 Rate Case decision effective on December 1, 2021, did not materially impact its results of operations and financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021. However, as a result of certain changes made to the LFCR mechanism in the 2019 Rate Case decision, the mechanism no longer qualified for alternative revenue program accounting treatment, which impacts the future timing of related revenue recognition. On February 15, 2022, APS filed its 2022 annual LFCR adjustment, requesting that effective May 1, 2022, the annual LFCR recovery amount be increased to $59.1 million (a $32.5 million increase from previous levels, which was inclusive of the $11.8 million balance from the 2021 filing). On May 9, 2022, the ACC Staff filed its revised report and proposed order regarding APS’s 2022 LFCR adjustment, concluding that APS calculated the adjustment in accordance with its Plan of Administration. On May 18, 2022, the ACC approved the 2022 LFCR adjustment, with a rate effective date of June 1, 2022. On February 15, 2023, APS filed a letter to the ACC docket stating that, in accordance with Decision No. 78585, APS and ACC Staff have agreed to move the filing date for the annual LFCR adjustment to July 31 each year. On July 31, 2023, APS filed its 2023 annual LFCR adjustment, requesting that effective November 1, 2023, the annual LFCR recovery amount be increased to $68.7 million (a $9.6 million increase from previous levels). The ACC has not yet ruled on this application. Tax Expense Adjustor Mechanism. As part of the 2017 Settlement Agreement, the parties agreed to a rate adjustment mechanism to address potential federal income tax reform and enable the pass-through of certain income tax effects to customers. The TEAM expressly applies to APS’s retail rates with the exception of a small subset of customers taking service under specially-approved tariffs. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Act was enacted. This legislation made significant changes to the federal income tax laws including a reduction in the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. On August 13, 2018, APS filed a request with the ACC that addressed the return of $86.5 million in tax savings to customers related to the amortization of non-depreciation related excess deferred taxes previously collected from customers (“TEAM Phase II”). The ACC approved this request on March 13, 2019, effective the first billing cycle in April 2019 through the last billing cycle in March 2020. On March 19, 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, APS delayed the discontinuation of TEAM Phase II until the first billing cycle in May 2020. Amounts credited to customers after the last billing cycle in March 2020 were recorded as a part of the balancing account and were addressed for recovery as part of the 2019 Rate Case. Both the timing of the reduction in revenues refunded through TEAM Phase II and the offsetting income tax benefit were recognized based upon our seasonal kWh sales pattern. On April 10, 2019, APS filed a third request with the ACC that addressed the amortization of depreciation related excess deferred taxes over a 28.5-year period consistent with IRS normalization rules (“TEAM Phase III”). On October 29, 2019, the ACC approved TEAM Phase III providing both (i) a one-time bill credit of $64 million which was credited to customers on their December 2019 bills, and (ii) a monthly bill credit effective the first billing cycle in December 2019 which provided an additional benefit of $39.5 million to customers through December 31, 2020. On November 20, 2020, APS filed an application to continue the TEAM Phase III monthly bill credit through the earlier of December 31, 2021, or at the conclusion of the 2019 Rate Case. On December 9, 2020, the ACC approved this request. Both the timing of the reduction in revenues refunded through the TEAM Phase III monthly bill credit and the offsetting income tax benefit were recognized based upon APS’s seasonal kWh sales pattern. As part of the 2019 Rate Case decision, the TEAM rates were reset to zero beginning December 31, 2021, and all impacts of the Tax Act were removed from the TEAM and incorporated into APS’s base rates. The TEAM was retained to address potential changes in tax law that may be enacted prior to a decision in a subsequent APS rate case. Court Resolution Surcharge (“CRS”). The CRS mechanism permits APS to recover certain costs associated with investments and expenses for APS’s purchase and installation of SCR technology for Four Corners Units 4 and 5 and a change in APS’s allowable return on equity as required by the Arizona Court of Appeals and approved by the ACC in Decision No. 78979. The CRS went into effect on July 1, 2023 at a rate of $0.00175 per kWh. The rate is designed to recover $59.6 million in revenue lost by APS between December of 2021 and June 20, 2023, and the prospective recovery of ongoing costs related to the SCR investments and expense and the allowable return on equity difference in current base rates. The current CRS will be recalculated at the end of the 2022 Rate Case to remove the effects of the prospective recovery related to the allowable return on equity difference. The portion of the CRS representing the recovery of lost revenue between December of 2021 and June 20, 2023 will cease upon full collection of the lost revenue. Finally, recovery of ongoing costs related to the SCR investments will continue until the Company’s next rate case in which they can be incorporated therein. See “2019 Retail Rate Case” above for more information. Net Metering APS’s 2017 Rate Case Decision provides that payments by utilities for energy exported to the grid from residential DG solar facilities will be determined using a Resource Comparison Proxy (“RCP”) methodology as determined in the ACC’s generic Value and Cost of Distributed Generation docket. RCP is a method that is based on the most recent five-year rolling average price that APS incurs for utility-scale solar photovoltaic projects. The price established by this RCP method will be updated annually (between general retail rate cases) but will not be decreased by more than 10% per year. The ACC is no longer pursuing development of a forecasted avoided cost methodology as an option for utilities in place of the RCP. Commercial customers, grandfathered residential solar customers, and residential customers with DG systems other than solar facilities continue to qualify for net metering. In addition, the ACC made the following determinations in the Value and Cost of Distributed Generation docket: •RCP customers who have interconnected a DG system or submitted an application for interconnection for DG systems will be grandfathered for a period of 20 years from the date the customer’s interconnection application was accepted by the utility (for APS residential customers, as of September 1, 2017, based on APS’s 2017 Rate Case Decision); •customers with DG solar systems are to be considered a separate class of customers for ratemaking purposes; and •once an initial export price is set for utilities, no netting or banking of retail credits will be available for new DG customers, and the then-applicable export price will be guaranteed for new customers for a period of 10 years. This decision of the ACC addresses policy determinations only. The decision states that its principles will be applied in future general retail rate cases, and the policy determinations themselves may be subject to future change, as are all ACC policies. In accordance with the 2017 Rate Case Decision, APS filed its request for a RCP export energy price of 10.5 cents per kWh on May 1, 2019. This price also reflects the 10% annual reduction discussed above. The new rate rider became effective on October 1, 2019. APS filed its request for a fourth-year export energy price of 9.4 cents per kWh on May 1, 2020, with a requested effective date of September 1, 2020. This price reflects the 10% annual reduction discussed above. On September 23, 2020, the ACC approved the annual reduction of the export energy price but voted to delay the effectiveness of the reduction in export prices until October 1, 2021. In accordance with this decision, the RCP export energy price of 9.4 cents per kWh became effective on October 1, 2021. On April 29, 2022, APS filed an application to decrease the RCP price to 8.46 cents per kWh, reflecting a 10% annual reduction, to become effective September 1, 2022. On July 12, 2022, the ACC approved the RCP as filed. On May 1, 2023, APS filed an application for revisions to the RCP. This application would decrease the RCP price to 7.619 cents per kWh, reflecting a 10% annual reduction, to become effective September 1, 2023. The ACC has not yet ruled on this application. Energy Modernization Plan On January 30, 2018, the initial Energy Modernization Plan was proposed, which consisted of a series of energy policies tied to clean energy sources. Draft energy rules were subsequently issued and a series of revisions were made to the draft rules in 2019 and 2020. On July 30, 2020, the ACC Staff issued final draft energy rules which proposed 100% of retail kWh sales from clean energy resources by the end of 2050. Nuclear power was defined as a clean energy resource. The proposed rules also required 50% of retail energy served be renewable by the end of 2035. A new Energy Efficiency Standard (“EES”) was not included in the proposed rules. The ACC discussed the final draft energy rules at several different meetings in 2020 and 2021. On November 13, 2020, the ACC approved a final draft energy rules package. On April 19, 2021, the Administrative Law Judge issued a Recommended Order and Opinion on the final energy rules. In June 2021, the ACC adopted revised clean energy rules based on a series of ACC amendments. The adopted rules included a final standard of 100% clean energy by 2070 and the following interim standards for carbon reduction from baseline carbon emissions level: 50% reduction by December 31, 2032; 65% reduction by December 31, 2040; 80% reduction by December 31, 2050, and 95% reduction by December 31, 2060. Since the adopted clean energy rules differed substantially from the original Recommended Order and Opinion, supplemental rulemaking procedures were required before the rules could become effective. On January 26, 2022, the ACC reversed its prior decision and declined to send the final draft energy rules through the rulemaking process. Instead, the ACC opened a new docket to consider all-source RFP requirements and the IRP process. During the August 2022 Open Meeting, Commissioners voted to postpone a decision on the all-source RFP and IRP rulemaking package until 2023. APS cannot predict the outcome of this matter. Integrated Resource Planning ACC rules require utilities to develop triennial 15-year IRPs which describe how the utility plans to serve customer load in the plan timeframe. The ACC reviews each utility’s IRP to determine if it meets the necessary requirements and whether it should be acknowledged. In February 2022, the ACC acknowledged APS’s 2020 IRP filed on June 26, 2020. The ACC also approved certain amendments to the IRP process, including, setting an EES of 1.3% of retail sales annually (averaged over a three-year period) and a demand-side resource capacity of 35% of 2020 peak demand by January 1, 2030. On May 1, 2023, APS, Tucson Electric Power Company, and UNS Electric, Inc. filed a joint request for an extension to file the IRPs from August 1, 2023 to November 1, 2023. On June 21, 2023, the ACC granted the extension. As a result, APS intends to file its next IRP on November 1, 2023. See “Energy Modernization Plan” above for information regarding proposed changes to the IRP filings. Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act Under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (“PURPA”), qualifying facilities are provided the right to sell energy and/or capacity to utilities and are granted relief from certain regulatory burdens. On December 17, 2019, the ACC mandated a minimum contract length of 18 years for qualifying facilities over 100 kW in Arizona and established that the rate paid to qualifying facilities must be based on the long-term avoided cost. “Avoided cost” is generally defined as the price at which the utility could purchase or produce the same amount of power from sources other than the qualifying facility on a long-term basis. During calendar year 2020, APS entered into two 18-year PPAs with qualified facilities, each for 80 MW solar facilities. In March 2021, the ACC approved these agreements. On July 16, 2020, FERC issued a final rule revising FERC’s regulations implementing PURPA. The final rule went into effect on December 31, 2020. Residential Electric Utility Customer Service Disconnections On June 13, 2019, APS voluntarily suspended electric disconnections for residential customers who had not paid their bills. On June 20, 2019, the ACC voted to enact emergency rule amendments to prevent residential electric utility customer service disconnections during the period June 1 through October 15 (“Summer Disconnection Moratorium”). During the Summer Disconnection Moratorium, APS could not charge late fees and interest on amounts that were past due from customers. Customer deposits must also be used to pay delinquent amounts before disconnection can occur. In accordance with the emergency rules, APS began putting delinquent customers on a mandatory four-month payment plan beginning on October 16, 2019. In June 2019, the ACC began a formal regular rulemaking process to allow stakeholder input and time for consideration of permanent rule changes. The ACC further ordered that each regulated utility serving retail customers in Arizona update its service conditions by incorporating the emergency rule amendments, restore power to any customers who were disconnected during the month of June 2019 and credit any fees that were charged for a reconnection. The ACC Staff and ACC proposed draft amendments to the customer service disconnections rules. On April 14, 2021, the ACC voted to send to the formal rulemaking process a draft rules package governing customer disconnections that allows utilities to choose between a temperature threshold (above 95 degrees and below 32 degrees) or calendar method (June 1 – October 15) for disconnection moratoriums. On November 2, 2021, the ACC approved the final rules, and on November 23, 2021, the rules were submitted to the Arizona Office of the Attorney General for final review and approval. The new rules became effective on April 18, 2022. In accordance with the ACC service disconnection rules, APS now uses the calendar-based method to suspend the disconnection of customers for nonpayment from June 1 through October 15 each year (“Annual Disconnection Moratorium”). Customers with past due balances of $75 or greater as of the end of the Annual Disconnection Moratorium are automatically placed on six-month payment arrangements. In addition, APS voluntarily began waiving late payment fees of its customers (“Late Fee Waivers”) on March 13, 2020. Effective February 1, 2023, late payment fees for residential customers were reinstated. Late payment fees for commercial and industrial customers were reinstated effective May 1, 2022. Since the suspensions and moratoriums on disconnections began, APS has experienced an increase in bad debt expense and the related write-offs of delinquent customer accounts. Retail Electric Competition Rules On November 17, 2018, the ACC voted to re-examine the facilitation of a deregulated retail electric market in Arizona. On July 1 and July 2, 2019, ACC Staff issued a report and initial proposed draft rules regarding possible modifications to the ACC’s retail electric competition rules. On February 10, 2020, two ACC Commissioners filed two sets of draft proposed retail electric competition rules. On February 12, 2020, ACC Staff issued its second report regarding possible modifications to the ACC’s retail electric competition rules. During a July 15, 2020, ACC Staff meeting, the ACC Commissioners discussed the possible development of a retail competition pilot program, but no action was taken. The ACC continues to discuss matters related to retail electric competition, including the potential for additional buy-through programs or other pilot programs. In April 2022, the Arizona Legislature passed and the Governor signed a bill that repealed the electric deregulation law that had been in place in Arizona since 1998. APS cannot predict what impact, if any, this change will have on APS. On August 4, 2021, Green Mountain Energy filed an application seeking a certificate of convenience and necessity to allow it to provide competitive electric generation service in Arizona. Green Mountain Energy has requested that the ACC grant it the ability to provide competitive service in APS’s and Tucson Electric Power Company’s certificated service territories and proposes to deliver a 100% renewable energy product to residential and general service customers in those service territories. APS opposes Green Mountain Energy’s application. On November 3, 2021, the ACC submitted questions to the Arizona Attorney General requesting legal opinions related to a number of issues surrounding retail electric competition and the ACC’s ability to issue competitive certificates of convenience and necessity. On November 26, 2021, the Administrative Law Judge issued a procedural order indicating it would not be appropriate to set a schedule until the Attorney General has provided his insights on the applicable law. As the ACC’s questions pertained to the retail competition law subsequently repealed in April 2022, the Attorney General has not responded to the ACC’s request and the questions are now moot. No action has been taken by the ACC regarding this application since that time. However, on May 17, 2023, the Retail Energy Supply Association filed a motion with the ACC requesting it to re-open the generic docket to re-examine the ACC’s electric competition rules. No action has been taken by the ACC regarding this motion. APS cannot predict the outcome of these matters. On October 28, 2021, an ACC Commissioner docketed a letter directing ACC Staff and interested stakeholders to design a 200 to 300 MW pilot program that would allow residential and small commercial customers of APS to elect a competitive electricity supplier. The letter also states that similar programs should be designed for other Arizona regulated electric utilities. APS cannot predict the outcome of these future activities. Rate Plan Comparison Tool and Investigation On November 14, 2019, APS learned that its rate plan comparison tool was not functioning as intended due to an integration error between the tool and APS’s meter data management system. APS immediately removed the tool from its website and notified the ACC. The purpose of the tool was to provide customers with a rate plan recommendation based upon historical usage data. Upon investigation, APS determined that the error may have affected rate plan recommendations to customers between February 4, 2019, and November 14, 2019. By the middle of May 2020, APS provided refunds to approximately 13,000 potentially impacted customers equal to the difference between what they paid for electricity and the amount they would have paid had they selected their most economical rate, as applicable, and a $25 payment for any inconvenience that the customer may have experienced. The refunds and payment for inconvenience being provided did not have a material impact on APS’s financial statements. In February 2020, APS launched a new online rate comparison tool. The ACC hired an outside consultant to evaluate the extent of the error and the overall effectiveness of the tool. On August 20, 2020, ACC Staff filed the outside consultant’s report on APS’s rate comparison tool. The report concluded APS’s new rate comparison tool is working as intended. The report also identified a small population of additional customers that may have been affected by the error and APS has provided refunds and the $25 inconvenience payment to approximately 3,800 additional customers. These additional refunds and payment for inconvenience did not have a material impact on APS’s financial statements. On September 28, 2020, the ACC discussed this report but did not take any action. APS cannot predict whether additional inquiries or actions may be taken by the ACC. Four Corners SCR Cost Recovery On December 29, 2017, in accordance with the 2017 Rate Case Decision, APS filed a Notice of Intent to file its SCR Adjustment to permit recovery of costs associated with the installation of SCR equipment at Four Corners Units 4 and 5. APS filed the SCR Adjustment request in April 2018. The SCR Adjustment request provided that there would be a $67.5 million annual revenue impact that would be applied as a percentage of base rates for all applicable customers. Also, as provided for in the 2017 Rate Case Decision, APS requested that the adjustment become effective no later than January 1, 2019. The hearing for this matter occurred in September 2018. At the hearing, APS accepted ACC Staff’s recommendation of a lower annual revenue impact of approximately $58.5 million. The Administrative Law Judge issued a Recommended Opinion and Order finding that the costs for the SCR project were prudently incurred and recommending authorization of the $58.5 million annual revenue requirement related to the installation and operation of the SCRs. The ACC did not issue a decision on this matter. APS included the costs for the SCR project in the retail rate base in its 2019 Rate Case filing with the ACC. On November 2, 2021, the 2019 Rate Case decision was approved by the ACC allowing approximately $194 million of SCR related plant investments and cost deferrals in rate base and to recover, depreciate and amortize in rates based on an end-of-life assumption of July 2031. The decision also included a partial and combined disallowance of $215.5 million on the SCR investments and deferrals. APS believes the SCR plant investments and related SCR cost deferrals were prudently incurred, and on December 17, 2021, APS filed its Notice of Direct Appeal at the Arizona Court of Appeals requesting review of the $215.5 million disallowance. The Arizona Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on November 30, 2022. On March 6, 2023, the Court of Appeals issued its order in the matter, vacating the ACC’s disallowance of the SCR investment and remanding the matter back to the ACC for further review in accordance with ACC rules and the order of the Court of Appeals. On June 21, 2023, the ACC approved a joint settlement filed by APS and the ACC’s Legal Division that resolved all issues relating to the 2019 Rate Case decision, including recovery of the cost of the Four Corners SCRs. See above for further discussion on the 2019 Rate Case decision. Cholla On September 11, 2014, APS announced that it would close Unit 2 of the Cholla Power Plant (“Cholla”) and cease burning coal at the other APS-owned units (Units 1 and 3) at the plant by the mid-2020s, if the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) approved a compromise proposal offered by APS to meet required environmental and emissions standards and rules. On April 14, 2015, the ACC approved APS’s plan to retire Unit 2, without expressing any view on the future recoverability of APS’s remaining investment in the unit. APS closed Unit 2 on October 1, 2015. In early 2017, EPA approved a final rule incorporating APS’s compromise proposal, which took effect on April 26, 2017. In December 2019, PacifiCorp notified APS that it planned to retire Cholla Unit 4 by the end of 2020 and the unit ceased operation in December 2020. APS is required to cease burning coal at its remaining Cholla units by April 2025. Previously, APS estimated Cholla Unit 2’s end of life to be 2033. APS has been recovering a return on and of the net book value of the unit in base rates. Pursuant to the 2017 Settlement Agreement described above, APS will be allowed continued recovery of the net book value of the unit and the unit’s decommissioning and other retirement-related costs, $34.9 million as of June 30, 2023, in addition to a return on its investment. In accordance with GAAP, in the third quarter of 2014, Unit 2’s remaining net book value was reclassified from property, plant and equipment to a regulatory asset. In accordance with the 2019 Rate Case decision, the regulatory asset is being amortized through 2033. Navajo Plant The Navajo Plant ceased operations in November 2019. The co-owners and the Navajo Nation executed a lease extension on November 29, 2017, that allows for decommissioning activities to begin after the plant ceased operations. In accordance with GAAP, in the second quarter of 2017, APS’s remaining net book value of its interest in the Navajo Plant was reclassified from property, plant and equipment to a regulatory asset. APS has been recovering a return on and of the net book value of its interest in the Navajo plant in base rates over its previously estimated life through 2026. Pursuant to the 2019 Rate Case decision described above, APS will be allowed continued recovery of the book value of its remaining investment in the Navajo plant, $47.8 million as of June 30, 2023, in addition to a return on the net book value, with the exception of 15% of the annual amortization expense in rates. In addition, APS will be allowed recovery of other costs related to retirement and closure, including the Navajo coal reclamation regulatory asset, $12.4 million as of June 30, 2023. The disallowed recovery of 15% of the annual amortization does not have a material impact on APS financial statements.
Pinnacle West sponsors a qualified defined benefit and account balance pension plan, a non-qualified supplemental excess benefit retirement plan, and other postretirement benefit plans for the employees of Pinnacle West and our subsidiaries. The other postretirement benefit plans include a group life and medical plan and a post-65 retiree health reimbursement arrangement (“HRA”). Pinnacle West uses a December 31 measurement date each year for its pension and other postretirement benefit plans. The market-related value of our plan assets is their fair value at the measurement date. The following table provides details of the plans’ net periodic benefit costs and the portion of these costs charged to expense (including administrative costs and excluding amounts capitalized as overhead construction or billed to electric plant participants) (dollars in thousands):
Contributions Pinnacle West has not made any voluntary contributions to our pension plan year-to-date in 2023. The minimum required contributions for the pension plan are zero for the next three years and Pinnacle West does not expect to make any contributions in 2023, 2024 or 2025. With regard to contributions to Pinnacle West's other postretirement benefit plan, Pinnacle West has not made a contribution year-to-date in 2023 and does not expect to make any contributions in 2023, 2024 or 2025.
In 1986, APS entered into agreements with three separate VIE lessor trust entities in order to sell and lease back interests in Palo Verde Unit 2 and related common facilities. APS will retain the assets through 2033 under all three lease agreements. APS will be required to make payments relating to the three leases in total of approximately $21 million annually for the period 2023 through 2033. At the end of the lease period, APS will have the option to purchase the leased assets at their fair market value, extend the leases for up to two years, or return the assets to the lessors. For regulatory reporting purposes, APS accounts for the three leases as operating leases for income statement and cash flow statement purposes, and for balance sheet purposes all three leases are classified as finance leases. See Note 10 for a discussion of leases. APS is exposed to losses relating to these VIEs upon the occurrence of certain events that APS does not consider to be reasonably likely to occur. Under certain circumstances (for example, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) issuing specified violation orders with respect to Palo Verde or the occurrence of specified nuclear events), APS would be required to make specified payments to the VIEs’ noncontrolling equity participants and take title to the leased Unit 2 interests, which, if appropriate, may be required to be written down in value. If such an event were to occur during the lease periods, APS may be required to pay the noncontrolling equity participants approximately $324 million beginning in 2023, and up to $501 million over the lease terms.
Derivative financial instruments are used to manage exposure to commodity price and transportation costs of electricity, natural gas, emissions allowances, and interest rates. Risks associated with market volatility are managed by utilizing various physical and financial derivative instruments, including futures, forwards, options and swaps. As part of our overall risk management program, we may use derivative instruments to hedge purchases and sales of electricity and natural gas. Derivative instruments that meet certain hedge accounting criteria may be designated as cash flow hedges and are used to limit our exposure to cash flow variability on forecasted transactions. The changes in market value of such instruments have a high correlation to price changes in the hedged transactions. Derivative instruments are also entered into for economic hedging purposes. While economic hedges may mitigate exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices, these instruments have not been designated as accounting hedges. Contracts that have the same terms (quantities, delivery points and delivery periods) and for which power does not flow are presented gross, which increases both revenues and fuel and purchased power costs in our Comparative Statements of Income, but does not impact our financial condition, net income or cash flows. Our derivative instruments, excluding those qualifying for a scope exception, are recorded on the balance sheet as an asset or liability and are measured at fair value. See Note 11 for a discussion of fair value measurements. Derivative instruments may qualify for the normal purchases and normal sales scope exception if they require physical delivery and the quantities represent those transacted in the normal course of business. Derivative instruments qualifying for the normal purchases and sales scope exception are accounted for under the accrual method of accounting and excluded from our derivative instrument discussion and disclosures below. APS defers for future rate treatment 100% of the unrealized gains and losses on derivatives pursuant to the PSA mechanism that would otherwise be recognized in income. Realized gains and losses on derivatives are deferred in accordance with the PSA to the extent the amounts are above or below the Base Fuel Rate, see Note 6. Gains and losses from derivatives in the following tables represent the amounts reflected in income before the effect of PSA deferrals. The following table shows the outstanding gross notional volume of derivatives, which represent both purchases and sales (does not reflect net position):
Gains and Losses from Derivative Instruments For the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, APS had no derivative instruments in designated accounting hedging relationships. The following table provides information about gains and losses from derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedging instruments (dollars in thousands):
(a) Amounts are before the effect of PSA deferrals. Derivative Instruments in the Comparative Balance Sheets Our derivative transactions are typically executed under standardized or customized agreements, which include collateral requirements and, in the event of a default, would allow for the netting of positive and negative exposures associated with a single counterparty. Agreements that allow for the offsetting of positive and negative exposures associated with a single counterparty are considered master netting arrangements and are reported gross on the Comparative Balance Sheets. We do not offset a counterparty’s current derivative contracts with the counterparty’s non-current derivative contracts, although our master netting arrangements would allow current and non-current positions to be offset in the event of a default. These types of transactions may include non-derivative instruments, derivatives qualifying for scope exceptions, trade receivables and trade payables arising from settled positions, and other forms of non-cash collateral (such as letters of credit). These types of transactions are excluded from the offsetting tables presented below. The following tables provide information about the fair value of our risk management activities reported on a gross basis and the impacts of offsetting relating to transactions executed under master netting arrangements. While certain amounts may be eligible for offsetting under master netting arrangements, for FERC reporting purposes we do not offset on the balance sheet. These amounts relate to commodity contracts and are located in the assets and liabilities from derivative instrument lines of our Comparative Balance Sheets.
(a)All of our gross recognized derivative instruments were subject to master netting arrangements. (b)No cash collateral has been provided to counterparties, or received from counterparties, that is subject to offsetting. We had total cash collateral received from counterparties of $6,271 thousand.
(a)All of our gross recognized derivative instruments were subject to master netting arrangements. (b)No cash collateral has been provided to counterparties, or received from counterparties, that is subject to offsetting. We had total cash collateral received from counterparties of $5,835 thousand and cash margin provided to counterparties of $28 thousand. Credit Risk and Credit Related Contingent Features We are exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance or nonpayment by counterparties and have risk management contracts with many counterparties. As of June 30, 2023, we have one counterparty for which our exposure represents approximately 23% of $25 million of risk management assets. This exposure relates to a master agreement with the counterparty, and the counterparty is rated as investment grade. Our risk management process assesses and monitors the financial exposure of all counterparties. Despite the fact that the great majority of our trading counterparties’ debt is rated as investment grade by the credit rating agencies, there is still a possibility that one or more of these counterparties could default, resulting in a material impact on earnings for a given period. Counterparties in the portfolio consist principally of financial institutions, major energy companies, municipalities and local distribution companies. We maintain credit policies that we believe minimize overall credit risk to within acceptable limits. Determination of the credit quality of our counterparties is based upon a number of factors, including credit ratings and our evaluation of their financial condition. To manage credit risk, we employ collateral requirements and standardized agreements that allow for the netting of positive and negative exposures associated with a single counterparty. Valuation adjustments are established representing our estimated credit losses on our overall exposure to counterparties. Certain of our derivative instrument contracts contain credit-risk-related contingent features including, among other things, investment grade credit rating provisions, credit-related cross-default provisions, and adequate assurance provisions. Adequate assurance provisions allow a counterparty with reasonable grounds for uncertainty to demand additional collateral based on subjective events and/or conditions. For those derivative instruments in a net liability position, with investment grade credit contingencies, the counterparties could demand additional collateral if our debt credit rating were to fall below investment grade (below BBB- for Standard & Poor’s or Fitch or Baa3 for Moody’s). The following table provides information about our derivative instruments that have credit-risk-related contingent features (dollars in thousands):
(a)This amount is after counterparty netting and includes those contracts which qualify for scope exceptions, which are excluded from the derivative details above. We have energy-related non-derivative instrument contracts with investment grade credit-related contingent features, which could require us to post additional collateral of approximately $161 million if our debt credit ratings were to fall below investment grade.
Palo Verde Generating Station Spent Nuclear Fuel and Waste Disposal On December 19, 2012, APS, acting on behalf of itself and the participant owners of Palo Verde, filed a second breach of contract lawsuit against DOE in the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Court of Federal Claims”). The lawsuit sought to recover damages incurred due to DOE’s breach of the Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High Level Radioactive Waste (“Standard Contract”) for failing to accept Palo Verde’s spent nuclear fuel and high level waste from January 1, 2007, through June 30, 2011, pursuant to the terms of the Standard Contract and the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. On August 18, 2014, APS and DOE entered into a settlement agreement, which required DOE to pay the Palo Verde owners for certain specified costs incurred by Palo Verde during the period January 1, 2007, through June 30, 2011. In addition, the settlement agreement provided APS with a method for submitting claims and getting recovery for costs incurred through December 31, 2016, which was extended to December 31, 2025. APS has submitted eight claims pursuant to the terms of the August 18, 2014 settlement agreement, for eight separate time periods during July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2021. The DOE has approved and paid $123.9 million for these claims (APS’s share is $36.0 million). The amounts recovered were primarily recorded as adjustments to a regulatory liability and had no impact on reported net income. In accordance with the 2017 Rate Case Decision, this regulatory liability is being refunded to customers. See Note 6. On October 31, 2022, APS filed its ninth claim pursuant to the terms of the August 18, 2014 settlement agreement. On March 16, 2023, the DOE approved a payment in the amount of $14.3 million (APS’s share is $4.2 million), and on April 6, 2023, APS received this payment. Nuclear Insurance Public liability for incidents at nuclear power plants is governed by the Price-Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act (“Price-Anderson Act”), which limits the liability of nuclear reactor owners to the amount of insurance available from both commercial sources and an industry-wide retrospective payment plan. In accordance with the Price-Anderson Act, the Palo Verde participants are insured against public liability for a nuclear incident up to approximately $13.7 billion per occurrence. Palo Verde maintains the maximum available nuclear liability insurance in the amount of $450 million, which is provided by American Nuclear Insurers. The remaining balance of approximately $13.2 billion of liability coverage is provided through a mandatory, industry-wide retrospective premium program. If losses at any nuclear power plant covered by the program exceed the accumulated funds, APS could be responsible for retrospective premiums. The maximum retrospective premium per reactor under the program for each nuclear liability incident is approximately $137.6 million, subject to a maximum annual premium of approximately $20.5 million per incident. Based on APS’s ownership interest in the three Palo Verde units, APS’s maximum retrospective premium per incident for all three units is approximately $120.1 million, with a maximum annual retrospective premium of approximately $17.9 million. The Palo Verde participants maintain insurance for property damage to, and decontamination of, property at Palo Verde in the aggregate amount of $2.8 billion. APS has also secured accidental outage insurance for a sudden and unforeseen accidental outage of any of the three units. The property damage, decontamination, and accidental outage insurance are provided by Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (“NEIL”). APS is subject to retrospective premium adjustments under all NEIL policies if NEIL’s losses in any policy year exceed accumulated funds. The maximum amount APS could incur under the current NEIL policies totals approximately $22.4 million for each retrospective premium assessment declared by NEIL’s Board of Directors due to losses. Additionally, at the sole discretion of the NEIL Board of Directors, APS would be liable to provide approximately $62.6 million in deposit premium within 20 days of request as assurance to satisfy any site obligation of retrospective premium assessment. The insurance coverage discussed in this, and the previous paragraph is subject to certain policy conditions, sublimits, and exclusions. Contractual Obligations As of June 30, 2023, our fuel and purchased power and purchase obligation commitments have increased by $5.5 billion from the information provided in our 2022 FERC Form 1. The change is primarily due to new purchased power and energy storage commitments and also includes a $505 million reduction of commitments due to the termination of an energy storage purchased power contract for a project that was not developed. The majority of the changes relate to 2025 and thereafter. This amount includes approximately $4.3 billion of commitments relating to purchased power lease contracts. See Note 14. Other than the items described above, there have been no material changes, as of June 30, 2023, outside the normal course of business in contractual obligations from the information provided in our 2022 FERC Form 1. See Note 5 for discussion regarding changes in our short-term and long-term debt obligations. Superfund and Other Related Matters The Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (“Superfund” or “CERCLA”) establishes liability for the cleanup of hazardous substances found contaminating the soil, water or air. Those who released, generated, transported to or disposed of hazardous substances at a contaminated site are among the parties who are potentially responsible (each a “PRP”). PRPs may be strictly, jointly, and severally liable for clean-up. On September 3, 2003, EPA advised APS that EPA considers APS to be a PRP in the Motorola 52nd Street Superfund Site, Operable Unit 3 (“OU3”) in Phoenix, Arizona. APS has facilities that are within this Superfund site. APS has agreed with EPA to perform certain investigative activities of the APS facilities within OU3. In addition, on September 23, 2009, APS agreed with EPA and one other PRP to voluntarily assist with the funding and management of the site-wide groundwater remedial investigation and feasibility study (“RI/FS”). The RI/FS for OU3 was finalized and submitted to EPA at the end of 2022. APS cannot predict the EPA’s timing with respect to this matter. APS’s estimated costs related to this investigation and study is approximately $3 million. APS anticipates incurring additional expenditures in the future, but because the ultimate remediation requirements are not yet finalized by EPA, at the present time expenditures related to this matter cannot be reasonably estimated. On August 6, 2013, the Roosevelt Irrigation District (“RID”) filed a lawsuit in Arizona District Court against APS and 24 other defendants, alleging that RID’s groundwater wells were contaminated by the release of hazardous substances from facilities owned or operated by the defendants. The lawsuit also alleges that, under Superfund laws, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to RID. The allegations against APS arise out of APS’s current and former ownership of facilities in and around OU3. As part of a state governmental investigation into groundwater contamination in this area, on January 25, 2015, the ADEQ sent a letter to APS seeking information concerning the degree to which, if any, APS’s current and former ownership of these facilities may have contributed to groundwater contamination in this area. APS responded to ADEQ on May 4, 2015. On December 16, 2016, two RID environmental and engineering contractors filed an ancillary lawsuit for recovery of costs against APS and the other defendants in the RID litigation. That same day, another RID service provider filed an additional ancillary CERCLA lawsuit against certain of the defendants in the main RID litigation but excluded APS and certain other parties as named defendants. Because the ancillary lawsuits concern past costs allegedly incurred by these RID vendors, which were ruled unrecoverable directly by RID in November of 2016, the additional lawsuits do not increase APS’s exposure or risk related to these matters. On April 5, 2018, RID and the defendants in that particular litigation executed a settlement agreement, fully resolving RID’s CERCLA claims concerning both past and future cost recovery. APS’s share of this settlement was immaterial. In addition, the two environmental and engineering vendors voluntarily dismissed their lawsuit against APS and the other named defendants without prejudice. An order to this effect was entered on April 17, 2018. With this disposition of the case, the vendors may file their lawsuit again in the future. On August 16, 2019, Maricopa County, one of the three direct defendants in the service provider lawsuit, filed a third-party complaint seeking contribution for its liability, if any, from APS and 28 other third-party defendants. On September 30, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona granted partial summary judgment to the direct defendants for $20.7 million of the approximately $21.2 million in CERCLA response costs claimed by the service provider. Based on the court’s denial of the service provider’s motion for reconsideration, the service provider filed a motion for entry of judgment on June 12, 2023, and waived its rights to recover the remaining approximately $500,000 in claimed response costs, for the stated purpose of appealing the September 2022 summary judgment order to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. We are unable to predict the outcome of any further litigation related to the claim for $20.7 million in response costs; however, we do not expect the outcome to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. On February 28, 2022, EPA provided APS with a request for information under CERCLA related to APS’s Ocotillo power plant site located in Tempe, Arizona. In particular, EPA seeks information from APS regarding APS’s use, storage, and disposal of substances containing per-and polyfluoroalkyl (“PFAS”) compounds at the Ocotillo power plant site in order to aid EPA’s investigation into actual or threatened releases of PFAS into groundwater within the South Indian Bend Wash (“SIBW”) Superfund site. The SIBW Superfund site includes the APS Ocotillo power plant site. APS filed its response to this information request on April 29, 2022. On January 17, 2023, EPA contacted APS to inform the Company that it would be commencing on-site investigations within the SIBW site, including the Ocotillo power plant, and performing a remedial investigation and feasibility study related to potential PFAS impacts to groundwater over the next two to three years. APS estimates that its costs to oversee and participate in the remedial investigation work will be approximately $1.7 million. At the present time, we are unable to predict the outcome of this matter and any further expenditures related to necessary remediation, if any, or further investigations cannot be reasonably estimated. Four Corners SCR Cost Recovery As part of APS’s 2019 Rate Case, APS included recovery of the deferral and rate base effects of the Four Corners SCR project. On November 2, 2021, the 2019 Rate Case decision was approved by the ACC allowing approximately $194 million of SCR related plant investments and cost deferrals in rate base and to recover, depreciate and amortize in rates based on an end-of-life assumption of July 2031. The decision also included a partial and combined disallowance of $215.5 million on the SCR investments and deferrals. APS believes the SCR plant investments and related SCR cost deferrals were prudently incurred, and on December 17, 2021, APS filed its Notice of Direct Appeal at the Arizona Court of Appeals requesting review of the $215.5 million disallowance. The Arizona Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on November 30, 2022. On March 6, 2023, the Court of Appeals issued its order in the matter, vacating the ACC’s disallowance of the SCR investment and remanding the matter back to the ACC for further review in accordance with ACC rules and the order of the Court of Appeals. On June 21, 2023, the ACC approved a joint settlement filed by APS and the ACC’s Legal Division that resolved all issues relating to the 2019 Rate Case decision, including recovery of the cost of the Four Corners SCRs. See Note 6 for additional information regarding the Four Corners SCR cost recovery and the 2019 Rate Case. Environmental Matters APS is subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations affecting many aspects of its present and future operations, including air emissions of both conventional pollutants and greenhouse gases, water quality, wastewater discharges, solid waste, hazardous waste, and coal combustion residuals (“CCRs”). These laws and regulations can change from time to time, imposing new obligations on APS resulting in increased capital, operating, and other costs. Associated capital expenditures or operating costs could be material. APS intends to seek recovery of any such environmental compliance costs through our rates but cannot predict whether it will obtain such recovery. The following proposed and final rules involve material compliance costs to APS. Coal Combustion Waste. On December 19, 2014, EPA issued its final regulations governing the handling and disposal of CCR, such as fly ash and bottom ash. The rule regulates CCR as a non-hazardous waste under Subtitle D of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and establishes national minimum criteria for existing and new CCR landfills and surface impoundments and all lateral expansions. These criteria include standards governing location restrictions, design and operating criteria, groundwater monitoring and corrective action, closure requirements and post closure care, and recordkeeping, notification, and internet posting requirements. The rule generally requires any existing unlined CCR surface impoundment to stop receiving CCR and either retrofit or close, and further requires the closure of any CCR landfill or surface impoundment that cannot meet the applicable performance criteria for location restrictions or structural integrity. Such closure requirements are deemed “forced closure” or “closure for cause” of unlined surface impoundments and are the subject of the regulatory and judicial activities described below. Since these regulations were finalized, EPA has taken steps to substantially modify the federal rules governing CCR disposal. While certain changes have been prompted by utility industry petitions, others have resulted from judicial review, court-approved settlements with environmental groups, and statutory changes to RCRA. The following lists the pending regulatory changes that, if finalized, could have a material impact as to how APS manages CCR at its coal-fired power plants: •Following the passage of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act in 2016, EPA possesses authority to either authorize states to develop their own permit programs for CCR management or issue federal permits governing CCR disposal both in states without their own permit programs and on tribal lands. Although ADEQ has taken steps to develop a CCR permitting program, and new state legislation has been adopted providing ADEQ with appropriate permitting authority for CCR under the state solid waste management program, it is not clear when that program will be put into effect. On December 19, 2019, EPA proposed its own set of regulations governing the issuance of CCR management permits, which would impact facilities like Four Corners located on the Navajo Nation. The proposal remains pending. •On March 1, 2018, as a result of a settlement with certain environmental groups, EPA proposed adding boron to the list of constituents that trigger corrective action requirements to remediate groundwater impacted by CCR disposal activities. Apart from a subsequent proposal issued on August 14, 2019, to add a specific, health-based groundwater protection standard for boron, EPA has yet to take action on this proposal. •With respect to APS’s Cholla facility, APS’s application for alternative closure was submitted to EPA on November 30, 2020. While EPA has deemed APS’s application administratively “complete,” the Agency’s approval remains pending. If granted, this application would allow the continued disposal of CCR within Cholla’s existing unlined CCR surface impoundments until the required date for ceasing coal-fired boiler operations in April 2025. This application will be subject to public comment and, potentially, judicial review. We expect to have a proposed decision from EPA regarding Cholla sometime in 2023. •On May 18, 2023, EPA published a proposal that expands the scope of federal CCR regulations to address the impacts from historical CCR disposal activities that would have ceased prior to 2015. EPA proposes to define a new class of CCR management units (“CCRMUs”) that broadly encompass any location at an operating coal-fired power plant where CCR would have been placed on land. As proposed, this would include not only historically closed landfills and surface impoundments but also prior applications of CCR beneficial use. EPA expects to finalize this proposal by spring of 2024. We cannot at this time predict the outcome of these regulatory proceedings or when EPA will take final action on those matters that are still pending. Depending on the eventual outcome, the costs associated with APS’s management of CCR could materially increase, which could affect APS’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. APS currently disposes of CCR in ash ponds and dry storage areas at Cholla and Four Corners. APS estimates that its share of incremental costs to comply with the CCR rule for Four Corners is approximately $30 million and its share of incremental costs to comply with the CCR rule for Cholla is approximately $19 million. The Navajo Plant disposed of CCR only in a dry landfill storage area. To comply with the CCR rule for the Navajo Plant, APS’s share of incremental costs was approximately $1 million, which has been incurred. Additionally, the CCR rule requires ongoing, phased groundwater monitoring. As of October 2018, APS has completed the statistical analyses for its CCR disposal units that triggered assessment monitoring. APS determined that several of its CCR disposal units at Cholla and Four Corners will need to undergo corrective action. In addition, under the current regulations, all such disposal units must have ceased operating and initiated closure by April 11, 2021, at the latest (except for those disposal units subject to alternative closure). APS completed the assessments of corrective measures on June 14, 2019; however, additional investigations and engineering analyses that will support the remedy selection are still underway. In addition, APS will also solicit input from the public and host public hearings as part of this process. Based on the work performed to date, APS currently estimates that its share of corrective action and monitoring costs at Four Corners will likely range from $10 million to $15 million, which would be incurred over 30 years. As to Cholla, APS currently estimates that its share of corrective action and monitoring costs at this facility will likely range from $35 million to $40 million, which similarly would be incurred over 30 years. As APS continues to implement the CCR rule’s corrective action assessment process, the current cost estimates may change. Given uncertainties that may exist until we have fully completed the corrective action assessment and final remedy selection process, APS cannot predict any ultimate impacts to APS; however, at this time APS does not believe that any potential changes to the cost estimate for Four Corners or Cholla would have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. EPA Power Plant Carbon Regulations. EPA’s regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from electric utility power plants has proceeded in fits and starts over most of the last decade. Starting on August 3, 2015, EPA finalized the Clean Power Plan, which was the Agency’s first effort at such regulation through system-wide generation dispatch shifting. Those regulations were subsequently repealed by the EPA on June 19, 2019 and replaced by the Affordable Clean Energy (“ACE”) regulations, which were a far narrower set of rules. While the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit subsequently vacated the ACE regulations on January 19, 2021, and ordered a remand for EPA to develop replacement regulations consistent with the original 2015 Clean Power Plan, the U.S. Supreme Court subsequently reversed that decision on June 30, 2022, holding that the Clean Power Plan exceeded EPA’s authority under the Clean Air Act. In the latest set of proposed rules, released on May 23, 2023, EPA contemplates emission standards and guidelines for various subcategories of new and existing power plants. Unlike EPA’s Clean Power Plan regulations from 2015, which took a broad, system-wide approach to regulating carbon emissions from electric utility fossil-fuel burning power plants, the most recent proposal is limited to measures that can be installed at individual power plants to limit planet-warming emissions. As such, for new natural gas-fired combustion turbine power plants, EPA is proposing that carbon emission performance standards apply based on the annual capacity factors. For the highest utilization combustion turbines, EPA is therefore proposing that such facilities be retrofitted for carbon capture and sequestration or utilization controls (“CCS”) or varying levels of hydrogen gas (“H2”) co-firing. As for existing natural gas-fired combustion turbines, EPA is imposing similar control requirements at large, high utilization generating units, but is otherwise not proceeding at this time with further regulation. As such, under EPA’s proposal, this means that both new and existing peaking gas-fired combustion turbines (i.e., those with a 20% or less annual capacity factor) are effectively unregulated under the proposed regulations. For coal-fired power plants, instead of imposing regulations based on capacity and utilization, EPA has developed subcategories based on planned retirement dates. This means that facilities retiring between 2030 and before 2040 must meet increasingly stringent emission limits up to natural-gas co-firing starting in 2030. However, for those facilities with no planned retirement date prior to 2040, EPA is requiring those plants to be retrofitted with CCS controls by 2030. EPA expects to take final action on this proposal by spring or summer of 2024. At this time, APS cannot predict the outcome of this rulemaking or when EPA will take final action. In addition, APS is continuing to evaluate this proposal and its potential impact on APS’s operations. Depending on the eventual outcome, the costs associated with APS’s operation of its current and future thermal power plants could materially increase, which could affect APS’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Other environmental rules that could involve material compliance costs include those related to effluent limitations, the ozone national ambient air quality standard and other rules or matters involving the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, RCRA, Superfund, the Navajo Nation, and water supplies for our power plants. The financial impact of complying with current and future environmental rules could jeopardize the economic viability of APS’s fossil-fuel powered plants or the willingness or ability of power plant participants to fund any required equipment upgrades or continue their participation in these plants. The economics of continuing to own certain resources, particularly our coal plants, may deteriorate, warranting early retirement of those plants, which may result in asset impairments. APS would seek recovery in rates for the book value of any remaining investments in the plants, as well as other costs related to early retirement, but cannot predict whether it would obtain such recovery. Four Corners National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) Permit The latest NPDES permit for Four Corners was issued on September 30, 2019. Based upon a November 1, 2019, filing by several environmental groups, the Environmental Appeals Board (“EAB”) took up review of the Four Corners NPDES Permit. The EAB denied the environmental group petition on September 30, 2020. While on January 22, 2021, the environmental groups filed a petition for review of the EAB’s decision with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the parties to the litigation (including APS) finalized a settlement on May 2, 2022. This settlement requires investigation of thermal wastewater discharges from Four Corners, administratively closes the litigation filed in January of 2021, and is not expected to have a material impact on APS’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Financial Assurances In the normal course of business, we obtain standby letters of credit and surety bonds from financial institutions and other third parties. These instruments guarantee our own future performance and provide third parties with financial and performance assurance in the event we do not perform. These instruments support commodity contract collateral obligations and other transactions. As of June 30, 2023, standby letters of credit totaled approximately $0.2 million and will expire in 2023 and 2024. As of June 30, 2023, surety bonds expiring through 2025 totaled approximately $15 million. The underlying liabilities insured by these instruments are reflected on our balance sheets, where applicable. Therefore, no additional liability is reflected for the letters of credit and surety bonds themselves. We enter into agreements that include indemnification provisions relating to liabilities arising from or related to certain of our agreements. Most significantly, APS has agreed to indemnify the equity participants and other parties in the Palo Verde sale leaseback transactions with respect to certain tax matters. Generally, a maximum obligation is not explicitly stated in the indemnification provisions and, therefore, the overall maximum amount of the obligation under such indemnification provisions cannot be reasonably estimated. Based on historical experience and evaluation of the specific indemnities, we do not believe that any material loss related to such indemnification provisions is likely.
We classify our assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value within the fair value hierarchy. This hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the inputs used to determine fair values, which are then classified and disclosed in one of three categories. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are: Level 1 — Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date Level 2 — Other significant observable inputs, including quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable (such as yield curves). Level 3 — Valuation models with significant unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity. Instruments in this category may include long-dated derivative transactions where valuations are unobservable due to the length of the transaction, options, and transactions in locations where observable market data does not exist. The valuation models we employ utilize spot prices, forward prices, historical market data and other factors to forecast future prices. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Thus, a valuation may be classified in Level 3 even though the valuation may include significant inputs that are readily observable. We maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. We rely primarily on the market approach of using prices and other market information for identical and/or comparable assets and liabilities. If market data is not readily available, inputs may reflect our own assumptions about the inputs market participants would use. Our assessment of the inputs and the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities as well as their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. We assess whether a market is active by obtaining observable broker quotes, reviewing actual market activity, and assessing the volume of transactions. We consider broker quotes observable inputs when the quote is binding on the broker, we can validate the quote with market activity, or we can determine that the inputs the broker used to arrive at the quoted price are observable. Certain instruments have been valued using the concept of Net Asset Value (“NAV”) as a practical expedient. These instruments are typically structured as investment companies offering shares or units to multiple investors for the purpose of providing a return. These instruments are similar to mutual funds; however, their NAV is generally not published and publicly available, nor are these instruments traded on an exchange. Instruments valued using NAV as a practical expedient are included in our fair value disclosures; however, in accordance with GAAP are not classified within the fair value hierarchy levels. Recurring Fair Value Measurements We apply recurring fair value measurements to cash equivalents, derivative instruments, and investments held in the nuclear decommissioning trusts and other special use funds. On an annual basis, we apply fair value measurements to plan assets held in our retirement and other benefit plans. See Note 8 in the 2022 FERC Form 1 for fair value discussion of plan assets held in our retirement and other benefit plans. Cash Equivalents Cash equivalents represent certain investments in money market funds that are valued using quoted prices in active markets. Risk Management Activities — Energy Derivative Instruments Exchange traded commodity contracts are valued using unadjusted quoted prices. For non-exchange traded commodity contracts, we calculate fair value based on the average of the bid and offer price, discounted to reflect net present value. We maintain certain valuation adjustments for a number of risks associated with the valuation of future commitments. These include valuation adjustments for liquidity and credit risks. The liquidity valuation adjustment represents the cost that would be incurred if all unmatched positions were closed out or hedged. The credit valuation adjustment represents estimated credit losses on our net exposure to counterparties, taking into account netting agreements, expected default experience for the credit rating of the counterparties and the overall diversification of the portfolio. We maintain credit policies that management believes minimize overall credit risk. Certain non-exchange traded commodity contracts are valued based on unobservable inputs due to the long-term nature of contracts, characteristics of the product, or the unique location of the transactions. Our long-dated energy transactions consist of observable valuations for the near-term portion and unobservable valuations for the long-term portions of the transaction. We rely primarily on broker quotes to value these instruments. When our valuations utilize broker quotes, we perform various control procedures to ensure the quote has been developed consistent with fair value accounting guidance. These controls include assessing the quote for reasonableness by comparison against other broker quotes, reviewing historical price relationships, and assessing market activity. When broker quotes are not available, the primary valuation technique used to calculate the fair value is the extrapolation of forward pricing curves using observable market data for more liquid delivery points in the same region and actual transactions at more illiquid delivery points. When the unobservable portion is significant to the overall valuation of the transaction, the entire transaction is classified as Level 3. Investments Held in Nuclear Decommissioning Trusts and Other Special Use Funds The nuclear decommissioning trusts and other special use funds invest in fixed income and equity securities. Other special use funds include the coal reclamation escrow account and the active union employee medical account. See Note 12 for additional discussion about our investment accounts. We value investments in fixed income and equity securities using information provided by our trustees and escrow agent. Our trustees and escrow agent use pricing services that utilize the valuation methodologies described below to determine fair market value. We have internal control procedures designed to ensure this information is consistent with fair value accounting guidance. These procedures include assessing valuations using an independent pricing source, verifying that pricing can be supported by actual recent market transactions, assessing hierarchy classifications, comparing investment returns with benchmarks, and obtaining and reviewing independent audit reports on the trustees’ and escrow agent’s internal operating controls and valuation processes. Fixed Income Securities Fixed income securities issued by the U.S. Treasury are valued using quoted active market prices and are typically classified as Level 1. Fixed income securities issued by corporations, municipalities, and other agencies, including mortgage-backed instruments, are valued using quoted inactive market prices, quoted active market prices for similar securities, or by utilizing calculations which incorporate observable inputs such as yield curves and spreads relative to such yield curves. These fixed income instruments are classified as Level 2. Whenever possible, multiple market quotes are obtained which enables a cross-check validation. A primary price source is identified based on asset type, class, or issue of securities. Fixed income securities may also include short-term investments in certificates of deposit, variable rate notes, time deposit accounts, U.S. Treasury and Agency obligations, U.S. Treasury repurchase agreements, commercial paper, and other short-term instruments. These instruments are valued using active market prices or utilizing observable inputs described above. Equity Securities The nuclear decommissioning trusts’ equity security investments are held indirectly through commingled funds. The commingled funds are valued using the funds’ NAV as a practical expedient. The funds’ NAV is primarily derived from the quoted active market prices of the underlying equity securities held by the funds. We may transact in these commingled funds on a semi-monthly basis at the NAV. The commingled funds are maintained by a bank and hold investments in accordance with the stated objective of tracking the performance of the S&P 500 Index. Because the commingled funds’ shares are offered to a limited group of investors, they are not considered to be traded in an active market. As these instruments are valued using NAV, as a practical expedient, they have not been classified within the fair value hierarchy. The nuclear decommissioning trusts and other special use funds may also hold equity securities that include exchange traded mutual funds and money market accounts for short-term liquidity purposes. These short-term, highly-liquid investments are valued using active market prices. Fair Value Tables The following table presents the fair value at June 30, 2023, of our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis (dollars in thousands):
(a)Represents net pending securities sales and purchases. (b)Valued using NAV as a practical expedient and, therefore, are not classified in the fair value hierarchy. The following table presents the fair value at December 31, 2022, of our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis (dollars in thousands):
(a)Represents net pending securities sales and purchases. (b)Valued using NAV as a practical expedient and, therefore, are not classified in the fair value hierarchy. Fair Value Measurements Classified as Level 3 The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of our energy derivative contracts include broker quotes that cannot be validated as an observable input primarily due to the long-term nature of the quote or other characteristics of the product. Significant changes in these inputs in isolation would result in significantly higher or lower fair value measurements. Changes in our derivative contract fair values, including changes relating to unobservable inputs, typically will not impact net income due to regulatory accounting treatment. See Note 6. Because our forward commodity contracts classified as Level 3 are currently in a net purchase position, we would expect price increases of the underlying commodity to result in increases in the net fair value of the related contracts. Conversely, if the price of the underlying commodity decreases, the net fair value of the related contracts would likely decrease. Other unobservable valuation inputs include credit and liquidity reserves which do not have a material impact on our valuations; however, significant changes in these inputs could also result in higher or lower fair value measurements. The following tables provide information regarding our significant unobservable inputs used to value our risk management derivative Level 3 instruments at June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
(a)Includes swaps and physical and financial contracts. (b)Unobservable inputs were weighted by the relative fair value of the instrument.
(a)Includes swaps and physical and financial contracts. (b)Unobservable inputs were weighted by the relative fair value of the instrument. The following table shows the changes in fair value for our risk management activities’ assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs (dollars in thousands):
Transfers in or out of Level 3 are typically related to our long dated energy transactions that extend beyond available quoted periods. Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value The carrying value of our short-term borrowings approximate fair value and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 5 for our long-term debt fair values.
We have investments in debt and equity securities held in Nuclear Decommissioning Trusts, Coal Reclamation Escrow Account, and an Active Union Employee Medical Account. Investments in debt securities are classified as available-for-sale securities. We record both debt and equity security investments at their fair value on our Comparative Balance Sheets. See Note 11 for a discussion of how fair value is determined and the classification of the investments within the fair value hierarchy. The investments in each trust or account are restricted for use and are intended to fund specified costs and activities as further described for each fund below. Nuclear Decommissioning Trusts — APS established external decommissioning trusts in accordance with NRC regulations to fund the future costs APS expects to incur to decommission Palo Verde. Third-party investment managers are authorized to buy and sell securities per stated investment guidelines. The trust funds are invested in fixed income securities and equity securities. Earnings and proceeds from sales and maturities of securities are reinvested in the trusts. Because of the ability of APS to recover decommissioning costs in rates, and in accordance with the regulatory treatment, APS has deferred realized and unrealized gains and losses (including credit losses) in other regulatory liabilities. Coal Reclamation Escrow Account — APS has investments restricted for the future coal mine reclamation funding related to Four Corners. This escrow account is primarily invested in fixed income securities. Earnings and proceeds from sales of securities are reinvested in the escrow account. Because of the ability of APS to recover coal reclamation costs in rates, and in accordance with the regulatory treatment, APS has deferred realized and unrealized gains and losses (including credit losses) in other regulatory liabilities. Activities relating to APS coal mine reclamation escrow account investments are included within the other special use funds in the table below. Active Union Employee Medical Account — APS has investments restricted for paying active union employee medical costs. These investments may be used to pay active union employee medical costs incurred in the current and future periods. In 2022, APS was reimbursed $15 million for prior year active union employee medical claims from the active union employee medical account. The account is invested primarily in fixed income securities. In accordance with the ratemaking treatment, APS has deferred the unrealized gains and losses (including credit losses) in other regulatory liabilities. Activities relating to active union employee medical account investments are included within the other special use funds in the table below. APS The following tables present the unrealized gains and losses based on the original cost of the investment and summarizes the fair value of APS’s nuclear decommissioning trusts and other special use fund assets (dollars in thousands):
(a)As of June 30, 2023, the amortized cost basis of these available-for-sale investments is $1,028 million. (b) Represents net pending securities sales and purchases.
(a)As of December 31, 2022, the amortized cost basis of these available-for-sale investments is $927 million. (b)Represents net pending securities sales and purchases. The following table sets forth APS’s realized gains and losses relating to the sale and maturity of available-for-sale debt securities and equity securities, and the proceeds from the sale and maturity of these investment securities (dollars in thousands):
(a) Proceeds are reinvested in the nuclear decommissioning trusts and other special use funds, excluding amounts reimbursed to the Company for active union employee medical claims from the active union employee medical account.
(a) Proceeds are reinvested in the nuclear decommissioning trusts and other special use funds, excluding amounts reimbursed to the Company for active union employee medical claims from the active union employee medical account. Fixed Income Securities Contractual Maturities The fair value of APS’s fixed income securities, summarized by contractual maturities, at June 30, 2023, is as follows (dollars in thousands):
The following tables show the changes in APS’s accumulated other comprehensive loss, including reclassification adjustments, net of tax, by component (dollars in thousands):
(a)These amounts primarily represent amortization of actuarial loss and are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. See Note 7.
We lease certain land, buildings, vehicles, equipment, and other property through rental agreements with varying terms, provisions, and expiration dates. APS also has certain purchased power agreements and energy storage agreements that qualify as lease arrangements. Our leases have remaining terms that expire in 2023 through 2073. In 1986, APS entered into agreements with three separate lessor trust entities in order to sell and lease back interests in Palo Verde Unit 2 and related common facilities. See Note 8. For regulatory reporting purposes, APS accounts for the three Palo Verde Unit 2 leases as operating leases for income statement and cash flow statement purposes, and for balance sheet purposes they are classified as finance leases. APS has purchased power lease agreements that allow APS the right to the generation capacity from certain natural-gas fueled generators during certain months of each year throughout the term of the arrangements. As APS only has rights to use the assets during certain periods of each year the leases have non-consecutive periods of use. APS does not operate or maintain these leased assets. APS controls the dispatch of these leased assets and is required to pay fixed monthly capacity payments during the periods of use. For these types of leased assets APS has elected to combine both the lease and non-lease payment components and accounts for the entire fixed payment as a lease obligation. These purchased power lease contracts are accounted for as operating leases. The contracts do not contain purchase options or term extension options. In addition to the fixed monthly capacity payment, APS must also pay variable charges based on the actual production volume of the asset. The variable consideration is not included in the measurement of our lease obligation. In January 2023, APS modified two existing purchase power operating lease agreements. Among other changes, the modifications extend the expiration dates of these contracts from October 2027 to October 2032 for one of the leases, and from September 2026 to October 2034 for the other lease. These agreements previously commenced in 2020 and 2021. The following tables provide information related to our lease costs (dollars in thousands):
(a)Primarily relates to purchased power lease contracts. (b)For regulatory purposes the costs relating to these finance leases are reported as a component of operating expense. Lease costs are primarily included as a component of operating expenses on our Comparative Statements of Income. Lease costs relating to purchased power lease contracts are recorded in fuel and purchased power on the Comparative Statements of Income and are subject to recovery under the PSA or RES (see Note 6). The tables above reflect the lease cost amounts before the effect of regulatory deferral under the PSA and RES. Variable lease costs are recognized in the period the costs are incurred, and primarily relate to renewable purchased power lease contracts. Payments under most renewable purchased power lease contracts are dependent upon environmental factors, and due to the inherent uncertainty associated with the reliability of the fuel source, the payments are considered variable and are excluded from the measurement of lease liabilities and right-of-use lease assets. Certain of our lease agreements have lease terms with non-consecutive periods of use. For these agreements we recognize lease costs during the periods of use. Leases with initial terms of 12 months or less are considered short-term leases and are not recorded on the balance sheet. The following table provides information related to the maturity of our lease liabilities (dollars in thousands):
We recognize lease assets and liabilities upon lease commencement. At June 30, 2023, we have various lease arrangements that have been executed, but have not yet commenced. These arrangements primarily relate to energy storage assets. The lease commencement dates for these agreements have experienced delays. APS continues to work with the lessors to determine revised commencement dates. We expect lease commencements dates ranging from August 2023 through June 2025, with lease terms expiring through May 2045. We expect the total fixed consideration paid for these arrangements, which includes both lease and non-lease payments, will approximate $6.3 billion over the terms of the agreements. The following tables provide other additional information related to lease liabilities (dollars in thousands):
(a)Primarily relates to the two purchased power operating lease agreements that were modified in January 2023. (b)Most of our lease agreements do not contain an implicit rate that is readily determinable. For these agreements we use our incremental borrowing rate to measure the present value of lease liabilities. We determine our incremental borrowing rate at lease commencement based on the rate of interest that we would have to pay to borrow, on a collateralized basis over a similar term, an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. We use the implicit rate when it is readily determinable.
During the six months ended June 30, 2023, the Company revised its cost estimates for existing Asset Retirement Obligations ("ARO") at Cholla related to the closure of ponds and facilities, which resulted in an increase to the ARO of approximately $36 million. Additionally, an updated Four Corners coal-fired power plant decommissioning estimate was updated, which resulted in a decrease of approximately $13 million. See additional details in Notes 6 and 10. The following schedule shows the change in our asset retirement obligations for the six months ended June 30, 2023 (dollars in thousands):
In accordance with regulatory accounting, APS accrues removal costs for its regulated utility assets, even if there is no legal obligation for removal. See detail of regulatory liabilities in Note 6. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
STATEMENTS OF ACCUMULATED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Line No. |
Item (a) |
Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available-For-Sale Securities (b) |
Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment (net amount) (c) |
Foreign Currency Hedges (d) |
Other Adjustments (e) |
Other Cash Flow Hedges Interest Rate Swaps (f) |
Other Cash Flow Hedges [Specify] (g) |
Totals for each category of items recorded in Account 219 (h) |
Net Income (Carried Forward from Page 116, Line 78) (i) |
Total Comprehensive Income (j) |
1 | Balance of Account 219 at Beginning of Preceding Year |
|||||||||
2 | Preceding Quarter/Year to Date Reclassifications from Account 219 to Net Income |
|||||||||
3 | Preceding Quarter/Year to Date Changes in Fair Value |
|||||||||
4 | Total (lines 2 and 3) |
|||||||||
5 | Balance of Account 219 at End of Preceding Quarter/Year |
|||||||||
6 | Balance of Account 219 at Beginning of Current Year |
|||||||||
7 | Current Quarter/Year to Date Reclassifications from Account 219 to Net Income |
|||||||||
8 | Current Quarter/Year to Date Changes in Fair Value |
|||||||||
9 | Total (lines 7 and 8) |
|||||||||
10 | Balance of Account 219 at End of Current Quarter/Year |
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
SUMMARY OF UTILITY PLANT AND ACCUMULATED PROVISIONS FOR DEPRECIATION. AMORTIZATION AND DEPLETION |
||||||||
Report in Column (c) the amount for electric function, in column (d) the amount for gas function, in column (e), (f), and (g) report other (specify) and in column (h) common function. |
||||||||
Line No. |
Classification (a) |
Total Company For the Current Year/Quarter Ended (b) |
Electric (c) |
Gas (d) |
Other (Specify) (e) |
Other (Specify) (f) |
Other (Specify) (g) |
Common (h) |
1 |
UtilityPlantAbstract UTILITY PLANT |
|||||||
2 |
UtilityPlantInServiceAbstract In Service |
|||||||
3 |
UtilityPlantInServiceClassified Plant in Service (Classified) |
|
|
|||||
4 |
UtilityPlantInServicePropertyUnderCapitalLeases Property Under Capital Leases |
|
|
|||||
5 |
UtilityPlantInServicePlantPurchasedOrSold Plant Purchased or Sold |
|||||||
6 |
UtilityPlantInServiceCompletedConstructionNotClassified Completed Construction not Classified |
|
|
|||||
7 |
UtilityPlantInServiceExperimentalPlantUnclassified Experimental Plant Unclassified |
|||||||
8 |
UtilityPlantInServiceClassifiedAndUnclassified Total (3 thru 7) |
|
|
|||||
9 |
UtilityPlantLeasedToOthers Leased to Others |
|||||||
10 |
UtilityPlantHeldForFutureUse Held for Future Use |
|
|
|||||
11 |
ConstructionWorkInProgress Construction Work in Progress |
|
|
|||||
12 |
UtilityPlantAcquisitionAdjustment Acquisition Adjustments |
|
|
|||||
13 |
UtilityPlantAndConstructionWorkInProgress Total Utility Plant (8 thru 12) |
|
|
|||||
14 |
AccumulatedProvisionForDepreciationAmortizationAndDepletionOfPlantUtility Accumulated Provisions for Depreciation, Amortization, & Depletion |
|
|
|||||
15 |
UtilityPlantNet Net Utility Plant (13 less 14) |
|
|
|||||
16 |
DetailOfAccumulatedProvisionsForDepreciationAmortizationAndDepletionAbstract DETAIL OF ACCUMULATED PROVISIONS FOR DEPRECIATION, AMORTIZATION AND DEPLETION |
|||||||
17 |
AccumulatedProvisionForDepreciationAmortizationAndDepletionUtilityPlantInServiceAbstract In Service: |
|||||||
18 |
DepreciationUtilityPlantInService Depreciation |
|
|
|||||
19 |
AmortizationAndDepletionOfProducingNaturalGasLandAndLandRightsutilityPlantInService Amortization and Depletion of Producing Natural Gas Land and Land Rights |
|||||||
20 |
AmortizationOfUndergroundStorageLandAndLandRightsutilityPlantInService Amortization of Underground Storage Land and Land Rights |
|||||||
21 |
AmortizationOfOtherUtilityPlantUtilityPlantInService Amortization of Other Utility Plant |
|
|
|||||
22 |
DepreciationAmortizationAndDepletionUtilityPlantInService Total in Service (18 thru 21) |
|
|
|||||
23 |
DepreciationAmortizationAndDepletionUtilityPlantLeasedToOthersAbstract Leased to Others |
|||||||
24 |
DepreciationUtilityPlantLeasedToOthers Depreciation |
|||||||
25 |
AmortizationAndDepletionUtilityPlantLeasedToOthers Amortization and Depletion |
|||||||
26 |
DepreciationAmortizationAndDepletionUtilityPlantLeasedToOthers Total Leased to Others (24 & 25) |
|||||||
27 |
DepreciationAndAmortizationUtilityPlantHeldForFutureUseAbstract Held for Future Use |
|||||||
28 |
DepreciationUtilityPlantHeldForFutureUse Depreciation |
|||||||
29 |
AmortizationUtilityPlantHeldForFutureUse Amortization |
|||||||
30 |
DepreciationAndAmortizationUtilityPlantHeldForFutureUse Total Held for Future Use (28 & 29) |
|||||||
31 |
AbandonmentOfLeases Abandonment of Leases (Natural Gas) |
|||||||
32 |
AmortizationOfPlantAcquisitionAdjustment Amortization of Plant Acquisition Adjustment |
|
|
|||||
33 |
AccumulatedProvisionForDepreciationAmortizationAndDepletionOfPlantUtility Total Accum Prov (equals 14) (22,26,30,31,32) |
|
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
Electric Plant In Service and Accum Provision For Depr by Function |
|||
|
|||
Line No. |
Item (a) |
Plant in Service Balance at End of Quarter (b) |
Accumulated Depreciation And Amortization Balance at End of Quarter (c) |
1 |
Intangible Plant |
|
|
2 |
Steam Production Plant |
|
|
3 |
Nuclear Production Plant |
|
|
4 |
Hydraulic Production - Conventional |
||
5 |
Hydraulic Production - Pumped Storage |
||
6 |
Other Production |
|
|
7 |
Transmission |
|
|
8 |
Distribution |
|
|
9 |
Regional Transmission and Market Operation |
||
10 |
General |
|
|
11 |
TOTAL (Total of lines 1 through 10) |
|
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
Transmission Service and Generation Interconnection Study Costs |
|||||
|
|||||
Line No. |
DescriptionOfStudyPerformed Description (a) |
StudyCostsIncurred Costs Incurred During Period (b) |
StudyCostsAccountCharged Account Charged (c) |
StudyCostsReimbursements Reimbursements Received During the Period (d) |
StudyCostsAccountReimbursed Account Credited With Reimbursement (e) |
1 |
Transmission Studies |
||||
20 |
Total |
||||
21 |
Generation Studies |
||||
22 | |||||
23 | |||||
24 | |||||
25 | |||||
26 | |||||
27 | |||||
28 | |||||
29 | |||||
30 | |||||
31 | |||||
32 | |||||
33 | |||||
34 | |||||
35 | |||||
36 | |||||
37 | |||||
38 | |||||
39 | |||||
40 | |||||
41 | |||||
42 | |||||
43 | |||||
44 | |||||
45 | |||||
46 | |||||
47 | |||||
48 | |||||
49 | |||||
50 | |||||
51 | |||||
52 | |||||
53 | |||||
54 | |||||
55 | |||||
56 | |||||
57 | |||||
58 | |||||
59 | |||||
60 | |||||
61 | |||||
62 | |||||
63 | |||||
64 | |||||
65 | |||||
66 | |||||
67 | |||||
68 | |||||
69 | |||||
70 | |||||
71 | |||||
72 | |||||
73 | |||||
74 | |||||
75 | |||||
76 | |||||
77 | |||||
78 | |||||
79 | |||||
80 | |||||
81 | |||||
82 | |||||
83 | |||||
84 | |||||
85 | |||||
86 | |||||
87 | |||||
88 | |||||
89 | |||||
90 | |||||
91 | |||||
92 | |||||
93 | |||||
94 | |||||
95 | |||||
96 | |||||
97 | |||||
98 | |||||
99 | |||||
100 | |||||
101 | |||||
102 | |||||
103 | |||||
104 | |||||
105 | |||||
106 | |||||
107 | |||||
108 | |||||
109 | |||||
110 | |||||
111 | |||||
112 | |||||
113 | |||||
114 | |||||
115 | |||||
116 | |||||
117 | |||||
118 | |||||
119 | |||||
120 | |||||
121 | |||||
122 | |||||
123 | |||||
124 | |||||
125 | |||||
126 | |||||
127 | |||||
128 | |||||
129 | |||||
130 | |||||
131 | |||||
132 | |||||
133 | |||||
134 | |||||
135 | |||||
136 | |||||
137 | |||||
138 | |||||
139 | |||||
140 | |||||
141 | |||||
142 | |||||
143 | |||||
144 | |||||
145 | |||||
146 | |||||
147 | |||||
148 | |||||
149 | |||||
150 | |||||
151 | |||||
152 | |||||
153 | |||||
154 | |||||
155 | |||||
156 | |||||
157 | |||||
158 | |||||
159 | |||||
160 | |||||
161 | |||||
162 | |||||
163 | |||||
164 | |||||
165 | |||||
166 | |||||
167 | |||||
168 | |||||
169 | |||||
170 | |||||
171 | |||||
172 | |||||
173 | |||||
174 | |||||
175 | |||||
176 | |||||
177 | |||||
178 | |||||
179 | |||||
180 | |||||
181 | |||||
182 | |||||
183 | |||||
184 | |||||
185 | |||||
186 | |||||
187 | |||||
188 | |||||
189 | |||||
190 | |||||
191 | |||||
192 | |||||
193 | |||||
194 | |||||
195 | |||||
196 | |||||
197 | |||||
198 | |||||
199 | |||||
200 | |||||
201 | |||||
202 | |||||
203 | |||||
204 | |||||
205 | |||||
206 | |||||
207 | |||||
208 | |||||
209 | |||||
210 | |||||
211 | |||||
212 | |||||
213 | |||||
214 | |||||
215 | |||||
216 | |||||
217 | |||||
218 | |||||
219 | |||||
220 | |||||
221 | |||||
222 | |||||
223 | |||||
224 | |||||
225 | |||||
226 | |||||
227 | |||||
228 | |||||
229 | |||||
230 | |||||
231 | |||||
232 | |||||
233 | |||||
234 | |||||
235 | |||||
236 | |||||
237 | |||||
238 | |||||
239 | |||||
240 | |||||
241 | |||||
242 | |||||
243 | |||||
244 | |||||
245 | |||||
246 | |||||
247 | |||||
248 | |||||
249 | |||||
250 | |||||
251 | |||||
252 | |||||
253 | |||||
254 | |||||
255 | |||||
256 | |||||
257 | |||||
258 | |||||
259 | |||||
260 | |||||
261 | |||||
262 | |||||
263 | |||||
264 | |||||
265 | |||||
266 | |||||
267 | |||||
268 | |||||
269 | |||||
270 | |||||
271 | |||||
272 | |||||
273 | |||||
274 | |||||
275 | |||||
276 | |||||
277 | |||||
278 | |||||
279 | |||||
280 | |||||
281 | |||||
282 | |||||
283 | |||||
284 | |||||
285 | |||||
286 | |||||
287 | |||||
288 | |||||
289 | |||||
290 | |||||
291 | |||||
292 | |||||
293 | |||||
294 | |||||
295 | |||||
296 | |||||
297 | |||||
298 | |||||
299 | |||||
300 | |||||
301 | |||||
302 | |||||
303 | |||||
304 | |||||
305 | |||||
306 | |||||
307 | |||||
308 | |||||
309 | |||||
310 | |||||
311 | |||||
312 | |||||
313 | |||||
314 | |||||
315 | |||||
316 | |||||
317 | |||||
318 | |||||
319 | |||||
320 | |||||
321 | |||||
322 | |||||
323 | |||||
324 | |||||
325 | |||||
326 | |||||
327 | |||||
328 | |||||
329 | |||||
330 | |||||
331 | |||||
332 | |||||
333 | |||||
334 | |||||
335 | |||||
336 | |||||
337 | |||||
39 |
Total |
|
|
||
40 | Grand Total |
|
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
OTHER REGULATORY ASSETS (Account 182.3) |
||||||
|
||||||
CREDITS | ||||||
Line No. |
DescriptionAndPurposeOfOtherRegulatoryAssets Description and Purpose of Other Regulatory Assets (a) |
OtherRegulatoryAssets Balance at Beginning of Current Quarter/Year (b) |
IncreaseDecreaseInOtherRegulatoryAssets Debits (c) |
OtherRegulatoryAssetsWrittenOffAccountCharged Written off During Quarter/Year Account Charged (d) |
OtherRegulatoryAssetsWrittenOffRecovered Written off During the Period Amount (e) |
OtherRegulatoryAssets Balance at end of Current Quarter/Year (f) |
1 | ||||||
2 | ||||||
3 | ||||||
4 | ||||||
5 | ||||||
6 | ||||||
7 | ||||||
8 | ||||||
9 | ||||||
10 | ||||||
11 | ||||||
12 | ||||||
13 | ||||||
14 | ||||||
15 | ||||||
16 | (a) |
|||||
17 | (b) |
|||||
18 | ||||||
19 | ||||||
20 | ||||||
21 | ||||||
22 | ||||||
23 | ||||||
24 | ||||||
25 | ||||||
44 |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
FOOTNOTE DATA |
(a) Concept: OtherRegulatoryAssetsWrittenOffRecovered |
(b) Concept: OtherRegulatoryAssetsWrittenOffRecovered |
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
OTHER REGULATORY LIABILITIES (Account 254) |
||||||
|
||||||
DEBITS | ||||||
Line No. |
Description and Purpose of Other Regulatory Liabilities (a) |
Balance at Beginning of Current Quarter/Year (b) |
Account Credited (c) |
Amount (d) |
Credits (e) |
Balance at End of Current Quarter/Year (f) |
1 |
|
|
|
|
||
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
||
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
||
10 |
|
|
|
|||
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
||
14 |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|||
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 | TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
FOOTNOTE DATA |
(a) Concept: DecreaseInOtherRegulatoryLiabilities |
(b) Concept: DecreaseInOtherRegulatoryLiabilities |
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
Electric Operating Revenues |
|||||||
|
|||||||
Line No. |
Title of Account (a) |
Operating Revenues Year to Date Quarterly/Annual (b) |
Operating Revenues Previous year (no Quarterly) (c) |
MEGAWATT HOURS SOLD Year to Date Quarterly/Annual (d) |
MEGAWATT HOURS SOLD Amount Previous year (no Quarterly) (e) |
AVG.NO. CUSTOMERS PER MONTH Current Year (no Quarterly) (f) |
AVG.NO. CUSTOMERS PER MONTH Previous Year (no Quarterly) (g) |
1 |
SalesOfElectricityHeadingAbstract Sales of Electricity |
||||||
2 |
ResidentialSalesAbstract (440) Residential Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
CommercialAndIndustrialSalesAbstract (442) Commercial and Industrial Sales |
||||||
4 |
CommercialSalesAbstract Small (or Comm.) (See Instr. 4) |
(a) |
(e) |
|
|
|
|
5 |
IndustrialSalesAbstract Large (or Ind.) (See Instr. 4) |
(b) |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
6 |
PublicStreetAndHighwayLightingAbstract (444) Public Street and Highway Lighting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
OtherSalesToPublicAuthoritiesAbstract (445) Other Sales to Public Authorities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
SalesToRailroadsAndRailwaysAbstract (446) Sales to Railroads and Railways |
||||||
9 |
InterdepartmentalSalesAbstract (448) Interdepartmental Sales |
||||||
10 |
SalesToUltimateConsumersAbstract TOTAL Sales to Ultimate Consumers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
SalesForResaleAbstract (447) Sales for Resale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
SalesOfElectricityAbstract TOTAL Sales of Electricity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
ProvisionForRateRefundsAbstract (Less) (449.1) Provision for Rate Refunds |
||||||
14 |
RevenuesNetOfProvisionForRefundsAbstract TOTAL Revenues Before Prov. for Refunds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
OtherOperatingRevenuesAbstract Other Operating Revenues |
||||||
16 |
ForfeitedDiscounts (450) Forfeited Discounts |
|
|
||||
17 |
MiscellaneousServiceRevenues (451) Miscellaneous Service Revenues |
(c) |
(g) |
||||
18 |
SalesOfWaterAndWaterPower (453) Sales of Water and Water Power |
||||||
19 |
RentFromElectricProperty (454) Rent from Electric Property |
|
|
||||
20 |
InterdepartmentalRents (455) Interdepartmental Rents |
||||||
21 |
OtherElectricRevenue (456) Other Electric Revenues |
(d) |
(h) |
||||
22 |
RevenuesFromTransmissionOfElectricityOfOthers (456.1) Revenues from Transmission of Electricity of Others |
|
|
||||
23 |
RegionalTransmissionServiceRevenues (457.1) Regional Control Service Revenues |
||||||
24 |
MiscellaneousRevenue (457.2) Miscellaneous Revenues |
||||||
25 |
OtherMiscellaneousOperatingRevenues Other Miscellaneous Operating Revenues |
||||||
26 |
OtherOperatingRevenues TOTAL Other Operating Revenues |
|
|
||||
27 |
ElectricOperatingRevenues TOTAL Electric Operating Revenues |
|
|
||||
Line12, column (b) includes $
(i) of unbilled revenues.
|
|||||||
Line12, column (d) includes
(j) MWH relating to unbilled revenues
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
FOOTNOTE DATA |
(a) Concept: SmallOrCommercialSalesElectricOperatingRevenue | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(b) Concept: LargeOrIndustrialSalesElectricOperatingRevenue | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(c) Concept: MiscellaneousServiceRevenues | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(d) Concept: OtherElectricRevenue | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(e) Concept: SmallOrCommercialSalesElectricOperatingRevenue | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(f) Concept: LargeOrIndustrialSalesElectricOperatingRevenue | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(g) Concept: MiscellaneousServiceRevenues | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(h) Concept: OtherElectricRevenue | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(i) Concept: RevenueFromSalesOfElectricityUnbilled | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(j) Concept: MegawattHoursOfElectricitySoldUnbilled | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
REGIONAL TRANSMISSION SERVICE REVENUES (Account 457.1) |
|||||
|
|||||
Line No. |
Description of Service (a) |
Balance at End of Quarter 1 (b) |
Balance at End of Quarter 2 (c) |
Balance at End of Quarter 3 (d) |
Balance at End of Year (e) |
1 | |||||
2 | |||||
3 | |||||
4 | |||||
5 | |||||
6 | |||||
7 | |||||
8 | |||||
9 | |||||
10 | |||||
11 | |||||
12 | |||||
13 | |||||
14 | |||||
15 | |||||
16 | |||||
17 | |||||
18 | |||||
19 | |||||
20 | |||||
21 | |||||
22 | |||||
23 | |||||
24 | |||||
25 | |||||
26 | |||||
27 | |||||
28 | |||||
29 | |||||
30 | |||||
31 | |||||
32 | |||||
33 | |||||
34 | |||||
35 | |||||
36 | |||||
37 | |||||
38 | |||||
39 | |||||
40 | |||||
41 | |||||
42 | |||||
43 | |||||
44 | |||||
45 | |||||
46 |
TOTAL |
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
ELECTRIC PRODUCTION, OTHER POWER SUPPLY EXPENSES, TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION EXPENSES | ||
Report Electric production, other power supply expenses, transmission, regional market, and distribution expenses through the reporting period. |
||
Line No. |
Account (a) |
Year to Date Quarter (b) |
1 |
PowerProductionExpensesAbstract 1. POWER PRODUCTION AND OTHER SUPPLY EXPENSES |
|
2 |
SteamPowerGenerationOperationsExpense Steam Power Generation - Operation (500-509) |
|
3 |
SteamPowerGenerationMaintenanceExpense Steam Power Generation – Maintenance (510-515) |
|
4 |
PowerProductionExpensesSteamPower Total Power Production Expenses - Steam Power |
|
5 |
NuclearPowerGenerationOperationsExpense Nuclear Power Generation – Operation (517-525) |
|
6 |
NuclearPowerGenerationMaintenanceExpense Nuclear Power Generation – Maintenance (528-532) |
|
7 |
PowerProductionExpensesNuclearPower Total Power Production Expenses - Nuclear Power |
|
8 |
HydraulicPowerGenerationOperationsExpense Hydraulic Power Generation – Operation (535-540.1) |
|
9 |
HydraulicPowerGenerationMaintenanceExpense Hydraulic Power Generation – Maintenance (541-545.1) |
|
10 |
PowerProductionExpensesHydraulicPower Total Power Production Expenses - Hydraulic Power |
|
11 |
RentsOtherPowerGeneration Other Power Generation – Operation (546-550.1) |
|
12 |
MaintenanceOfEnergyStorageEquipmentOtherPowerGeneration Other Power Generation – Maintenance (551-554.1) |
|
13 |
MaintenanceOfMiscellaneousOtherPowerGenerationPlant Total Power Production Expenses - Other Power |
|
14 |
OtherPowerSuplyExpensesAbstract Other Power Supply Expenses |
|
15 |
PurchasedPower (555) Purchased Power |
|
15.1 |
PowerPurchasedForStorageOperations (555.1) Power Purchased for Storage Operations |
|
16 |
SystemControlAndLoadDispatchingElectric (556) System Control and Load Dispatching |
|
17 |
OtherExpensesOtherPowerSupplyExpenses (557) Other Expenses |
|
18 |
OtherPowerSupplyExpense Total Other Power Supply Expenses (line 15-17) |
|
19 |
PowerProductionExpenses Total Power Production Expenses (Total of lines 4, 7, 10, 13 and 18) |
|
20 |
TransmissionExpensesAbstract 2. TRANSMISSION EXPENSES |
|
21 |
TransmissionExpensesOperationAbstract Transmission Operation Expenses |
|
22 |
OperationSupervisionAndEngineeringElectricTransmissionExpenses (560) Operation Supervision and Engineering |
|
24 |
LoadDispatchReliability (561.1) Load Dispatch-Reliability |
|
25 |
LoadDispatchMonitorAndOperateTransmissionSystem (561.2) Load Dispatch-Monitor and Operate Transmission System |
|
26 |
LoadDispatchTransmissionServiceAndScheduling (561.3) Load Dispatch-Transmission Service and Scheduling |
|
27 |
SchedulingSystemControlAndDispatchServices (561.4) Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch Services |
|
28 |
ReliabilityPlanningAndStandardsDevelopment (561.5) Reliability, Planning and Standards Development |
|
29 |
TransmissionServiceStudies (561.6) Transmission Service Studies |
|
30 |
GenerationInterconnectionStudies (561.7) Generation Interconnection Studies |
|
31 |
ReliabilityPlanningAndStandardsDevelopmentServices (561.8) Reliability, Planning and Standards Development Services |
|
32 |
StationExpensesTransmissionExpense (562) Station Expenses |
|
32.1 |
OperationOfEnergyStorageEquipmentTransmissionExpense (562.1) Operation of Energy Storage Equipment |
|
33 |
OverheadLineExpense (563) Overhead Lines Expenses |
|
34 |
UndergroundLineExpensesTransmissionExpense (564) Underground Lines Expenses |
|
35 |
TransmissionOfElectricityByOthers (565) Transmission of Electricity by Others |
|
36 |
MiscellaneousTransmissionExpenses (566) Miscellaneous Transmission Expenses |
|
37 |
RentsTransmissionElectricExpense (567) Rents |
|
38 |
OperationSuppliesAndExpensesTransmissionExpense (567.1) Operation Supplies and Expenses (Non-Major) |
|
39 |
TransmissionOperationExpense TOTAL Transmission Operation Expenses (Lines 22 - 38) |
|
40 |
TransmissionMaintenanceAbstract Transmission Maintenance Expenses |
|
41 |
MaintenanceSupervisionAndEngineeringElectricTransmissionExpenses (568) Maintenance Supervision and Engineering |
|
42 |
MaintenanceOfStructuresTransmissionExpense (569) Maintenance of Structures |
|
43 |
MaintenanceOfComputerHardwareTransmission (569.1) Maintenance of Computer Hardware |
|
44 |
MaintenanceOfComputerSoftwareTransmission (569.2) Maintenance of Computer Software |
|
45 |
MaintenanceOfCommunicationEquipmentElectricTransmission (569.3) Maintenance of Communication Equipment |
|
46 |
MaintenanceOfMiscellaneousRegionalTransmissionPlant (569.4) Maintenance of Miscellaneous Regional Transmission Plant |
|
47 |
MaintenanceOfStationEquipmentTransmission (570) Maintenance of Station Equipment |
|
47.1 |
MaintenanceOfEnergyStorageEquipmentTransmission (570.1) Maintenance of Energy Storage Equipment |
|
48 |
MaintenanceOfOverheadLinesTransmission (571) Maintenance of Overhead Lines |
|
49 |
MaintenanceOfUndergroundLinesTransmission (572) Maintenance of Underground Lines |
|
50 |
MaintenanceOfMiscellaneousTransmissionPlant (573) Maintenance of Miscellaneous Transmission Plant |
|
51 |
MaintenanceOfTransmissionPlant (574) Maintenance of Transmission Plant |
|
52 |
TransmissionMaintenanceExpenseElectric TOTAL Transmission Maintenance Expenses (Lines 41 – 51) |
|
53 |
TransmissionExpenses Total Transmission Expenses (Lines 39 and 52) |
|
54 |
RegionalMarketExpensesAbstract 3. REGIONAL MARKET EXPENSES |
|
55 |
RegionalMarketExpensesOperationAbstract Regional Market Operation Expenses |
|
56 |
OperationSupervision (575.1) Operation Supervision |
|
57 |
DayAheadAndRealTimeMarketAdministration (575.2) Day-Ahead and Real-Time Market Facilitation |
|
58 |
TransmissionRightsMarketAdministration (575.3) Transmission Rights Market Facilitation |
|
59 |
CapacityMarketAdministration (575.4) Capacity Market Facilitation |
|
60 |
AncillaryServicesMarketAdministration (575.5) Ancillary Services Market Facilitation |
|
61 |
MarketMonitoringAndCompliance (575.6) Market Monitoring and Compliance |
|
62 |
MarketFacilitationMonitoringAndComplianceServices (575.7) Market Facilitation, Monitoring and Compliance Services |
|
63 |
RegionalMarketOperationExpense Regional Market Operation Expenses (Lines 55 - 62) |
|
64 |
RegionalMarketExpensesMaintenanceAbstract Regional Market Maintenance Expenses |
|
65 |
MaintenanceOfStructuresAndImprovementsRegionalMarketExpenses (576.1) Maintenance of Structures and Improvements |
|
66 |
MaintenanceOfComputerHardware (576.2) Maintenance of Computer Hardware |
|
67 |
MaintenanceOfComputerSoftware (576.3) Maintenance of Computer Software |
|
68 |
MaintenanceOfCommunicationEquipmentRegionalMarketExpenses (576.4) Maintenance of Communication Equipment |
|
69 |
MaintenanceOfMiscellaneousMarketOperationPlant (576.5) Maintenance of Miscellaneous Market Operation Plant |
|
70 |
RegionalMarketMaintenanceExpense Regional Market Maintenance Expenses (Lines 65-69) |
|
71 |
RegionalMarketExpenses TOTAL Regional Control and Market Operation Expenses (Lines 63,70) |
|
72 |
DistributionExpensesAbstract 4. DISTRIBUTION EXPENSES |
|
73 |
DistributionOperationExpensesElectric Distribution Operation Expenses (580-589) |
|
74 |
DistributionMaintenanceExpenseElectric Distribution Maintenance Expenses (590-598) |
|
75 |
DistributionExpenses Total Distribution Expenses (Lines 73 and 74) |
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
Electric Customer Accts, Service, Sales, Admin and General Expenses |
||
Report the amount of expenses for customer accounts, service, sales, and administrative and general expenses year to date. |
||
Line No. |
Account (a) |
Year to Date Quarter (b) |
- |
CustomerAccountsExpensesOperationsAbstract Operation |
|
1 |
CustomerAccountExpenses (901-905) Customer Accounts Expenses |
|
2 |
CustomerServiceAndInformationExpenses (907-910) Customer Service and Information Expenses |
|
3 |
SalesExpenses (911-917) Sales Expenses |
|
4 |
AdministrativeAndGeneralExpensesAbstract 8. ADMINISTRATIVE AND GENERAL EXPENSES |
|
5 |
AdministrativeAndGeneralExpensesOperationAbstract Operation |
|
6 |
AdministrativeAndGeneralSalaries (920) Administrative and General Salaries |
|
7 |
OfficeSuppliesAndExpenses (921) Office Supplies and Expenses |
|
8 |
AdministrativeExpensesTransferredCredit (Less) (922) Administrative Expenses Transferred-Credit |
|
9 |
OutsideServicesEmployed (923) Outside Services Employed |
|
10 |
PropertyInsurance (924) Property Insurance |
|
11 |
InjuriesAndDamages (925) Injuries and Damages |
|
12 |
EmployeePensionsAndBenefits (926) Employee Pensions and Benefits |
|
13 |
FranchiseRequirements (927) Franchise Requirements |
|
14 |
RegulatoryCommissionExpenses (928) Regulatory Commission Expenses |
|
15 |
DuplicateChargesCredit (929) (Less) Duplicate Charges-Cr. |
|
16 |
GeneralAdvertisingExpenses (930.1) General Advertising Expenses |
|
17 |
MiscellaneousGeneralExpenses (930.2) Miscellaneous General Expenses |
|
18 |
RentsAdministrativeAndGeneralExpense (931) Rents |
|
19 |
AdministrativeAndGeneralOperationExpense TOTAL Operation (Total of lines 6 thru 18) |
|
20 |
AdministrativeAndGeneralExpensesMaintenanceAbstract Maintenance |
|
21 |
MaintenanceOfGeneralPlant (935) Maintenance of General Plant |
|
22 |
AdministrativeAndGeneralExpenses TOTAL Administrative and General Expenses (Total of lines 19 and 21) |
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRICITY FOR OTHERS (Account 456.1) (Including transactions referred to as "wheeling") |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
TRANSFER OF ENERGY | REVENUE FROM TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRICITY FOR OTHERS | |||||||||||||
Line No. |
PaymentByCompanyOrPublicAuthority Payment By (Company of Public Authority) (Footnote Affiliation) (a) |
TransmissionEnergyReceivedFromCompanyOrPublicAuthorityName Energy Received From (Company of Public Authority) (Footnote Affiliation) (b) |
TransmissionEnergyDeliveredToCompanyOrPublicAuthorityName Energy Delivered To (Company of Public Authority) (Footnote Affiliation) (c) |
StatisticalClassificationCode Statistical Classification (d) |
RateScheduleTariffNumber Ferc Rate Schedule of Tariff Number (e) |
TransmissionPointOfReceipt Point of Receipt (Substation or Other Designation) (f) |
TransmissionPointOfDelivery Point of Delivery (Substation or Other Designation) (g) |
BillingDemand Billing Demand (MW) (h) |
TransmissionOfElectricityForOthersEnergyReceived Megawatt Hours Received (i) |
TransmissionOfElectricityForOthersEnergyDelivered Megawatt Hours Delivered (j) |
Demand Charges ($) (k) |
Energy Charges ($) (l) |
Other Charges ($) (m) |
RevenuesFromTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers Total Revenues ($) (k+l+m) (n) |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(z) |
|
|
||||
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(aa) |
|
|
||||
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ab) |
|
|
||||
4 |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ar) |
|
5 |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as) |
|
6 |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(at) |
|
7 |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(au) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(av) |
|
9 |
|
|
|
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(aw) |
|
10 |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ax) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(h) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ay) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(i) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(az) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(j) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ba) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(k) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bb) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(l) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bc) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(m) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bd) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(n) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(be) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(o) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bf) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(p) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
20 |
|
|
|
(q) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bg) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(r) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bh) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bi) |
|
||
23 |
|
|
|
(t) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bj) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(u) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
25 |
|
|
|
(v) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bk) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(w) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bl) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bm) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bn) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bo) |
|
||||
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bp) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bq) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(br) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bs) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bt) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bu) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ac) |
|
||
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ad) |
|
||
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bv) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ae) |
|
||
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(af) |
|
||
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ag) |
(bw) |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ah) |
|
||
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bx) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ai) |
|
||
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(by) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(aj) |
|
||||
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(bz) |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ak) |
(ca) |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cb) |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(al) |
|
||
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cc) |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cd) |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ce) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cf) |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cg) |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ch) |
|
|||
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ci) |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cj) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ck) |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cl) |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cm) |
|
||||
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cn) |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(co) |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cp) |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cq) |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cr) |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cs) |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ct) |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cu) |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cv) |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cw) |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cx) |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cy) |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(cz) |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(da) |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(db) |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
(x) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
130 |
|
|
|
(y) |
|
|
|
|
||||||
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dc) |
|
||||
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(am) |
|
|
|||
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(an) |
|
||||
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dd) |
|
||||
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ao) |
|
||||
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(de) |
|
||||
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ap) |
|
||||
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(aq) |
|
||||
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(df) |
|
|||
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dg) |
|
||||
35 | TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
FOOTNOTE DATA |
(a) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(b) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(c) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(d) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(e) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(f) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(g) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(h) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(i) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(j) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(k) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(l) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(m) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(n) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(o) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(p) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(q) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(r) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(s) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(t) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(u) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(v) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(w) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(x) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(y) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(z) Concept: BillingDemand |
(aa) Concept: BillingDemand |
(ab) Concept: BillingDemand |
(ac) Concept: DemandChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ad) Concept: DemandChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ae) Concept: DemandChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(af) Concept: DemandChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ag) Concept: DemandChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ah) Concept: DemandChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ai) Concept: DemandChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(aj) Concept: DemandChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ak) Concept: DemandChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(al) Concept: DemandChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(am) Concept: DemandChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(an) Concept: DemandChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ao) Concept: DemandChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ap) Concept: DemandChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(aq) Concept: DemandChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ar) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(as) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(at) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(au) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(av) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(aw) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ax) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ay) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(az) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ba) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bb) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bc) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bd) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(be) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bf) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bg) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bh) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bi) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bj) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bk) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bl) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bm) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bn) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bo) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bp) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bq) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(br) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bs) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bt) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bu) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bv) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bw) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bx) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(by) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(bz) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ca) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cb) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cc) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cd) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ce) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cf) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cg) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ch) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ci) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cj) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ck) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cl) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cm) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cn) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(co) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cp) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cq) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cr) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cs) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(ct) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cu) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cv) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cw) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cx) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cy) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(cz) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(da) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(db) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(dc) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(dd) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(de) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(df) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
(dg) Concept: OtherChargesRevenueTransmissionOfElectricityForOthers |
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRICITY BY ISO/RTOs |
|||||
|
|||||
Line No. |
Payment Received by (Transmission Owner Name) (a) |
Statistical Classification (b) |
FERC Rate Schedule or Tariff Number (c) |
Total Revenue by Rate Schedule or Tariff (d) |
Total Revenue (e) |
1 | |||||
2 | |||||
3 | |||||
4 | |||||
5 | |||||
6 | |||||
7 | |||||
8 | |||||
9 | |||||
10 | |||||
11 | |||||
12 | |||||
13 | |||||
14 | |||||
15 | |||||
16 | |||||
17 | |||||
18 | |||||
19 | |||||
20 | |||||
21 | |||||
22 | |||||
23 | |||||
24 | |||||
25 | |||||
26 | |||||
27 | |||||
28 | |||||
29 | |||||
30 | |||||
31 | |||||
32 | |||||
33 | |||||
34 | |||||
35 | |||||
36 | |||||
37 | |||||
38 | |||||
39 | |||||
40 | |||||
41 | |||||
42 | |||||
43 | |||||
44 | |||||
45 | |||||
46 | |||||
47 | |||||
48 | |||||
49 | |||||
40 |
TOTAL |
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRICITY BY OTHERS (Account 565) |
||||||||
|
||||||||
TRANSFER OF ENERGY | EXPENSES FOR TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRICITY BY OTHERS | |||||||
Line No. |
NameOfCompanyOrPublicAuthorityTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers Name of Company or Public Authority (Footnote Affiliations) (a) |
StatisticalClassificationCode Statistical Classification (b) |
TransmissionOfElectricityByOthersEnergyReceived MegaWatt Hours Received (c) |
TransmissionOfElectricityByOthersEnergyDelivered MegaWatt Hours Delivered (d) |
DemandChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers Demand Charges ($) (e) |
EnergyChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers Energy Charges ($) (f) |
OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers Other Charges ($) (g) |
ChargesForTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers Total Cost of Transmission ($) (h) |
1 |
(a) |
|
|
|
||||
2 |
|
(b) |
|
|
||||
3 |
|
(c) |
|
|
|
(o) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(p) |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(q) |
|
7 |
|
(d) |
|
|
|
(r) |
|
|
8 |
|
(e) |
|
|
|
|
(s) |
|
9 |
|
(f) |
|
(t) |
|
|||
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
(u) |
|
|
12 |
|
(g) |
|
|
|
(v) |
|
|
13 |
|
(h) |
|
|
|
|
(w) |
|
14 |
|
(i) |
|
|
|
|
(x) |
|
15 |
|
(j) |
|
|
|
|
(y) |
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(z) |
(af) |
17 |
|
(k) |
|
|
|
|
(aa) |
|
18 |
|
(l) |
|
|
|
(ab) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
(ac) |
||
21 |
|
(m) |
|
|
|
(ad) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
(n) |
|
|
||||
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
(ae) |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOOTNOTE DATA |
(a) Concept: NameOfCompanyOrPublicAuthorityTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(b) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(c) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(d) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(e) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(f) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(g) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(h) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(i) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(j) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(k) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(l) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(m) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(n) Concept: StatisticalClassificationCode |
(o) Concept: OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(p) Concept: OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(q) Concept: OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(r) Concept: OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(s) Concept: OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(t) Concept: OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(u) Concept: OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(v) Concept: OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(w) Concept: OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(x) Concept: OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(y) Concept: OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(z) Concept: OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(aa) Concept: OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(ab) Concept: OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(ac) Concept: OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(ad) Concept: OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(ae) Concept: OtherChargesTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
(af) Concept: ChargesForTransmissionOfElectricityByOthers |
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
Deprec, Depl and Amort of Elec Plant (403,403.1,404,and 405) (except Amortization of Acquisition Adjustments) |
||||||
|
||||||
Line No. |
FunctionalClassificationAxis Functional Classification (a) |
DepreciationExpenseExcludingAmortizationOfAcquisitionAdjustments Depreciation Expense (Account 403) (b) |
DepreciationExpenseForAssetRetirementCostsExcludingAmortizationgOfAcquisitionAdjustments Depreciation Expense for Asset Retirement Costs (Account 403.1) (c) |
AmortizationOfLimitedTermPlantOrProperty Amortization of Limited Term Electric Plant (Account 404) (d) |
AmortizationOfOtherElectricPlant Amortization of Other Electric Plant (Acc 405) (e) |
DepreciationAndAmortization Total (f) |
1 |
Intangible Plant |
|
|
|||
2 |
Steam Production Plant |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Nuclear Production Plant |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Hydraulic Production Plant-Conventional |
|||||
5 |
Hydraulic Production Plant-Pumped Storage |
|||||
6 |
Other Production Plant |
|
|
|
||
7 |
Transmission Plant |
|
|
|
||
8 |
Distribution Plant |
|
|
|
||
9 |
General Plant |
|
|
|
||
10 |
Common Plant-Electric |
|||||
11 |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
AMOUNTS INCLUDED IN ISO/RTO SETTLEMENT STATEMENTS |
|||||
|
|||||
Line No. |
Description of Item(s) (a) |
Balance at End of Quarter 1 (b) |
Balance at End of Quarter 2 (c) |
Balance at End of Quarter 3 (d) |
Balance at End of Year (e) |
1 | Energy | ||||
2 | Net Purchases (Account 555) |
|
|
||
2.1 | Net Purchases (Account 555.1) | ||||
3 | Net Sales (Account 447) |
|
|
||
4 | Transmission Rights | ||||
5 | Ancillary Services | ||||
6 | Other Items (list separately) | ||||
7 |
|
|
|
||
46 | TOTAL |
|
|
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
Monthly Peak Loads and Energy Output |
||||||
|
||||||
Line No. |
MonthAxis Month (a) |
Total Monthly Energy (MWH) (b) |
Monthly Non-Requirements Sales for Resale & Associated Losses (c) |
MonthlyPeakLoad Monthly Peak Megawatts (See Instr. 4) (d) |
DayOfMonthlyPeak Monthly Peak Day of Month (e) |
HourOfMonthlyPeak Monthly Peak Hour (f) |
NAME OF SYSTEM: Arizona Public Service Company |
||||||
1 |
January |
|
||||
2 |
February |
|
||||
3 |
March |
|
||||
4 |
Total for Quarter 1 |
|
||||
5 |
April |
|
||||
6 |
May |
|
||||
7 |
June |
|
||||
8 |
Total for Quarter 2 |
|
||||
9 |
July |
|||||
10 |
August |
|||||
11 |
September |
|||||
12 |
Total for Quarter 3 |
|||||
41 |
Total |
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
MONTHLY TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PEAK LOAD |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Line No. |
Month (a) |
Monthly Peak MW - Total (b) |
Day of Monthly Peak (c) |
Hour of Monthly Peak (d) |
Firm Network Service for Self (e) |
Firm Network Service for Others (f) |
Long-Term Firm Point-to-point Reservations (g) |
Other Long-Term Firm Service (h) |
Short-Term Firm Point-to-point Reservation (i) |
Other Service (j) |
NAME OF SYSTEM: Arizona Public Service Company |
||||||||||
1 |
January |
|
||||||||
2 |
February |
|
||||||||
3 |
March |
|
||||||||
4 |
Total for Quarter 1 |
|||||||||
5 |
April |
|
||||||||
6 |
May |
|
||||||||
7 |
June |
|
||||||||
8 |
Total for Quarter 2 |
|||||||||
9 |
July |
|||||||||
10 |
August |
|||||||||
11 |
September |
|||||||||
12 |
Total for Quarter 3 |
|||||||||
13 |
October |
|||||||||
14 |
November |
|||||||||
15 |
December |
|||||||||
16 |
Total for Quarter 4 |
|||||||||
17 |
Total |
Name of Respondent: |
This report is: (1) ☑ An Original (2) ☐ A Resubmission |
Date of Report: |
Year/Period of Report End of: |
Monthly ISO/RTO Transmission System Peak Load |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Line No. |
Month (a) |
Monthly Peak MW - Total (b) |
Day of Monthly Peak (c) |
Hour of Monthly Peak (d) |
Import into ISO/RTO (e) |
Exports from ISO/RTO (f) |
Through and Out Service (g) |
Network Service Usage (h) |
Point-to-Point Service Usage (i) |
Total Usage (j) |
NAME OF SYSTEM: Arizona Public Service Company |
||||||||||
1 |
January |
|||||||||
2 |
February |
|||||||||
3 |
March |
|||||||||
4 |
Total for Quarter 1 |
|||||||||
5 |
April |
|||||||||
6 |
May |
|||||||||
7 |
June |
|||||||||
8 |
Total for Quarter 2 |
|||||||||
9 |
July |
|||||||||
10 |
August |
|||||||||
11 |
September |
|||||||||
12 |
Total for Quarter 3 |
|||||||||
13 |
October |
|||||||||
14 |
November |
|||||||||
15 |
December |
|||||||||
16 |
Total for Quarter 4 |
|||||||||
17 |
Total Year to Date/Year |